“It Will Only Work If Everyone is on Board”: A Needs and Context Assessment to Inform Exercise Oncology Implementation Within a Public Healthcare Organisation

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology Pub Date : 2026-10-22 Epub Date: 2026-08-11 DOI:10.1111/ajco.70158
Georgia L. White, Mary A. Kennedy, Bryan A. Chan, Hattie Wright, Grace L. Rose
{"title":"“It Will Only Work If Everyone is on Board”: A Needs and Context Assessment to Inform Exercise Oncology Implementation Within a Public Healthcare Organisation","authors":"Georgia L. White,&nbsp;Mary A. Kennedy,&nbsp;Bryan A. Chan,&nbsp;Hattie Wright,&nbsp;Grace L. Rose","doi":"10.1111/ajco.70158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Exercise has well-established benefits across the cancer continuum for people living with and beyond cancer, yet the exercise oncology field faces a research-to-practice gap. Understanding the factors that influence implementation in any given context is essential to ensure implementation strategies have the greatest likelihood of success. The study mapped onsite exercise oncology services, staff-reported implementation barriers and facilitators, organisational readiness, and experiences reported by people living with or beyond cancer, across a large public healthcare organisation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Staff and people living with and beyond cancer across cancer care centres within the public healthcare organisation completed an online survey. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and manifest content analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Across 10 regions, 115 participants completed the survey (59 staff and 56 people living with and beyond cancer). Although both groups valued and viewed exercise as important, organisation-wide and region-specific constraints were evident, particularly the absence of onsite exercise professionals and absent or unclear referral pathways. Among people living with and beyond cancer, 54% received an exercise discussion and 13% received a referral.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Across the organisation, strong support for exercise did not translate into action, as mainly outer and inner setting barriers restricted routine discussions, referrals and service delivery. Although regions within the same organisation shared several contextual factors, region-specific conditions that hindered or facilitated implementation were present. Findings reinforce that the development of implementation strategies and plans depends on a clear understanding of the context in which they will occur. These findings are informing an implementation plan in a pilot region.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":"22 6","pages":"870-880"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajco.70158","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajco.70158","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Exercise has well-established benefits across the cancer continuum for people living with and beyond cancer, yet the exercise oncology field faces a research-to-practice gap. Understanding the factors that influence implementation in any given context is essential to ensure implementation strategies have the greatest likelihood of success. The study mapped onsite exercise oncology services, staff-reported implementation barriers and facilitators, organisational readiness, and experiences reported by people living with or beyond cancer, across a large public healthcare organisation.

Methods

Staff and people living with and beyond cancer across cancer care centres within the public healthcare organisation completed an online survey. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and manifest content analysis.

Results

Across 10 regions, 115 participants completed the survey (59 staff and 56 people living with and beyond cancer). Although both groups valued and viewed exercise as important, organisation-wide and region-specific constraints were evident, particularly the absence of onsite exercise professionals and absent or unclear referral pathways. Among people living with and beyond cancer, 54% received an exercise discussion and 13% received a referral.

Conclusion

Across the organisation, strong support for exercise did not translate into action, as mainly outer and inner setting barriers restricted routine discussions, referrals and service delivery. Although regions within the same organisation shared several contextual factors, region-specific conditions that hindered or facilitated implementation were present. Findings reinforce that the development of implementation strategies and plans depends on a clear understanding of the context in which they will occur. These findings are informing an implementation plan in a pilot region.

“只有在每个人都参与的情况下,它才会起作用”:在公共卫生组织内进行的需求和背景评估,以告知运动肿瘤学的实施。
导言:对于癌症患者和非癌症患者来说,运动在整个癌症连续体中都有明显的益处,然而,运动肿瘤学领域面临着从研究到实践的差距。了解在任何特定情况下影响实施的因素对于确保实施战略取得最大成功的可能性至关重要。该研究绘制了一个大型公共医疗机构的现场运动肿瘤学服务、员工报告的实施障碍和促进因素、组织准备情况以及癌症患者或非癌症患者报告的经验。方法:公共医疗机构癌症护理中心的工作人员和癌症患者完成了一项在线调查。数据分析采用描述性统计和清单内容分析。结果:来自10个地区的115名参与者完成了调查(59名工作人员和56名癌症患者)。尽管两组都重视并认为锻炼很重要,但组织范围内和地区特定的限制是显而易见的,特别是缺乏现场锻炼专业人员和缺乏或不明确的转诊途径。在癌症患者中,54%的人接受了锻炼讨论,13%的人接受了推荐。结论:在整个组织中,对锻炼的强烈支持并没有转化为行动,主要是外部和内部设置障碍限制了常规讨论、转诊和服务提供。虽然同一组织内的区域有几个共同的背景因素,但存在阻碍或促进实施的区域特定条件。调查结果强调,执行战略和计划的制定取决于对其发生的背景的清楚了解。这些发现为试点地区的实施计划提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal of oncology that aims to be a forum for facilitating collaboration and exchanging information on what is happening in different countries of the Asia–Pacific region in relation to cancer treatment and care. The Journal is ideally positioned to receive publications that deal with diversity in cancer behavior, management and outcome related to ethnic, cultural, economic and other differences between populations. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes reviews, editorials, letters to the Editor and short communications. Case reports are generally not considered for publication, only exceptional papers in which Editors find extraordinary oncological value may be considered for review. The Journal encourages clinical studies, particularly prospectively designed clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书