“It Will Only Work If Everyone is on Board”: A Needs and Context Assessment to Inform Exercise Oncology Implementation Within a Public Healthcare Organisation
Georgia L. White, Mary A. Kennedy, Bryan A. Chan, Hattie Wright, Grace L. Rose
{"title":"“It Will Only Work If Everyone is on Board”: A Needs and Context Assessment to Inform Exercise Oncology Implementation Within a Public Healthcare Organisation","authors":"Georgia L. White, Mary A. Kennedy, Bryan A. Chan, Hattie Wright, Grace L. Rose","doi":"10.1111/ajco.70158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Exercise has well-established benefits across the cancer continuum for people living with and beyond cancer, yet the exercise oncology field faces a research-to-practice gap. Understanding the factors that influence implementation in any given context is essential to ensure implementation strategies have the greatest likelihood of success. The study mapped onsite exercise oncology services, staff-reported implementation barriers and facilitators, organisational readiness, and experiences reported by people living with or beyond cancer, across a large public healthcare organisation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Staff and people living with and beyond cancer across cancer care centres within the public healthcare organisation completed an online survey. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and manifest content analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Across 10 regions, 115 participants completed the survey (59 staff and 56 people living with and beyond cancer). Although both groups valued and viewed exercise as important, organisation-wide and region-specific constraints were evident, particularly the absence of onsite exercise professionals and absent or unclear referral pathways. Among people living with and beyond cancer, 54% received an exercise discussion and 13% received a referral.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Across the organisation, strong support for exercise did not translate into action, as mainly outer and inner setting barriers restricted routine discussions, referrals and service delivery. Although regions within the same organisation shared several contextual factors, region-specific conditions that hindered or facilitated implementation were present. Findings reinforce that the development of implementation strategies and plans depends on a clear understanding of the context in which they will occur. These findings are informing an implementation plan in a pilot region.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":"22 6","pages":"870-880"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajco.70158","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajco.70158","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Exercise has well-established benefits across the cancer continuum for people living with and beyond cancer, yet the exercise oncology field faces a research-to-practice gap. Understanding the factors that influence implementation in any given context is essential to ensure implementation strategies have the greatest likelihood of success. The study mapped onsite exercise oncology services, staff-reported implementation barriers and facilitators, organisational readiness, and experiences reported by people living with or beyond cancer, across a large public healthcare organisation.
Methods
Staff and people living with and beyond cancer across cancer care centres within the public healthcare organisation completed an online survey. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and manifest content analysis.
Results
Across 10 regions, 115 participants completed the survey (59 staff and 56 people living with and beyond cancer). Although both groups valued and viewed exercise as important, organisation-wide and region-specific constraints were evident, particularly the absence of onsite exercise professionals and absent or unclear referral pathways. Among people living with and beyond cancer, 54% received an exercise discussion and 13% received a referral.
Conclusion
Across the organisation, strong support for exercise did not translate into action, as mainly outer and inner setting barriers restricted routine discussions, referrals and service delivery. Although regions within the same organisation shared several contextual factors, region-specific conditions that hindered or facilitated implementation were present. Findings reinforce that the development of implementation strategies and plans depends on a clear understanding of the context in which they will occur. These findings are informing an implementation plan in a pilot region.
期刊介绍:
Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal of oncology that aims to be a forum for facilitating collaboration and exchanging information on what is happening in different countries of the Asia–Pacific region in relation to cancer treatment and care. The Journal is ideally positioned to receive publications that deal with diversity in cancer behavior, management and outcome related to ethnic, cultural, economic and other differences between populations. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes reviews, editorials, letters to the Editor and short communications. Case reports are generally not considered for publication, only exceptional papers in which Editors find extraordinary oncological value may be considered for review. The Journal encourages clinical studies, particularly prospectively designed clinical trials.