EXPRESS: Confronting Cultural Appropriation: Toward the Ethical Marketing of Cultural Difference

IF 10.6 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Angela Gracia B. Cruz, Yuri Seo, Daiane Scaraboto
{"title":"EXPRESS: Confronting Cultural Appropriation: Toward the Ethical Marketing of Cultural Difference","authors":"Angela Gracia B. Cruz, Yuri Seo, Daiane Scaraboto","doi":"10.1177/00222429261478848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Brands that engage in cultural difference marketing—the use of elements from another culture to create novelty, distinction, and value—face increasing public scrutiny over the issue of potential cultural appropriation. Yet the question of how brands can ethically address this issue while continuing to pursue the benefits of cultural difference marketing remains undertheorized, leaving many brands to respond reactively. Drawing on foundational social theory and an extended qualitative study of the Korean pop (K-pop) industry, this work synthesizes key ethical concerns about cultural appropriation. It identifies three distinct facets of cultural appropriation harm that brands may inflict when using diverse cultural elements: disconnection (unfair attribution), distortion (unfair representation), and dispossession (unfair distribution of benefits). It further identifies three brand strategies that can mitigate such harm in different ways—correcting (recognizing harm through expressions of accountability), connecting (preventing harm by learning and collaborating with source cultures), and championing (resisting the structural foundations of harm through initiatives that combat marketplace inequality). Together, these findings comprise a novel framework for the ethical marketing of cultural difference. This framework disambiguates when and how cultural difference marketing may lead to cultural appropriation and theorizes the emerging role of brands as proactive mitigators of cultural appropriation harm.","PeriodicalId":16152,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marketing","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429261478848","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Brands that engage in cultural difference marketing—the use of elements from another culture to create novelty, distinction, and value—face increasing public scrutiny over the issue of potential cultural appropriation. Yet the question of how brands can ethically address this issue while continuing to pursue the benefits of cultural difference marketing remains undertheorized, leaving many brands to respond reactively. Drawing on foundational social theory and an extended qualitative study of the Korean pop (K-pop) industry, this work synthesizes key ethical concerns about cultural appropriation. It identifies three distinct facets of cultural appropriation harm that brands may inflict when using diverse cultural elements: disconnection (unfair attribution), distortion (unfair representation), and dispossession (unfair distribution of benefits). It further identifies three brand strategies that can mitigate such harm in different ways—correcting (recognizing harm through expressions of accountability), connecting (preventing harm by learning and collaborating with source cultures), and championing (resisting the structural foundations of harm through initiatives that combat marketplace inequality). Together, these findings comprise a novel framework for the ethical marketing of cultural difference. This framework disambiguates when and how cultural difference marketing may lead to cultural appropriation and theorizes the emerging role of brands as proactive mitigators of cultural appropriation harm.
直面文化挪用:走向文化差异的伦理营销
从事文化差异营销的品牌——使用来自另一种文化的元素来创造新颖性、独特性和价值——面临着越来越多的公众对潜在文化挪用问题的审查。然而,在继续追求文化差异营销的好处的同时,品牌如何在道德上解决这个问题,这个问题仍然缺乏理论依据,导致许多品牌只能被动地做出反应。借鉴基础社会理论和对韩国流行音乐(K-pop)产业的扩展定性研究,这项工作综合了有关文化挪用的关键伦理问题。它确定了品牌在使用不同的文化元素时可能造成的文化挪用危害的三个不同方面:断开连接(不公平的归属)、扭曲(不公平的表现)和剥夺(不公平的利益分配)。它进一步确定了三种可以以不同方式减轻这种伤害的品牌战略——纠正(通过表达问责意识到伤害)、连接(通过学习和与源文化合作来防止伤害)和倡导(通过打击市场不平等的举措来抵制伤害的结构性基础)。总之,这些发现构成了文化差异伦理营销的新框架。该框架消除了文化差异营销何时以及如何导致文化挪用的歧义,并将品牌作为文化挪用危害的主动缓解者的新兴角色理论化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
24.10
自引率
5.40%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Founded in 1936,the Journal of Marketing (JM) serves as a premier outlet for substantive research in marketing. JM is dedicated to developing and disseminating knowledge about real-world marketing questions, catering to scholars, educators, managers, policy makers, consumers, and other global societal stakeholders. Over the years,JM has played a crucial role in shaping the content and boundaries of the marketing discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书