The Relationship Between Writing Strategies and Writing Performance in Story Continuation Writing Tasks

IF 4.7 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Peng Bi, Lei Qi, Shipian Ji, Yuting Mao
{"title":"The Relationship Between Writing Strategies and Writing Performance in Story Continuation Writing Tasks","authors":"Peng Bi, Lei Qi, Shipian Ji, Yuting Mao","doi":"10.1177/13621688261472122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the components of writing strategies employed in the story continuation writing task (SCWT) and investigated how these strategies related to different aspects of writing performance. Specifically, it adopted factor analyses to validate the strategy subscale of Ye et al.’s (2021) writing performance questionnaire and used structural equation modeling (SEM) to explore the relationship between strategy use and writing performance, as measured by the holistic writing scores and 11 textual indices. The data comprised 330 questionnaire responses and 330 SCWT essays produced by the same group of high school English as a Foreign Language learners selected through convenience sampling. Factor analyses identified three task-specific strategy components: <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">reading_to_select</jats:italic> , <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">reading_to_organize</jats:italic> , and <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">content_developing</jats:italic> . These components represent learners’ alignment with the reading passage at the linguistic, discoursal, and situational levels and correspond to the processes of imitation, extension, and creation as conceptualized in the <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">xu</jats:italic> -argument. SEM results indicated that <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">content_developing</jats:italic> was the only strategy that exerted a significant positive effect on writing scores and enhanced semantic alignment. These findings suggest that the SCWT entails the skill of alignment, particularly with respect to learners’ ability to creatively extend the storyline presented in the reading passage. The pedagogical implications of these findings are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47852,"journal":{"name":"Language Teaching Research","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Teaching Research","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688261472122","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examined the components of writing strategies employed in the story continuation writing task (SCWT) and investigated how these strategies related to different aspects of writing performance. Specifically, it adopted factor analyses to validate the strategy subscale of Ye et al.’s (2021) writing performance questionnaire and used structural equation modeling (SEM) to explore the relationship between strategy use and writing performance, as measured by the holistic writing scores and 11 textual indices. The data comprised 330 questionnaire responses and 330 SCWT essays produced by the same group of high school English as a Foreign Language learners selected through convenience sampling. Factor analyses identified three task-specific strategy components: reading_to_select , reading_to_organize , and content_developing . These components represent learners’ alignment with the reading passage at the linguistic, discoursal, and situational levels and correspond to the processes of imitation, extension, and creation as conceptualized in the xu -argument. SEM results indicated that content_developing was the only strategy that exerted a significant positive effect on writing scores and enhanced semantic alignment. These findings suggest that the SCWT entails the skill of alignment, particularly with respect to learners’ ability to creatively extend the storyline presented in the reading passage. The pedagogical implications of these findings are discussed.
故事接续写作任务中写作策略与写作表现的关系
本研究考察了故事延续写作任务(SCWT)中所采用的写作策略的组成部分,并调查了这些策略与写作表现的不同方面的关系。具体而言,采用因子分析对Ye等人(2021)写作绩效问卷的策略子量表进行验证,并采用结构方程模型(SEM)通过整体写作得分和11个文本指标来探究策略使用与写作绩效之间的关系。数据包括330份问卷回答和330篇SCWT文章,由同一组高中英语作为外语学习者通过方便抽样选出。因子分析确定了三个特定于任务的策略组件:reading_to_select、reading_to_organize和content_developing。这些组成部分代表了学习者在语言、话语和情境层面上与阅读文章的一致性,并对应了“许”论证中所构想的模仿、延伸和创造过程。扫描电镜结果显示,内容开发是唯一对写作成绩和语义一致性有显著正向影响的策略。这些发现表明,SCWT需要对齐技能,特别是关于学习者创造性地扩展阅读文章中呈现的故事情节的能力。讨论了这些发现的教学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: Language Teaching Research is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes research within the area of second or foreign language teaching. Although articles are written in English, the journal welcomes studies dealing with the teaching of languages other than English as well. The journal is a venue for studies that demonstrate sound research methods and which report findings that have clear pedagogical implications. A wide range of topics in the area of language teaching is covered, including: -Programme -Syllabus -Materials design -Methodology -The teaching of specific skills and language for specific purposes Thorough investigation and research ensures this journal is: -International in focus, publishing work from countries worldwide -Interdisciplinary, encouraging work which seeks to break down barriers that have isolated language teaching professionals from others concerned with pedagogy -Innovative, seeking to stimulate new avenues of enquiry, including ''action'' research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书