More DMPP Is Not Always Better for Mitigating N 2 O Emissions in Subtropical Chinese Vegetable Fields

IF 4.3 2区 农林科学 Q2 SOIL SCIENCE
Zhaoying Song, Xuejuan Fang, Lijuan Zhang, Shenghui Cui, Bing Gao
{"title":"More DMPP Is Not Always Better for Mitigating N 2 O Emissions in Subtropical Chinese Vegetable Fields","authors":"Zhaoying Song, Xuejuan Fang, Lijuan Zhang, Shenghui Cui, Bing Gao","doi":"10.1111/ejss.70392","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aerobic composting of food waste for field application is considered a low‐carbon agricultural management practice relative to conventional farmers' practice, however, it poses a risk of exacerbating N <jats:sub>2</jats:sub> O emissions, particularly in subtropical acidified vegetable soils. The nitrification inhibitor DMPP (3,4‐dimethylpyrazole phosphate) can mitigate this issue, but its efficacy is contingent upon application rates and specific soil‐climate conditions. We conducted a two‐season field experiment with pakchoi and swamp cabbage in subtropical China to evaluate the effects of two DMPP application levels on soil nitrogen (N) availability, crop N uptake, yield, and N <jats:sub>2</jats:sub> O emissions under partial substitution of chemical fertilizer N with food waste aerobic compost (FWC) N. Five treatments were established: no N control (CK), conventional chemical fertilizer N (CF), 30% chicken manure N + 70% CF (MF), 30% FWC N + 70% CF (FWF), and FWF supplemented with DMPP at 2% or 5% of total CF N applied. Over the two seasons, cumulative N <jats:sub>2</jats:sub> O emissions from the CF treatment reached 21.0 kg N <jats:sub>2</jats:sub> O‐N ha <jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> . Both MF and FWF significantly increased emissions, indicating that organic N substitution enhances N <jats:sub>2</jats:sub> O release. Both DMPP dosages reduced emissions from FWF; however, the 5% dosage excessively inhibited nitrification, limiting nitrate supply and threatening yield. Notably, during the swamp cabbage season, the 2% DMPP treatment maintained yield while increasing leaf nitrate content, aboveground N uptake, and NUE (N use efficiency) by 34.6%, 22.4%, and 17.2%, respectively, and reduced N <jats:sub>2</jats:sub> O emissions by 29.1%, compared to the FWF treatment. These results suggest that DMPP is not the more the better, a 2% DMPP application, rather than excessive application, is crucial for achieving cleaner and more sustainable nutrient management in subtropical Chinese vegetable fields.","PeriodicalId":12043,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Soil Science","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.70392","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aerobic composting of food waste for field application is considered a low‐carbon agricultural management practice relative to conventional farmers' practice, however, it poses a risk of exacerbating N 2 O emissions, particularly in subtropical acidified vegetable soils. The nitrification inhibitor DMPP (3,4‐dimethylpyrazole phosphate) can mitigate this issue, but its efficacy is contingent upon application rates and specific soil‐climate conditions. We conducted a two‐season field experiment with pakchoi and swamp cabbage in subtropical China to evaluate the effects of two DMPP application levels on soil nitrogen (N) availability, crop N uptake, yield, and N 2 O emissions under partial substitution of chemical fertilizer N with food waste aerobic compost (FWC) N. Five treatments were established: no N control (CK), conventional chemical fertilizer N (CF), 30% chicken manure N + 70% CF (MF), 30% FWC N + 70% CF (FWF), and FWF supplemented with DMPP at 2% or 5% of total CF N applied. Over the two seasons, cumulative N 2 O emissions from the CF treatment reached 21.0 kg N 2 O‐N ha −1 . Both MF and FWF significantly increased emissions, indicating that organic N substitution enhances N 2 O release. Both DMPP dosages reduced emissions from FWF; however, the 5% dosage excessively inhibited nitrification, limiting nitrate supply and threatening yield. Notably, during the swamp cabbage season, the 2% DMPP treatment maintained yield while increasing leaf nitrate content, aboveground N uptake, and NUE (N use efficiency) by 34.6%, 22.4%, and 17.2%, respectively, and reduced N 2 O emissions by 29.1%, compared to the FWF treatment. These results suggest that DMPP is not the more the better, a 2% DMPP application, rather than excessive application, is crucial for achieving cleaner and more sustainable nutrient management in subtropical Chinese vegetable fields.
在中国亚热带菜地,DMPP并不一定能更好地减少氮氧化物排放
相对于传统农民的做法,将食物垃圾进行好氧堆肥用于田间应用被认为是一种低碳农业管理做法,然而,它有加剧二氧化氮排放的风险,特别是在亚热带酸化蔬菜土壤中。硝化抑制剂DMPP(3,4 -二甲基吡唑磷酸盐)可以缓解这一问题,但其效果取决于施用量和特定的土壤气候条件。本研究在中国亚热带地区以小白菜和沼泽白菜为材料,进行了2个季节的田间试验,以评价在食物垃圾好氧堆肥(FWC) N部分替代化肥N的情况下,2个DMPP施用水平对土壤氮素有效性、作物氮素吸收、产量和氮氧化物排放的影响。无氮素对照(CK)、常规化肥N (CF)、30%鸡粪N + 70% CF (MF)、30% FWC N + 70% CF (FWF)和在FWF中添加DMPP,施用量为总CF N的2%或5%。在两个季节中,CF处理的累积N 2o排放量达到21.0 kg N 2o‐N ha - 1。MF和FWF均显著增加了排放,表明有机N替代促进了n2o的释放。两种DMPP剂量都减少了FWF的排放;但5%的投加量过度抑制硝化作用,限制硝酸盐供应,威胁产量。值得注意的是,与FWF处理相比,2% DMPP处理在保持白菜产量的同时,叶片硝酸盐含量、地上氮吸收和氮素利用效率分别提高了34.6%、22.4%和17.2%,氮氧化物排放量减少了29.1%。综上所述,DMPP并不是越多越好,施用2%的DMPP,而不是过量施用,对实现中国亚热带菜田更清洁、更可持续的养分管理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Soil Science
European Journal of Soil Science 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: The EJSS is an international journal that publishes outstanding papers in soil science that advance the theoretical and mechanistic understanding of physical, chemical and biological processes and their interactions in soils acting from molecular to continental scales in natural and managed environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书