{"title":"Pain Expectation in Individuals With High Autistic Traits: Decision–Evaluation Processes and Oxytocin Modulation","authors":"Jiafeng Zhu, Shihao Chen, Wenting Zhang, Jia Li, Xinxin Lin, Richu Jin, Weiwei Peng","doi":"10.1111/nyas.70365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Pain reflects both sensory input and predictive processes shaped by expectations. Individuals with high autistic traits (HATs) often exhibit atypical pain responses, potentially due to alterations in anticipatory processing. This study investigated pain anticipation in HAT individuals and examined the modulatory effects of oxytocin using behavioral, computational, and pharmacological approaches. In experiment 1, HAT and low autistic trait (LAT) individuals completed a cue-based pain anticipation task. Anticipatory processing was characterized through two components: decision-related processes and evaluative responses. HAT individuals showed altered decision-making, characterized by greater caution under uncertainty and reduced processing efficiency under certain high-pain conditions. They also exhibited more negative evaluative responses, which were associated with poorer psychological health. In experiment 2, HAT participants received intranasal oxytocin or placebo. Oxytocin selectively influenced decision-related processes under uncertainty, increasing evidence accumulation and reducing nondecision time while also increasing the tendency to choose high-pain outcomes under ambiguous conditions. In contrast, oxytocin showed limited effects on evaluative measures. These findings suggest that pain anticipation in HAT individuals involves partially distinct decision-related and evaluative components and that oxytocin exerts process-specific effects on anticipatory processing.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":8250,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","volume":"1562 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nyas.70365","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Pain reflects both sensory input and predictive processes shaped by expectations. Individuals with high autistic traits (HATs) often exhibit atypical pain responses, potentially due to alterations in anticipatory processing. This study investigated pain anticipation in HAT individuals and examined the modulatory effects of oxytocin using behavioral, computational, and pharmacological approaches. In experiment 1, HAT and low autistic trait (LAT) individuals completed a cue-based pain anticipation task. Anticipatory processing was characterized through two components: decision-related processes and evaluative responses. HAT individuals showed altered decision-making, characterized by greater caution under uncertainty and reduced processing efficiency under certain high-pain conditions. They also exhibited more negative evaluative responses, which were associated with poorer psychological health. In experiment 2, HAT participants received intranasal oxytocin or placebo. Oxytocin selectively influenced decision-related processes under uncertainty, increasing evidence accumulation and reducing nondecision time while also increasing the tendency to choose high-pain outcomes under ambiguous conditions. In contrast, oxytocin showed limited effects on evaluative measures. These findings suggest that pain anticipation in HAT individuals involves partially distinct decision-related and evaluative components and that oxytocin exerts process-specific effects on anticipatory processing.
期刊介绍:
Published on behalf of the New York Academy of Sciences, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences provides multidisciplinary perspectives on research of current scientific interest with far-reaching implications for the wider scientific community and society at large. Each special issue assembles the best thinking of key contributors to a field of investigation at a time when emerging developments offer the promise of new insight. Individually themed, Annals special issues stimulate new ways to think about science by providing a neutral forum for discourse—within and across many institutions and fields.