When 'Clean' is not clean: a diagnostic pitfall in Gram staining leading to pseudobacterial meningitis.

Access microbiology Pub Date : 2026-08-10 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1099/acmi.0.001219.v3
Takayuki Kawamura, Sachie Koyama, Haruka Karaushi, Yasuhiro Ebihara, Kotaro Mitsutake
{"title":"When 'Clean' is not clean: a diagnostic pitfall in Gram staining leading to pseudobacterial meningitis.","authors":"Takayuki Kawamura, Sachie Koyama, Haruka Karaushi, Yasuhiro Ebihara, Kotaro Mitsutake","doi":"10.1099/acmi.0.001219.v3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Gram staining is a fundamental and widely used technique in clinical microbiology because of its simplicity and diagnostic value, particularly in the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis. However, its reliability may be compromised by contamination and staining artefacts. <b>Case Presentation.</b> This report describes a case of pseudobacterial meningitis in a previously healthy 25-year-old woman who presented with fever, headache and nuchal rigidity. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis revealed pleocytosis with a predominance of mononuclear cells. Gram staining revealed findings consistent with Gram-negative bacilli, prompting empiric antibacterial therapy with concurrent antiviral treatment. Comprehensive microbiological investigations, including CSF culture and broad-range 16S rRNA PCR testing, yielded negative results. Residual material or microscopic debris on supposedly 'clean' slides was suspected to produce artefact-like appearances that mimicked micro-organisms, leading to false-positive interpretations. <b>Conclusion.</b> This case highlights a potential laboratory pitfall in the interpretation of CSF Gram stains and underscores the importance of considering staining artefacts, particularly when Gram stain findings are discordant with the overall clinical and laboratory findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":94366,"journal":{"name":"Access microbiology","volume":"8 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13456105/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Access microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/acmi.0.001219.v3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Gram staining is a fundamental and widely used technique in clinical microbiology because of its simplicity and diagnostic value, particularly in the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis. However, its reliability may be compromised by contamination and staining artefacts. Case Presentation. This report describes a case of pseudobacterial meningitis in a previously healthy 25-year-old woman who presented with fever, headache and nuchal rigidity. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis revealed pleocytosis with a predominance of mononuclear cells. Gram staining revealed findings consistent with Gram-negative bacilli, prompting empiric antibacterial therapy with concurrent antiviral treatment. Comprehensive microbiological investigations, including CSF culture and broad-range 16S rRNA PCR testing, yielded negative results. Residual material or microscopic debris on supposedly 'clean' slides was suspected to produce artefact-like appearances that mimicked micro-organisms, leading to false-positive interpretations. Conclusion. This case highlights a potential laboratory pitfall in the interpretation of CSF Gram stains and underscores the importance of considering staining artefacts, particularly when Gram stain findings are discordant with the overall clinical and laboratory findings.

当“干净”不干净时:革兰氏染色导致假细菌性脑膜炎的诊断缺陷。
介绍。革兰氏染色是临床微生物学的一项基础和广泛应用的技术,因为它的简单和诊断价值,特别是在诊断细菌性脑膜炎。然而,它的可靠性可能会受到污染和染色的人工制品。例演示。本报告描述了一例假细菌性脑膜炎在一个以前健康的25岁妇女谁提出发烧,头痛和颈部僵硬。脑脊液(CSF)分析显示单核细胞增多症。革兰氏染色显示的结果与革兰氏阴性杆菌一致,提示经验性抗菌治疗与抗病毒治疗同时进行。全面的微生物学调查,包括脑脊液培养和广泛的16S rRNA PCR检测,结果均为阴性。据称“干净”的载玻片上的残留物质或微观碎片被怀疑会产生模仿微生物的人工制品样外观,从而导致假阳性解释。结论。该病例强调了在解释脑脊液革兰氏染色时潜在的实验室缺陷,并强调了考虑染色伪影的重要性,特别是当革兰氏染色结果与整体临床和实验室结果不一致时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书