Machine learning-based prediction of subjective cognitive impairment levels in cancer survivors using demographic predictors.

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ali Jafarian, Fatemeh Keshmiri Nasrabadi, Mehrshad Khosraviani
{"title":"Machine learning-based prediction of subjective cognitive impairment levels in cancer survivors using demographic predictors.","authors":"Ali Jafarian, Fatemeh Keshmiri Nasrabadi, Mehrshad Khosraviani","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2026.2716173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cancer-related cognitive impairment is a decline in cognitive functioning following cancer treatment that negatively affects survivors' quality of life. Self-report tools such as the Cognitive Failure Questionnaire (CFQ) offer a rapid and cost-effective method for early detection of subjective cognitive difficulties. This study aimed to develop and compare machine learning models using demographic variables to classify subjective cognitive impairment (SCI) severity into low, moderate, and high levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 437 cancer survivors were analyzed. SCI severity was defined based on self-reported CFQ scores. Demographic predictors included age, gender, marital status, education, and occupation. Four supervised machine learning algorithms, Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), were applied for multiclass classification. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), F1-score and area under the ROC curve (AUC), with stratified 5-fold cross-validation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LR model demonstrated the best performance (accuracy = 0.89, AUC = 0.95), followed by SVM (accuracy = 0.86, AUC = 0.95), ANN (accuracy = 0.85, AUC = 0.93), and KNN (accuracy = 0.82, AUC = 0.91).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Logistic Regression provided the most robust and interpretable results. These findings support the utility of simple demographic-based models as noninvasive tools that may support early supportive screening of subjective cognitive difficulties in cancer survivorship care. However, external validation using independent datasets is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2026.2716173","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Cancer-related cognitive impairment is a decline in cognitive functioning following cancer treatment that negatively affects survivors' quality of life. Self-report tools such as the Cognitive Failure Questionnaire (CFQ) offer a rapid and cost-effective method for early detection of subjective cognitive difficulties. This study aimed to develop and compare machine learning models using demographic variables to classify subjective cognitive impairment (SCI) severity into low, moderate, and high levels.

Methods: Data from 437 cancer survivors were analyzed. SCI severity was defined based on self-reported CFQ scores. Demographic predictors included age, gender, marital status, education, and occupation. Four supervised machine learning algorithms, Logistic Regression (LR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), were applied for multiclass classification. Model performance was evaluated using accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), F1-score and area under the ROC curve (AUC), with stratified 5-fold cross-validation.

Results: LR model demonstrated the best performance (accuracy = 0.89, AUC = 0.95), followed by SVM (accuracy = 0.86, AUC = 0.95), ANN (accuracy = 0.85, AUC = 0.93), and KNN (accuracy = 0.82, AUC = 0.91).

Conclusion: Logistic Regression provided the most robust and interpretable results. These findings support the utility of simple demographic-based models as noninvasive tools that may support early supportive screening of subjective cognitive difficulties in cancer survivorship care. However, external validation using independent datasets is required.

基于机器学习的人口统计学预测癌症幸存者主观认知障碍水平的预测。
目的:癌症相关认知障碍是癌症治疗后认知功能的下降,对幸存者的生活质量产生负面影响。认知失败问卷(CFQ)等自我报告工具为早期发现主观认知困难提供了一种快速、经济的方法。本研究旨在开发和比较使用人口统计学变量的机器学习模型,将主观认知障碍(SCI)严重程度分为低、中、高水平。方法:对437例癌症幸存者的资料进行分析。根据自我报告的CFQ评分来定义SCI严重程度。人口统计预测因素包括年龄、性别、婚姻状况、教育程度和职业。采用Logistic回归(LR)、支持向量机(SVM)、人工神经网络(ANN)和k近邻(KNN)四种监督式机器学习算法进行多类分类。采用准确性、敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、f1评分和ROC曲线下面积(AUC)评价模型的性能,并进行分层5重交叉验证。结果:LR模型表现最佳(准确率为0.89,AUC = 0.95),其次是SVM(准确率为0.86,AUC = 0.95)、ANN(准确率为0.85,AUC = 0.93)和KNN(准确率为0.82,AUC = 0.91)。结论:Logistic回归提供了最稳健和可解释的结果。这些发现支持简单的基于人口统计学的模型作为非侵入性工具的效用,可以支持癌症生存护理中主观认知困难的早期支持性筛查。但是,需要使用独立数据集进行外部验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书