Patient-Reported Quality of Life in Lung Transplantation: Prospective Cohort Study.

IF 3.3 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Peng Li, Jiawei Wang, Hongyi Wang, Shuo Li, Lei Wang, Shan Gao, Chunxiao Hu, Guangjian Zhang
{"title":"Patient-Reported Quality of Life in Lung Transplantation: Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Peng Li, Jiawei Wang, Hongyi Wang, Shuo Li, Lei Wang, Shan Gao, Chunxiao Hu, Guangjian Zhang","doi":"10.2196/86211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung transplantation (LTx) is an established treatment for patients with end-stage lung diseases and can substantially improve survival. However, posttransplant recovery involves complex physical, psychological, and functional challenges, making quality of life (QoL) an important outcome beyond survival alone. Evidence on early longitudinal QoL changes after LTx remains limited, particularly in Chinese recipients and when assessed using disease-specific patient-reported outcome instruments.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess QoL and track its longitudinal changes in patients who underwent LTx using a disease-specific patient-reported outcome instrument.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center prospective cohort study screened 66 patients for enrollment who underwent LTx at the Xi'an Jiaotong University Lung Transplantation Center in China from June 2023 to December 2025. QoL was assessed using the Chinese version of the Lung Transplant Quality of Life questionnaire at baseline (preoperative) and serially at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 months after surgery. The Lung Transplant Quality of Life questionnaire comprises 40 items across 7 domains, and each domain score was calculated as the item mean (range 0-4). Random-intercept linear mixed models (LMMs) with both categorical and linear time specifications were fitted separately for each domain to evaluate longitudinal changes, accounting for repeated measures and incomplete follow-up under the missing at random assumption.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 203 interviews from 51 eligible patients were included in this study, with a median of 5 (IQR 2-6) interviews for each patient. LMM analysis revealed significant overall time effects in 6 of 7 domains (likelihood ratio test: P<.01 in all cases). Health perceptions showed the earliest and largest improvement (LMM-adjusted mean difference [MD] -1.58 at month 6; β=-0.23 points per month; P<.001), followed by respiratory symptoms (MD -0.95 at month 6; β=-0.15 per month), anxiety and depression (MD -0.82 at month 6; β=-0.13 per month), digestive symptoms (MD -0.50 at month 6; β=-0.10 per month), and cognitive limitations (MD -0.51 at month 6; β=-0.09 per month; P<.001 in all cases). Global well-being was the only domain with a positive trajectory (MD 1.18 at month 6; β=0.13 per month; P=.002), with significant improvement already evident at month 1 (MD 0.71; P=.23).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LTx significantly improved QoL in patients with end-stage lung diseases, with the most substantial gains in health perceptions and respiratory symptoms. Patient-reported outcome-based monitoring can capture clinically meaningful QoL changes and should be integrated into routine posttransplant care to identify critical intervention time points and optimize long-term recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":51757,"journal":{"name":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","volume":"15 ","pages":"e86211"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13457444/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interactive Journal of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/86211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lung transplantation (LTx) is an established treatment for patients with end-stage lung diseases and can substantially improve survival. However, posttransplant recovery involves complex physical, psychological, and functional challenges, making quality of life (QoL) an important outcome beyond survival alone. Evidence on early longitudinal QoL changes after LTx remains limited, particularly in Chinese recipients and when assessed using disease-specific patient-reported outcome instruments.

Objective: This study aimed to assess QoL and track its longitudinal changes in patients who underwent LTx using a disease-specific patient-reported outcome instrument.

Methods: This single-center prospective cohort study screened 66 patients for enrollment who underwent LTx at the Xi'an Jiaotong University Lung Transplantation Center in China from June 2023 to December 2025. QoL was assessed using the Chinese version of the Lung Transplant Quality of Life questionnaire at baseline (preoperative) and serially at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 months after surgery. The Lung Transplant Quality of Life questionnaire comprises 40 items across 7 domains, and each domain score was calculated as the item mean (range 0-4). Random-intercept linear mixed models (LMMs) with both categorical and linear time specifications were fitted separately for each domain to evaluate longitudinal changes, accounting for repeated measures and incomplete follow-up under the missing at random assumption.

Results: A total of 203 interviews from 51 eligible patients were included in this study, with a median of 5 (IQR 2-6) interviews for each patient. LMM analysis revealed significant overall time effects in 6 of 7 domains (likelihood ratio test: P<.01 in all cases). Health perceptions showed the earliest and largest improvement (LMM-adjusted mean difference [MD] -1.58 at month 6; β=-0.23 points per month; P<.001), followed by respiratory symptoms (MD -0.95 at month 6; β=-0.15 per month), anxiety and depression (MD -0.82 at month 6; β=-0.13 per month), digestive symptoms (MD -0.50 at month 6; β=-0.10 per month), and cognitive limitations (MD -0.51 at month 6; β=-0.09 per month; P<.001 in all cases). Global well-being was the only domain with a positive trajectory (MD 1.18 at month 6; β=0.13 per month; P=.002), with significant improvement already evident at month 1 (MD 0.71; P=.23).

Conclusions: LTx significantly improved QoL in patients with end-stage lung diseases, with the most substantial gains in health perceptions and respiratory symptoms. Patient-reported outcome-based monitoring can capture clinically meaningful QoL changes and should be integrated into routine posttransplant care to identify critical intervention time points and optimize long-term recovery.

肺移植患者报告的生活质量:前瞻性队列研究。
背景:肺移植(LTx)是终末期肺部疾病患者的一种成熟的治疗方法,可以显著提高生存率。然而,移植后恢复涉及复杂的生理、心理和功能挑战,使生活质量(QoL)成为比生存本身更重要的结果。LTx后早期纵向生活质量变化的证据仍然有限,特别是在中国接受者中,当使用特定疾病的患者报告的结果工具进行评估时。目的:本研究旨在评估LTx患者的生活质量,并使用疾病特异性患者报告的结果工具跟踪其纵向变化。方法:这项单中心前瞻性队列研究筛选了2023年6月至2025年12月在中国西安交通大学肺移植中心接受LTx的66例患者。在基线(术前)和术后1、2、3、4、5和6个月分别使用中文版肺移植生活质量问卷评估生活质量。肺移植生活质量问卷包括7个领域的40个项目,每个领域的得分计算为项目的平均值(范围0-4)。在每个域分别拟合具有分类和线性时间规范的随机截距线性混合模型(lmm),以评估纵向变化,考虑到随机假设缺失下的重复测量和不完全随访。结果:本研究共纳入了51例符合条件的患者的203次访谈,每位患者的中位访谈为5次(IQR 2-6)。LMM分析显示,在7个领域中,有6个领域的总体时间效应显著(似然比检验:p)。结论:LTx显著改善了终末期肺病患者的生活质量,其中健康感知和呼吸症状的改善最为显著。患者报告的基于结果的监测可以捕获临床有意义的生活质量变化,应纳入常规移植后护理,以确定关键干预时间点并优化长期恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interactive Journal of Medical Research
Interactive Journal of Medical Research MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书