Social competition shapes motor response execution and inhibition in a Go/NoGo task: Behavioral, signal-detection, and ERP evidence.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Cuihong Liu, Guoliang Chen, Bing Zhang, Yansong Li
{"title":"Social competition shapes motor response execution and inhibition in a Go/NoGo task: Behavioral, signal-detection, and ERP evidence.","authors":"Cuihong Liu, Guoliang Chen, Bing Zhang, Yansong Li","doi":"10.3758/s13415-026-01487-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study examined how social competition modulates motor response execution and inhibition using behavioral, signal-detection, and event-related potential measures. Forty-three participants completed a Go/NoGo (GNG) task under social-competition and control conditions while EEG was recorded. Relative to control, social competition shortened Go-trial reaction times (RTs) without reducing accuracy, and greater RT speeding was associated with larger increases in the rated importance of response speed. Competition also increased NoGo commission errors, reflecting reduced Go/NoGo discriminability (lower d') and a more liberal response criterion (C). Neurally, NoGo trials elicited larger N2 and P3 amplitudes than Go trials, whereas competition enhanced both Go-P3 and NoGo-P3 amplitudes without reliably modulating the N2. Go-P3 amplitude, maximal over centro-parietal/parietal sites, was negatively associated with Go RTs in the control condition. Competition-related increases in Go-P3 amplitude were associated with greater Go-RT speeding and statistically mediated the effect of competition on Go RTs, suggesting greater engagement of an stimulus-response (S-R) mapping process that translates task-relevant stimulus features into the appropriate Go-response representation. NoGo-P3 amplitude, maximal over frontocentral/central sites, was not significantly associated with commission errors or d' in the control condition. However, competition-related increases in NoGo-P3 amplitude were associated with increased commission errors and reduced d' and statistically mediated both effects. This pattern suggests that enhanced NoGo-P3 amplitude reflects increased demands for reactive control under a heightened prepotent Go tendency. Overall, social competition preferentially modulated P3-indexed, time-resolved control processes during motor response execution and inhibition, facilitating faster but still accurate motor response execution while impairing response withholding.</p>","PeriodicalId":50672,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-026-01487-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study examined how social competition modulates motor response execution and inhibition using behavioral, signal-detection, and event-related potential measures. Forty-three participants completed a Go/NoGo (GNG) task under social-competition and control conditions while EEG was recorded. Relative to control, social competition shortened Go-trial reaction times (RTs) without reducing accuracy, and greater RT speeding was associated with larger increases in the rated importance of response speed. Competition also increased NoGo commission errors, reflecting reduced Go/NoGo discriminability (lower d') and a more liberal response criterion (C). Neurally, NoGo trials elicited larger N2 and P3 amplitudes than Go trials, whereas competition enhanced both Go-P3 and NoGo-P3 amplitudes without reliably modulating the N2. Go-P3 amplitude, maximal over centro-parietal/parietal sites, was negatively associated with Go RTs in the control condition. Competition-related increases in Go-P3 amplitude were associated with greater Go-RT speeding and statistically mediated the effect of competition on Go RTs, suggesting greater engagement of an stimulus-response (S-R) mapping process that translates task-relevant stimulus features into the appropriate Go-response representation. NoGo-P3 amplitude, maximal over frontocentral/central sites, was not significantly associated with commission errors or d' in the control condition. However, competition-related increases in NoGo-P3 amplitude were associated with increased commission errors and reduced d' and statistically mediated both effects. This pattern suggests that enhanced NoGo-P3 amplitude reflects increased demands for reactive control under a heightened prepotent Go tendency. Overall, social competition preferentially modulated P3-indexed, time-resolved control processes during motor response execution and inhibition, facilitating faster but still accurate motor response execution while impairing response withholding.

社会竞争在Go/NoGo任务中塑造运动反应执行和抑制:行为,信号检测和ERP证据。
本研究考察了社会竞争如何通过行为、信号检测和事件相关电位测量来调节运动反应的执行和抑制。43名被试在社会竞争和控制条件下完成了Go/NoGo (GNG)任务,同时记录了脑电图。与对照组相比,社会竞争缩短了Go-trial反应时间(RTs),但没有降低准确性,而且更快的RT速度与反应速度的重要性评级增加幅度较大相关。竞争也增加了NoGo佣金错误,反映了Go/NoGo可区别性的降低(较低d')和更自由的响应标准(C)。在神经上,NoGo试验比Go试验激发了更大的N2和P3振幅,而竞争增强了Go-P3和NoGo-P3振幅,但没有可靠地调节N2。在对照条件下,Go- p3振幅与Go RTs呈负相关,在顶叶中心/顶叶部位最大。与竞争相关的Go- p3振幅增加与Go- rt加速有关,并在统计上介导了竞争对Go- rt的影响,这表明刺激-反应(S-R)映射过程的参与程度更高,该过程将任务相关的刺激特征转化为适当的Go-反应表征。在对照条件下,NoGo-P3振幅在额中央/中心位置最大,与操作误差或d'无显著相关。然而,竞争相关的NoGo-P3振幅的增加与佣金误差的增加和d'的减少有关,并在统计上介导了这两种效应。这种模式表明,NoGo-P3振幅的增强反映了在强氧化倾向下反应性控制需求的增加。总体而言,社会竞争优先调节运动反应执行和抑制过程中以p3为索引的、时间分辨的控制过程,促进更快但仍然准确的运动反应执行,同时损害反应抑制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience (CABN) offers theoretical, review, and primary research articles on behavior and brain processes in humans. Coverage includes normal function as well as patients with injuries or processes that influence brain function: neurological disorders, including both healthy and disordered aging; and psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and depression. CABN is the leading vehicle for strongly psychologically motivated studies of brain–behavior relationships, through the presentation of papers that integrate psychological theory and the conduct and interpretation of the neuroscientific data. The range of topics includes perception, attention, memory, language, problem solving, reasoning, and decision-making; emotional processes, motivation, reward prediction, and affective states; and individual differences in relevant domains, including personality. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience is a publication of the Psychonomic Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书