The selective dynamics of proactive and reactive control in GAD: A taVNS study using hierarchical drift diffusion modeling.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Shuliang Bai, Peibing Liu, Fangfang Long, Ruiming Wang
{"title":"The selective dynamics of proactive and reactive control in GAD: A taVNS study using hierarchical drift diffusion modeling.","authors":"Shuliang Bai, Peibing Liu, Fangfang Long, Ruiming Wang","doi":"10.3758/s13415-026-01486-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anxiety has been linked to mode-specific dysregulation in cognitive control, characterized by reduced proactive maintenance and heightened reliance on reactive engagement. Yet many neuromodulation studies implicitly assume a unitary enhancement of control. We tested whether acute transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) produces global or context-dependent changes in cognitive control. Thirty-one individuals with generalized anxiety disorder completed a within-subject, single-blind, counterbalanced study comparing active and sham taVNS across two sessions. Participants performed the AX Continuous Performance Task, which dissociates proactive and reactive control demands. Conventional behavioral indices, including reaction time, accuracy, d'-context, and proactive behavioral indices, did not show reliable stimulation-specific changes. Hierarchical drift diffusion modeling further suggested that stimulation-related effects were subtle and uncertain. A modest directional pattern emerged for boundary separation in AY trials, where active taVNS appeared to preserve decision caution relative to a sham-related decline; however, the 95% HDI included zero. Structural and RT-threshold sensitivity analyses retained the positive direction of this contrast but did not remove its uncertainty. These findings do not establish a robust enhancement of cognitive control, but provide limited preliminary evidence for possible context-dependent preservation of decision gating.</p>","PeriodicalId":50672,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-026-01486-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anxiety has been linked to mode-specific dysregulation in cognitive control, characterized by reduced proactive maintenance and heightened reliance on reactive engagement. Yet many neuromodulation studies implicitly assume a unitary enhancement of control. We tested whether acute transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) produces global or context-dependent changes in cognitive control. Thirty-one individuals with generalized anxiety disorder completed a within-subject, single-blind, counterbalanced study comparing active and sham taVNS across two sessions. Participants performed the AX Continuous Performance Task, which dissociates proactive and reactive control demands. Conventional behavioral indices, including reaction time, accuracy, d'-context, and proactive behavioral indices, did not show reliable stimulation-specific changes. Hierarchical drift diffusion modeling further suggested that stimulation-related effects were subtle and uncertain. A modest directional pattern emerged for boundary separation in AY trials, where active taVNS appeared to preserve decision caution relative to a sham-related decline; however, the 95% HDI included zero. Structural and RT-threshold sensitivity analyses retained the positive direction of this contrast but did not remove its uncertainty. These findings do not establish a robust enhancement of cognitive control, but provide limited preliminary evidence for possible context-dependent preservation of decision gating.

GAD中主动和被动控制的选择性动力学:基于分层漂移扩散模型的taVNS研究。
焦虑与认知控制的模式特异性失调有关,其特征是主动性维护减少,对反应性参与的依赖增加。然而,许多神经调节研究隐含地假设了控制的单一增强。我们测试了急性经皮耳迷走神经刺激(taVNS)是否在认知控制中产生全局或情境依赖的变化。31名广泛性焦虑障碍患者完成了一项受试者内单盲平衡研究,比较了两个疗程的主动和虚假taVNS。参与者完成了AX连续绩效任务,该任务分离了主动控制需求和被动控制需求。传统的行为指标,包括反应时间、准确性、情境和主动行为指标,没有显示出可靠的刺激特异性变化。分层漂移扩散模型进一步表明,刺激相关的影响是微妙和不确定的。在AY试验中,边界分离出现了适度的定向模式,其中活跃的taVNS似乎相对于假性相关的衰退保持了决策谨慎;然而,95%的HDI包括零。结构和rt阈值敏感性分析保留了这种对比的积极方向,但没有消除其不确定性。这些发现并没有建立一个强大的认知控制的增强,但提供有限的初步证据,为决策门控可能的上下文依赖的保存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience (CABN) offers theoretical, review, and primary research articles on behavior and brain processes in humans. Coverage includes normal function as well as patients with injuries or processes that influence brain function: neurological disorders, including both healthy and disordered aging; and psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and depression. CABN is the leading vehicle for strongly psychologically motivated studies of brain–behavior relationships, through the presentation of papers that integrate psychological theory and the conduct and interpretation of the neuroscientific data. The range of topics includes perception, attention, memory, language, problem solving, reasoning, and decision-making; emotional processes, motivation, reward prediction, and affective states; and individual differences in relevant domains, including personality. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience is a publication of the Psychonomic Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书