{"title":"Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of Oral Camlipixant: A Randomized First-In-Human Study Using Single and Multiple Ascending Doses","authors":"Nathalie Chauret MSc, Denis Garceau PhD, Laurent Harvey MSc, Zelie Bailes MSc, Elizabeth A. Duncan MD, PhD, Rhian McNaughton PhD, Miren Zamacona PhD","doi":"10.1002/jcph.70253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Camlipixant is a highly selective P2X3 receptor antagonist with demonstrated efficacy in pre-clinical models of evoked cough. We report the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of camlipixant in healthy participants. This Phase 1, double-blind, randomized study evaluated single ascending doses (SAD; 50/100/200/400/800/1200 mg) and multiple ascending doses (MAD; 100/200/400 mg, twice daily [BID]) of oral camlipixant versus placebo. Ninety participants were included (SAD n = 60; MAD n = 30). Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) incidence was similar between camlipixant (32/72) and placebo (9/18). TEAEs were mostly mild (83%), and the most common with camlipixant was dysgeusia, primarily at doses ≥400 mg (n = 13), versus 50–200 mg (n = 1). Camlipixant was rapidly absorbed (time to maximum plasma concentration SAD: 0.77–2.29 h; MAD: 0.50–2.00 h), with a short half-life (SAD 4.28–6.71 h; MAD 7.60–8.39 h). In both cohorts, maximum plasma concentration (C<sub>max</sub>) increased proportionally with dose. The area under the curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC<sub>0–∞</sub>) increased proportionally with dose in the SAD cohort; the increase was slightly supra-proportional in the MAD cohort (steady state reached on Day 2). The geometric mean apparent volume of distribution ranged from 44.9 to 70.2 L and clearance from 5.7 to 10.4 L/h in the SAD cohort. Pharmacokinetics were unaffected by food (geometric mean fed/fasted ratio C<sub>max</sub> 91.4% [90% confidence interval, CI, 69.8–119.6]; AUC<sub>0–∞</sub> 105.5% [90% CI, 89.8–124.0]). In summary, camlipixant was well tolerated, with pharmacokinetics supporting BID dosing and further clinical development for refractory chronic cough.</p>","PeriodicalId":22751,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":"66 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcph.70253","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcph.70253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Camlipixant is a highly selective P2X3 receptor antagonist with demonstrated efficacy in pre-clinical models of evoked cough. We report the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of camlipixant in healthy participants. This Phase 1, double-blind, randomized study evaluated single ascending doses (SAD; 50/100/200/400/800/1200 mg) and multiple ascending doses (MAD; 100/200/400 mg, twice daily [BID]) of oral camlipixant versus placebo. Ninety participants were included (SAD n = 60; MAD n = 30). Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) incidence was similar between camlipixant (32/72) and placebo (9/18). TEAEs were mostly mild (83%), and the most common with camlipixant was dysgeusia, primarily at doses ≥400 mg (n = 13), versus 50–200 mg (n = 1). Camlipixant was rapidly absorbed (time to maximum plasma concentration SAD: 0.77–2.29 h; MAD: 0.50–2.00 h), with a short half-life (SAD 4.28–6.71 h; MAD 7.60–8.39 h). In both cohorts, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) increased proportionally with dose. The area under the curve extrapolated to infinity (AUC0–∞) increased proportionally with dose in the SAD cohort; the increase was slightly supra-proportional in the MAD cohort (steady state reached on Day 2). The geometric mean apparent volume of distribution ranged from 44.9 to 70.2 L and clearance from 5.7 to 10.4 L/h in the SAD cohort. Pharmacokinetics were unaffected by food (geometric mean fed/fasted ratio Cmax 91.4% [90% confidence interval, CI, 69.8–119.6]; AUC0–∞ 105.5% [90% CI, 89.8–124.0]). In summary, camlipixant was well tolerated, with pharmacokinetics supporting BID dosing and further clinical development for refractory chronic cough.