Age differences in incidental learning of emotional information.

IF 3.6 1区 心理学 Q1 GERONTOLOGY
Meital Friedman-Oskar, Hadas Okon-Singer, Tal Makovski
{"title":"Age differences in incidental learning of emotional information.","authors":"Meital Friedman-Oskar, Hadas Okon-Singer, Tal Makovski","doi":"10.1037/pag0001015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research has consistently shown an age-related positivity effect, in which older adults show relatively less negativity and/or relatively greater positivity in memory compared with younger adults. This study examined age-related differences in incidental learning of emotional stimuli, specifically examining how emotional valence influences memory within the framework of the visual statistical learning task. Participants across two age groups (young and older adults) viewed streams of object images with varying emotional valences (negative, positive, neutral) organized into triplets, unaware of their underlying structure. Subsequently, participants completed both a recognition test, assessing their ability to identify previously encountered triplets, and a free recall task. Results revealed no significant differences in overall visual statistical learning performance between age groups, indicating that the ability to extract statistical regularities remains stable across the lifespan. Interestingly, the pattern differed across tasks: In visual statistical learning, both age groups showed a robust advantage for negative over neutral triplets and no benefit for positive stimuli, whereas in free recall, older adults preferentially remembered positive images. This suggests that age-related positivity effects, which reliably emerge in free recall, do not necessarily generalize to prediction-based statistical learning and that negative emotion remains particularly effective in supporting the incidental extraction of regularities across the lifespan. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48426,"journal":{"name":"Psychology and Aging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology and Aging","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0001015","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research has consistently shown an age-related positivity effect, in which older adults show relatively less negativity and/or relatively greater positivity in memory compared with younger adults. This study examined age-related differences in incidental learning of emotional stimuli, specifically examining how emotional valence influences memory within the framework of the visual statistical learning task. Participants across two age groups (young and older adults) viewed streams of object images with varying emotional valences (negative, positive, neutral) organized into triplets, unaware of their underlying structure. Subsequently, participants completed both a recognition test, assessing their ability to identify previously encountered triplets, and a free recall task. Results revealed no significant differences in overall visual statistical learning performance between age groups, indicating that the ability to extract statistical regularities remains stable across the lifespan. Interestingly, the pattern differed across tasks: In visual statistical learning, both age groups showed a robust advantage for negative over neutral triplets and no benefit for positive stimuli, whereas in free recall, older adults preferentially remembered positive images. This suggests that age-related positivity effects, which reliably emerge in free recall, do not necessarily generalize to prediction-based statistical learning and that negative emotion remains particularly effective in supporting the incidental extraction of regularities across the lifespan. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

情绪信息附带学习的年龄差异。
先前的研究一直显示出与年龄相关的积极效应,与年轻人相比,老年人在记忆中表现出相对较少的消极和/或相对较高的积极。本研究考察了情绪刺激附带学习的年龄相关差异,特别是考察了在视觉统计学习任务框架内情绪效价如何影响记忆。两个年龄组的参与者(年轻人和老年人)观看了三组不同情绪效价(消极、积极、中性)的物体图像流,他们不知道这些图像的潜在结构。随后,参与者完成了一项识别测试,评估他们识别以前遇到的三胞胎的能力,以及一项自由回忆任务。结果显示,整体视觉统计学习表现在年龄组之间没有显著差异,表明提取统计规律的能力在整个生命周期中保持稳定。有趣的是,这种模式在不同的任务中有所不同:在视觉统计学习中,两个年龄段的人对消极的三联图比中性的三联图有明显的优势,对积极的三联图没有任何好处,而在自由回忆中,老年人更倾向于记住积极的图像。这表明,与年龄相关的积极效应,可靠地出现在自由回忆中,并不一定会推广到基于预测的统计学习中,而负面情绪在支持整个生命周期中偶然提取规律方面仍然特别有效。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
10.80%
发文量
97
期刊介绍: Psychology and Aging publishes original articles on adult development and aging. Such original articles include reports of research that may be applied, biobehavioral, clinical, educational, experimental (laboratory, field, or naturalistic studies), methodological, or psychosocial. Although the emphasis is on original research investigations, occasional theoretical analyses of research issues, practical clinical problems, or policy may appear, as well as critical reviews of a content area in adult development and aging. Clinical case studies that have theoretical significance are also appropriate. Brief reports are acceptable with the author"s agreement not to submit a full report to another journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书