Effects of a Smartphone-Based Mindfulness Intervention on Momentary Stress Among First Responders: a Micro-Randomized Trial.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tiffany Tran, Sun-Kyung Lee, Susanne Lee, Amberlee Martin, Abigail H Gewirtz
{"title":"Effects of a Smartphone-Based Mindfulness Intervention on Momentary Stress Among First Responders: a Micro-Randomized Trial.","authors":"Tiffany Tran, Sun-Kyung Lee, Susanne Lee, Amberlee Martin, Abigail H Gewirtz","doi":"10.1007/s11121-026-01957-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>First responders face extreme workplace stressors that can increase symptoms of distress. While mindfulness-based interventions are well-established for stress management, their time-intensive formats may pose barriers for those with long shifts and unpredictable schedules. Smartphone-delivered mindfulness interventions offer a flexible alternative. This study used a micro-randomized controlled trial design to test the effectiveness of two smartphone-delivered mindfulness interventions in reducing momentary stress and stress reactivity to a self-reported stressor. The two interventions included: (1) a text message reminder to engage in a mindfulness practice (brief message) and (2) a prompt to complete an app-based guided mindfulness practice (MYAPT.MIND). Participants were 75 first responders (M = 38.9, SD = 6.8) who completed ecological momentary assessments twice a day (EMA 1 and EMA 2) and received 1 of 3 conditions daily (i.e., no-intervention, brief message, or MYAPT.MIND) between EMA 1 and EMA 2 for 30 days. Multilevel modeling was used to estimate the proximal effects of the daily intervention assignments and to test whether the interventions dampened the impact of stressor exposures on momentary stress at EMA 2. Results indicated no direct effect of interventions on momentary stress. However, participants who were assigned to MYAPT.MIND reported smaller increases in momentary stress following a stressor exposure than for the brief message or control groups. These findings highlight the potential of app-based mindfulness interventions as a \"just-in-time\" tool for acute stress management.</p>","PeriodicalId":48268,"journal":{"name":"Prevention Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prevention Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-026-01957-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

First responders face extreme workplace stressors that can increase symptoms of distress. While mindfulness-based interventions are well-established for stress management, their time-intensive formats may pose barriers for those with long shifts and unpredictable schedules. Smartphone-delivered mindfulness interventions offer a flexible alternative. This study used a micro-randomized controlled trial design to test the effectiveness of two smartphone-delivered mindfulness interventions in reducing momentary stress and stress reactivity to a self-reported stressor. The two interventions included: (1) a text message reminder to engage in a mindfulness practice (brief message) and (2) a prompt to complete an app-based guided mindfulness practice (MYAPT.MIND). Participants were 75 first responders (M = 38.9, SD = 6.8) who completed ecological momentary assessments twice a day (EMA 1 and EMA 2) and received 1 of 3 conditions daily (i.e., no-intervention, brief message, or MYAPT.MIND) between EMA 1 and EMA 2 for 30 days. Multilevel modeling was used to estimate the proximal effects of the daily intervention assignments and to test whether the interventions dampened the impact of stressor exposures on momentary stress at EMA 2. Results indicated no direct effect of interventions on momentary stress. However, participants who were assigned to MYAPT.MIND reported smaller increases in momentary stress following a stressor exposure than for the brief message or control groups. These findings highlight the potential of app-based mindfulness interventions as a "just-in-time" tool for acute stress management.

基于智能手机的正念干预对第一响应者瞬间压力的影响:一项微随机试验。
急救人员面临着极端的工作压力,这些压力会增加痛苦的症状。虽然以正念为基础的干预措施在压力管理方面是行之有效的,但它们耗时的形式可能会对那些长时间轮班和不可预测的时间表构成障碍。智能手机提供的正念干预提供了一个灵活的选择。本研究采用微随机对照试验设计来测试两种智能手机正念干预在减少瞬间压力和对自我报告的压力源的压力反应方面的有效性。这两种干预措施包括:(1)短信提醒参与正念练习(简短信息)和(2)提示完成基于应用程序的引导正念练习(MYAPT.MIND)。参与者是75名第一响应者(M = 38.9, SD = 6.8),他们每天完成两次生态瞬间评估(EMA 1和EMA 2),每天接受3种条件中的1种(即无干预、简短信息或MYAPT)。MIND)在EMA 1和EMA 2之间持续30天。使用多水平模型来估计每日干预分配的近端效应,并测试干预是否抑制应激源暴露对EMA 2瞬时应激的影响。结果表明,干预措施对瞬时应激无直接影响。然而,被分配到MYAPT的参与者。MIND报告说,与短消息组或控制组相比,应激源暴露后瞬间压力的增加幅度较小。这些发现强调了基于应用程序的正念干预作为急性压力管理“及时”工具的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prevention Science
Prevention Science PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
11.40%
发文量
128
期刊介绍: Prevention Science is the official publication of the Society for Prevention Research. The Journal serves as an interdisciplinary forum designed to disseminate new developments in the theory, research and practice of prevention. Prevention sciences encompassing etiology, epidemiology and intervention are represented through peer-reviewed original research articles on a variety of health and social problems, including but not limited to substance abuse, mental health, HIV/AIDS, violence, accidents, teenage pregnancy, suicide, delinquency, STD''s, obesity, diet/nutrition, exercise, and chronic illness. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical articles, meta-analyses, systematic reviews, brief reports, replication studies, and papers concerning new developments in methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书