From the Rainbow to the Sunset: Anticipated Availability of Informal Care for Older Sexual Minorities in the United States.

IF 2.1 3区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY
Population Research and Policy Review Pub Date : 2026-06-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-17 DOI:10.1007/s11113-026-10008-4
Kent Jason Cheng
{"title":"From the Rainbow to the Sunset: Anticipated Availability of Informal Care for Older Sexual Minorities in the United States.","authors":"Kent Jason Cheng","doi":"10.1007/s11113-026-10008-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Anticipatory support-defined as the perceived availability of future care-functions as a psychological safety net that promotes mental well-being and is predictive of actual support received. Yet, little is known about how it varies by sexual identity. Using data of older adults without current ADL limitations from the 2022 wave of the Health and Retirement Study (n = 11,828), I conducted descriptive analyses, modified Poisson regressions, and pairwise comparisons of predicted probabilities of anticipated support by sexual identity. While there is no strong evidence of sexual identity disparities in the overall availability of future ADL support, the sources of such support varied by sexual identity. Among those with at least one child, the probability of lesbian/gay individuals counting on children/grandchildren were about 27 percentage points lower than that of heterosexual individuals. Additionally, the predicted probability of anticipating support from non-kin or someone else outside of a spouse, descendants, or other relatives was about 10 percentage points higher for lesbian/gay older adults compared to their heterosexual counterparts. These findings underscore both the vulnerability and resilience of sexual minority older adults-who may be less able to rely on kin-based care due to strained or absent family ties, yet more likely to turn to chosen family networks for future support. As formal care systems become increasingly strained, future research is needed to understand how chosen families function as caregiving structures and what barriers sexual minorities face in accessing both formal and informal long-term care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47633,"journal":{"name":"Population Research and Policy Review","volume":"45 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13455151/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Research and Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-026-10008-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anticipatory support-defined as the perceived availability of future care-functions as a psychological safety net that promotes mental well-being and is predictive of actual support received. Yet, little is known about how it varies by sexual identity. Using data of older adults without current ADL limitations from the 2022 wave of the Health and Retirement Study (n = 11,828), I conducted descriptive analyses, modified Poisson regressions, and pairwise comparisons of predicted probabilities of anticipated support by sexual identity. While there is no strong evidence of sexual identity disparities in the overall availability of future ADL support, the sources of such support varied by sexual identity. Among those with at least one child, the probability of lesbian/gay individuals counting on children/grandchildren were about 27 percentage points lower than that of heterosexual individuals. Additionally, the predicted probability of anticipating support from non-kin or someone else outside of a spouse, descendants, or other relatives was about 10 percentage points higher for lesbian/gay older adults compared to their heterosexual counterparts. These findings underscore both the vulnerability and resilience of sexual minority older adults-who may be less able to rely on kin-based care due to strained or absent family ties, yet more likely to turn to chosen family networks for future support. As formal care systems become increasingly strained, future research is needed to understand how chosen families function as caregiving structures and what barriers sexual minorities face in accessing both formal and informal long-term care.

从彩虹到日落:美国老年性少数群体非正式护理的预期可用性。
预期支持——定义为对未来护理的可获得性的感知——作为促进心理健康的心理安全网,并可预测所获得的实际支持。然而,人们很少知道它是如何因性别身份而变化的。利用2022年健康与退休研究(n = 11,828)中没有当前ADL限制的老年人的数据,我进行了描述性分析、修正泊松回归,并对性别认同预期支持的预测概率进行了两两比较。虽然没有强有力的证据表明性别认同在未来ADL支持的总体可得性方面存在差异,但这种支持的来源因性别认同而异。在那些至少有一个孩子的人中,女同性恋/男同性恋依赖儿孙的概率比异性恋个体低约27个百分点。此外,与异性恋老年人相比,女同性恋/男同性恋老年人预期来自非亲属或配偶、后代或其他亲属以外的人的支持的预测概率高出约10个百分点。这些发现强调了性少数老年人的脆弱性和韧性——由于家庭关系紧张或缺失,他们可能不太能够依赖以亲属为基础的照顾,但更有可能转向选择的家庭网络寻求未来的支持。随着正规护理系统变得越来越紧张,未来需要进行研究,以了解选定的家庭如何发挥护理结构的作用,以及性少数群体在获得正规和非正规长期护理方面面临哪些障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: Now accepted in JSTOR! Population Research and Policy Review has a twofold goal: it provides a convenient source for government officials and scholars in which they can learn about the policy implications of recent research relevant to the causes and consequences of changing population size and composition; and it provides a broad, interdisciplinary coverage of population research. Population Research and Policy Review seeks to publish quality material of interest to professionals working in the fields of population, and those fields which intersect and overlap with population studies. The publication includes demographic, economic, social, political and health research papers and related contributions which are based on either the direct scientific evaluation of particular policies or programs, or general contributions intended to advance knowledge that informs policy and program development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书