Susan M Abdel-Rahman, Debbie A Avant, Gilbert J Burckart
{"title":"Suitability of Oral Formulations Available to Children at the Time of Pediatric Labeling.","authors":"Susan M Abdel-Rahman, Debbie A Avant, Gilbert J Burckart","doi":"10.5863/JPPT-25-00141","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The pediatric drug development landscape has experienced major shifts, largely in response to legislative and regulatory initiatives. However, associated laws and guidance documents fail to mandate the manufacture of pediatric formulations for commercial marketing post-regulatory approval. This study explores the nature of commercial products available at the time of pediatric labeling.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All orally administered drugs for which labeling changes were made from 1998-2024 were evaluated. Characteristics of each drug's commercially marketed formulation(s) at the time of labeling were identified using product labeling (Drugs@FDA), Drugs.com, and DailyMed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the timeframe reviewed, there were 611 unique labeling changes representing 425 unique drugs available as 567 commercially marketed formulations. Of these drugs, 188 were marketed with pediatric-friendly (PF) formulations. The remainder were available only as solid oral dosage forms. For 329 pediatric labeling changes (53.8%), the only commercially marketed formulation was a solid oral dosage form, in many cases at sizes exceeding reasonable thresholds for the age group. For the remaining 282 labeling changes, a PF formulation was available alone or as a companion to the adult formulation. Among the PF formulations, 62% were suited to direct administration (liquid, orodispersible tablet, chewable/paste, transmucosal) while the remainder required manipulation (i.e. powder/granule, sprinkle/pellet, dispersible tablet). Three-fourths of the PF formulations incorporated flavorings and aromas though 13% failed to report the use of sweeteners.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Less than complete access to PF formulations requires attention if we are to maximize the provision of suitable pharmacotherapy for pediatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":37484,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","volume":"31 4","pages":"493-500"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13456166/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5863/JPPT-25-00141","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The pediatric drug development landscape has experienced major shifts, largely in response to legislative and regulatory initiatives. However, associated laws and guidance documents fail to mandate the manufacture of pediatric formulations for commercial marketing post-regulatory approval. This study explores the nature of commercial products available at the time of pediatric labeling.
Methods: All orally administered drugs for which labeling changes were made from 1998-2024 were evaluated. Characteristics of each drug's commercially marketed formulation(s) at the time of labeling were identified using product labeling (Drugs@FDA), Drugs.com, and DailyMed.
Results: During the timeframe reviewed, there were 611 unique labeling changes representing 425 unique drugs available as 567 commercially marketed formulations. Of these drugs, 188 were marketed with pediatric-friendly (PF) formulations. The remainder were available only as solid oral dosage forms. For 329 pediatric labeling changes (53.8%), the only commercially marketed formulation was a solid oral dosage form, in many cases at sizes exceeding reasonable thresholds for the age group. For the remaining 282 labeling changes, a PF formulation was available alone or as a companion to the adult formulation. Among the PF formulations, 62% were suited to direct administration (liquid, orodispersible tablet, chewable/paste, transmucosal) while the remainder required manipulation (i.e. powder/granule, sprinkle/pellet, dispersible tablet). Three-fourths of the PF formulations incorporated flavorings and aromas though 13% failed to report the use of sweeteners.
Conclusions: Less than complete access to PF formulations requires attention if we are to maximize the provision of suitable pharmacotherapy for pediatric patients.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pediatric Pharmacology and Therapeutics is the official journal of the Pediatric Pharmacy Advocacy Group. JPPT is a peer-reviewed multi disciplinary journal that is devoted to promoting the safe and effective use of medications in infants and children. To this end, the journal publishes practical information for all practitioners who provide care to pediatric patients. Each issue includes review articles, original clinical investigations, case reports, editorials, and other information relevant to pediatric medication therapy. The Journal focuses all work on issues related to the practice of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics. The scope of content includes pharmacotherapy, extemporaneous compounding, dosing, methods of medication administration, medication error prevention, and legislative issues. The Journal will contain original research, review articles, short subjects, case reports, clinical investigations, editorials, and news from such organizations as the Pediatric Pharmacy Advocacy Group, the FDA, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists, and so on.