{"title":"Enterprise ownership, workplace culture, and smoking cessation difficulty in China: A cross-sectional data analysis.","authors":"Gang Wang, Kecheng Du","doi":"10.18332/tid/226285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Workplaces are important settings for smoke-free protection and cessation support, but enterprise ownership may shape quit attempts. This cross-sectional data analysis examined whether employees of state-owned enterprises experience greater smoking cessation difficulty than employees of private enterprises.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed cross-sectional self-reported data from an anonymous online questionnaire administered in October 2025. The questionnaire link was distributed through employee WeChat groups in six enterprises in Zhejiang Province, China (three state-owned and three private). Eligible participants were full-time employees aged ≥18 years who had worked in the enterprise for at least six months. The analytic sample comprised 989 employees. Outcomes were workplace cessation culture, indoor workplace secondhand smoke exposure in the past 30 days, quit intention within six months, and past-year quit attempt among current smokers. Ownership-group differences were assessed descriptively and using multivariable linear regression and logistic generalized estimating equations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 483 state-owned and 506 private enterprise employees. Current smoking was more common in state-owned enterprises (34.8% vs 27.5%, p=0.046). State-owned enterprise employees reported lower cessation culture (3.33 vs 3.64, p<0.001), less cessation support (2.5 vs 3.6, p<0.001), stronger pro-smoking norms (2.90 vs 2.49, p<0.001), and more indoor workplace secondhand smoke exposure (42.0% vs 25.5%, p<0.001). Among current smokers, quit intention (36.9% vs 52.5%, p=0.009) and past-year quit attempts (29.8% vs 57.6%, p<0.001) were less common in state-owned enterprises. After adjustment, private enterprise employment was associated with higher odds of quit intention (adjusted odds ratio, AOR=1.51; 95% CI: 1.05-2.19) and past-year quit attempt (AOR=2.82; 95% CI: 1.65-4.84).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>State-owned enterprise employees experienced greater cessation difficulty than private enterprise employees. Higher secondhand smoke exposure, stronger pro-smoking norms, weaker cessation support, and lower leadership commitment may contribute to this ownership-related difference.</p>","PeriodicalId":23202,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","volume":"24 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13455870/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Induced Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/226285","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Workplaces are important settings for smoke-free protection and cessation support, but enterprise ownership may shape quit attempts. This cross-sectional data analysis examined whether employees of state-owned enterprises experience greater smoking cessation difficulty than employees of private enterprises.
Methods: We analyzed cross-sectional self-reported data from an anonymous online questionnaire administered in October 2025. The questionnaire link was distributed through employee WeChat groups in six enterprises in Zhejiang Province, China (three state-owned and three private). Eligible participants were full-time employees aged ≥18 years who had worked in the enterprise for at least six months. The analytic sample comprised 989 employees. Outcomes were workplace cessation culture, indoor workplace secondhand smoke exposure in the past 30 days, quit intention within six months, and past-year quit attempt among current smokers. Ownership-group differences were assessed descriptively and using multivariable linear regression and logistic generalized estimating equations.
Results: The sample included 483 state-owned and 506 private enterprise employees. Current smoking was more common in state-owned enterprises (34.8% vs 27.5%, p=0.046). State-owned enterprise employees reported lower cessation culture (3.33 vs 3.64, p<0.001), less cessation support (2.5 vs 3.6, p<0.001), stronger pro-smoking norms (2.90 vs 2.49, p<0.001), and more indoor workplace secondhand smoke exposure (42.0% vs 25.5%, p<0.001). Among current smokers, quit intention (36.9% vs 52.5%, p=0.009) and past-year quit attempts (29.8% vs 57.6%, p<0.001) were less common in state-owned enterprises. After adjustment, private enterprise employment was associated with higher odds of quit intention (adjusted odds ratio, AOR=1.51; 95% CI: 1.05-2.19) and past-year quit attempt (AOR=2.82; 95% CI: 1.65-4.84).
Conclusions: State-owned enterprise employees experienced greater cessation difficulty than private enterprise employees. Higher secondhand smoke exposure, stronger pro-smoking norms, weaker cessation support, and lower leadership commitment may contribute to this ownership-related difference.
工作场所是提供无烟保护和戒烟支持的重要场所,但企业所有权可能会影响戒烟尝试。本横截面数据分析检验了国有企业员工是否比民营企业员工有更大的戒烟困难。方法:我们分析了一份于2025年10月进行的匿名在线问卷的横断面自我报告数据。问卷链接通过中国浙江省6家企业(3家国有企业和3家民营企业)的员工微信组进行分发。符合条件的参与者是年满18岁且在企业工作至少6个月的全职员工。分析样本包括989名员工。结果包括工作场所戒烟文化、过去30天室内工作场所二手烟暴露情况、6个月内戒烟意向以及当前吸烟者过去一年的戒烟尝试。使用多变量线性回归和logistic广义估计方程对所有权组差异进行描述性评估。结果:样本包括国有企业职工483人,民营企业职工506人。目前吸烟在国有企业中更为普遍(34.8% vs 27.5%, p=0.046)。国有企业员工的戒烟文化较低(3.33 vs 3.64)。结论:国有企业员工的戒烟难度大于私营企业员工。较高的二手烟暴露、较强的吸烟规范、较弱的戒烟支持和较低的领导承诺可能导致这种与所有权相关的差异。
期刊介绍:
Tobacco Induced Diseases encompasses all aspects of research related to the prevention and control of tobacco use at a global level. Preventing diseases attributable to tobacco is only one aspect of the journal, whose overall scope is to provide a forum for the publication of research articles that can contribute to reducing the burden of tobacco induced diseases globally. To address this epidemic we believe that there must be an avenue for the publication of research/policy activities on tobacco control initiatives that may be very important at a regional and national level. This approach provides a very important "hands on" service to the tobacco control community at a global scale - as common problems have common solutions. Hence, we see ourselves as "connectors" within this global community.
The journal hence encourages the submission of articles from all medical, biological and psychosocial disciplines, ranging from medical and dental clinicians, through health professionals to basic biomedical and clinical scientists.