A Mixed-Methods Assessment of Minnesota Public Health Corps and Member Career Capital.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Chelsey Kirkland, Anthony Coetzer-Liversage, Noah Yee Westfall, Henry Stabler, Jonathon P Leider
{"title":"A Mixed-Methods Assessment of Minnesota Public Health Corps and Member Career Capital.","authors":"Chelsey Kirkland, Anthony Coetzer-Liversage, Noah Yee Westfall, Henry Stabler, Jonathon P Leider","doi":"10.1097/PHH.0000000000002372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Persistent workforce shortages have challenged the public health workforce. During COVID-19 response, the federal government launched Public Health AmeriCorps (PHA) to embed AmeriCorps members in public health systems. Minnesota Public Health Corps (MNPHC), a PHA initiative, focused on placing members in Minnesota public health agencies to strengthen capacity.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study was to strengthen the evidence base for public health workforce development by evaluating the relationship between MNPHC participation on members' \"career capital,\" and subdomains of \"Knowing How,\" \"Knowing Why,\" and \"Knowing Whom,\" through a mixed-methods approach, addressing a key gap in program evaluation and guiding future strategies.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-group, pre-post observational, explanatory mixed-methods design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Public health agencies with at least one MNPHC member.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>MNPHC members.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Career capital.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants demonstrated significant gains in overall career capital (scale of 1-7) after service, with mean scores increasing from 5.4 preservice to 6.1 postservice ( P < .001). In the \"Knowing How\" domain (scale of 1-7), scores rose from a preservice mean of 5.4-6.1 postservice ( P < .001), supported by 2237 qualitative references from 94 members. The \"Knowing Why\" domain (scale of 1-7) showed an increase from 5.6 to 6.1 ( P < .001), with 315 qualitative references from 74 members. In the \"Knowing Whom\" domain (scale of 1-7), scores improved from 5.2 to 5.9 ( P < .001), with 171 qualitative references from 65 members.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Quantitative results showed a difference in members' career capital from preservice to postservice; the qualitative data support and contextualize the quantitative findings. An integrated interpretation supports an inference that participants' career development was both statistically and experientially significant, with applied skill-building acting as a potential driver of broader gains.</p>","PeriodicalId":47855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"919-928"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000002372","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Persistent workforce shortages have challenged the public health workforce. During COVID-19 response, the federal government launched Public Health AmeriCorps (PHA) to embed AmeriCorps members in public health systems. Minnesota Public Health Corps (MNPHC), a PHA initiative, focused on placing members in Minnesota public health agencies to strengthen capacity.

Objective: The objective of this study was to strengthen the evidence base for public health workforce development by evaluating the relationship between MNPHC participation on members' "career capital," and subdomains of "Knowing How," "Knowing Why," and "Knowing Whom," through a mixed-methods approach, addressing a key gap in program evaluation and guiding future strategies.

Design: Single-group, pre-post observational, explanatory mixed-methods design.

Setting: Public health agencies with at least one MNPHC member.

Participants: MNPHC members.

Main outcome measures: Career capital.

Results: Participants demonstrated significant gains in overall career capital (scale of 1-7) after service, with mean scores increasing from 5.4 preservice to 6.1 postservice ( P < .001). In the "Knowing How" domain (scale of 1-7), scores rose from a preservice mean of 5.4-6.1 postservice ( P < .001), supported by 2237 qualitative references from 94 members. The "Knowing Why" domain (scale of 1-7) showed an increase from 5.6 to 6.1 ( P < .001), with 315 qualitative references from 74 members. In the "Knowing Whom" domain (scale of 1-7), scores improved from 5.2 to 5.9 ( P < .001), with 171 qualitative references from 65 members.

Conclusions: Quantitative results showed a difference in members' career capital from preservice to postservice; the qualitative data support and contextualize the quantitative findings. An integrated interpretation supports an inference that participants' career development was both statistically and experientially significant, with applied skill-building acting as a potential driver of broader gains.

明尼苏达州公共卫生队和成员职业资本的混合方法评估。
背景:持续的人力短缺对公共卫生人力构成挑战。在应对COVID-19期间,联邦政府启动了公共卫生美国队(Public Health AmeriCorps, PHA),将美国队成员纳入公共卫生系统。明尼苏达州公共卫生队(MNPHC)是一项PHA倡议,其重点是将成员安置在明尼苏达州公共卫生机构,以加强能力。目的:本研究的目的是通过混合方法评估MNPHC参与成员“职业资本”与“知道如何”、“知道为什么”和“知道谁”子领域之间的关系,从而加强公共卫生人力发展的证据基础,解决项目评估中的关键差距并指导未来战略。设计:单组、前后观察、解释性混合方法设计。环境:至少有一名MNPHC成员的公共卫生机构。参加者:全国妇联会员。主要衡量指标:职业资本。结果:参与者在服务后表现出显著的整体职业资本(量表1-7),平均得分从服务前的5.4分增加到服务后的6.1分(P < .001)。在“知道如何”领域(1-7的量表),得分从服务前的平均5.4-6.1上升到服务后(P < .001),得到来自94名成员的2237个定性参考文献的支持。“知道为什么”领域(量表1-7)从5.6增加到6.1 (P < 0.001), 74个成员的315个定性参考。在“认识谁”领域(1-7分),得分从5.2提高到5.9 (P < 0.001),来自65名成员的171个定性参考。结论:量化结果显示,成员职前与职后职业资本存在差异;定性数据支持定量结果并将其置于背景中。综合解释支持这样一个推论,即参与者的职业发展在统计上和经验上都是显著的,应用技能建设是更广泛收益的潜在驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
287
期刊介绍: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes articles which focus on evidence based public health practice and research. The journal is a bi-monthly peer-reviewed publication guided by a multidisciplinary editorial board of administrators, practitioners and scientists. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice publishes in a wide range of population health topics including research to practice; emergency preparedness; bioterrorism; infectious disease surveillance; environmental health; community health assessment, chronic disease prevention and health promotion, and academic-practice linkages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书