Reimagining grand rounds for general practice: developing and delivering a student-co-produced primary care seminar series.

IF 1.2 Q3 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Roaa Al-Bedaery, Katie Scott, Rachel Hulme, Rida Khan, Judith Ibison
{"title":"Reimagining grand rounds for general practice: developing and delivering a student-co-produced primary care seminar series.","authors":"Roaa Al-Bedaery, Katie Scott, Rachel Hulme, Rida Khan, Judith Ibison","doi":"10.1080/14739879.2026.2690641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>What was the educational challenge?: </strong>Primary care remains under-represented in undergraduate curricula, and academic general practice has limited visibility. Traditional educational forums such as 'Grand Rounds' rarely focus on general practice, reducing opportunities for students to explore the breadth, intellectual challenge, and diversity of contemporary GP careers.</p><p><strong>What was the educational solution?: </strong>We developed an online primary care seminar series explicitly modelled on the 'Grand Round' format, but updated for a temporally and geographically flexible, learner-centred audience. Crucially, the series was co-produced with students and featured GPs and academic GPs presenting narrative-based accounts of innovative and evolving areas of primary care. Sessions were delivered live and made available asynchronously.</p><p><strong>What lessons were learned?: </strong>Survey and focus group feedback indicated that participants valued exposure to unfamiliar aspects of primary care, speakers' personal career narratives, and insight into portfolio and academic careers. The online format supported accessibility and broad participation, although some participants expressed a desire for greater interactivity.</p><p><strong>What are the next steps?: </strong>Future iterations will refine opportunities for interaction, broaden topic coverage, and continue evaluation. Longer-term impacts on career decisions were not measured and represent a gap for future work.</p>","PeriodicalId":46436,"journal":{"name":"Education for Primary Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education for Primary Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2026.2690641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

What was the educational challenge?: Primary care remains under-represented in undergraduate curricula, and academic general practice has limited visibility. Traditional educational forums such as 'Grand Rounds' rarely focus on general practice, reducing opportunities for students to explore the breadth, intellectual challenge, and diversity of contemporary GP careers.

What was the educational solution?: We developed an online primary care seminar series explicitly modelled on the 'Grand Round' format, but updated for a temporally and geographically flexible, learner-centred audience. Crucially, the series was co-produced with students and featured GPs and academic GPs presenting narrative-based accounts of innovative and evolving areas of primary care. Sessions were delivered live and made available asynchronously.

What lessons were learned?: Survey and focus group feedback indicated that participants valued exposure to unfamiliar aspects of primary care, speakers' personal career narratives, and insight into portfolio and academic careers. The online format supported accessibility and broad participation, although some participants expressed a desire for greater interactivity.

What are the next steps?: Future iterations will refine opportunities for interaction, broaden topic coverage, and continue evaluation. Longer-term impacts on career decisions were not measured and represent a gap for future work.

重新构想全科实践的大会诊:开发和提供学生共同制作的初级保健系列研讨会。
教育方面的挑战是什么?初级保健在本科课程中的代表性仍然不足,学术全科实践的可见度有限。传统的教育论坛,如“Grand Rounds”,很少关注全科实践,减少了学生探索当代全科医生职业的广度、智力挑战和多样性的机会。教育方面的解决方案是什么?我们开发了一个在线初级保健研讨会系列,明确模仿了“大圆桌会议”的形式,但针对时间和地理上灵活的、以学习者为中心的受众进行了更新。至关重要的是,该系列是与学生、全科医生和学术全科医生共同制作的,以叙事为基础,介绍了创新和不断发展的初级保健领域。会话是实时交付的,并且是异步可用的。从中吸取了什么教训?调查和焦点小组反馈表明,参与者重视初级保健不熟悉的方面,演讲者的个人职业叙述,以及对投资组合和学术生涯的见解。在线形式支持可访问性和广泛参与,尽管一些与会者表示希望加强互动性。下一步是什么?未来的迭代将细化交互的机会,扩大主题覆盖范围,并继续进行评估。对职业决策的长期影响没有被衡量,并且代表了未来工作的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Education for Primary Care
Education for Primary Care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Education for Primary Care aims to reflect the best experience, expertise and innovative ideas in the development of undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing primary care education. The journal is UK based but welcomes contributions from all over the world. Readers will benefit from the broader perspectives on educational activities provided through the contributions of all health professionals, including general practitioners, nurses, midwives, health visitors, community nurses and managers. This sharing of experiences has the potential for enhancing healthcare delivery and for promoting interprofessional working.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书