Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Single-Session Interventions Reduce Procrastination among Students Compared to a Control Group: The CONCRAS Study.
{"title":"Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Single-Session Interventions Reduce Procrastination among Students Compared to a Control Group: The CONCRAS Study.","authors":"Daria Mousavi, Winfried Rief, Marcel Wilhelm","doi":"10.1159/pps/aemag001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Procrastination is highly prevalent among university students and associated with substantial impairments in well-being and functioning. This randomized controlled trial examined the efficacy of two single-session interventions (SSIs) - one based on cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and one on acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) - for reducing procrastination and tested the role of outcome expectations and experimentally induced expectation (in)congruence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 151 students with recurrent procrastination and a currently postponed task were randomly assigned to a CBT SSI, ACT SSI, or a no-intervention control group. Interventions (approximately 60 min) were delivered face-to-face and preceded by a videotaped ACT- or CBT-based treatment rationale to manipulate expectation congruence. Assessments took place at baseline, post-intervention, and 2-week follow-up. The primary outcome was state procrastination (APSI-d); secondary outcomes included APSI-d Anxiety and Doubt and Task Aversion, depressive symptoms (PHQ-9), psychological flexibility (CompACT-8), perceived improvement, and improvement expectations (G-EEE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Linear mixed models showed a substantial time × condition interaction for state procrastination, with both SSIs yielding significantly greater reductions than the control group and no significant difference between CBT and ACT. Similar patterns emerged for task-related anxiety and doubt, depressive symptoms, psychological flexibility (small-to-moderate gains), and perceived improvement. Higher baseline improvement expectations were associated with greater improvement, whereas expectation congruence and experimentally induced expectation violation did not differentially affect expectations or outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest that CBT- and ACT-based SSIs are effective, low-threshold options for reducing procrastination in students in the short term and highlight adherence and treatment expectations as important levers for optimizing brief interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/pps/aemag001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Procrastination is highly prevalent among university students and associated with substantial impairments in well-being and functioning. This randomized controlled trial examined the efficacy of two single-session interventions (SSIs) - one based on cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and one on acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) - for reducing procrastination and tested the role of outcome expectations and experimentally induced expectation (in)congruence.
Methods: A total of 151 students with recurrent procrastination and a currently postponed task were randomly assigned to a CBT SSI, ACT SSI, or a no-intervention control group. Interventions (approximately 60 min) were delivered face-to-face and preceded by a videotaped ACT- or CBT-based treatment rationale to manipulate expectation congruence. Assessments took place at baseline, post-intervention, and 2-week follow-up. The primary outcome was state procrastination (APSI-d); secondary outcomes included APSI-d Anxiety and Doubt and Task Aversion, depressive symptoms (PHQ-9), psychological flexibility (CompACT-8), perceived improvement, and improvement expectations (G-EEE).
Results: Linear mixed models showed a substantial time × condition interaction for state procrastination, with both SSIs yielding significantly greater reductions than the control group and no significant difference between CBT and ACT. Similar patterns emerged for task-related anxiety and doubt, depressive symptoms, psychological flexibility (small-to-moderate gains), and perceived improvement. Higher baseline improvement expectations were associated with greater improvement, whereas expectation congruence and experimentally induced expectation violation did not differentially affect expectations or outcomes.
Conclusion: Findings suggest that CBT- and ACT-based SSIs are effective, low-threshold options for reducing procrastination in students in the short term and highlight adherence and treatment expectations as important levers for optimizing brief interventions.
期刊介绍:
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics is a reputable journal that has been published since 1953. Over the years, it has gained recognition for its independence, originality, and methodological rigor. The journal has been at the forefront of research in psychosomatic medicine, psychotherapy research, and psychopharmacology, and has contributed to the development of new lines of research in these areas. It is now ranked among the world's most cited journals in the field.
As the official journal of the International College of Psychosomatic Medicine and the World Federation for Psychotherapy, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics serves as a platform for discussing current and controversial issues and showcasing innovations in assessment and treatment. It offers a unique forum for cutting-edge thinking at the intersection of medical and behavioral sciences, catering to both practicing clinicians and researchers.
The journal is indexed in various databases and platforms such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Previews, Google Scholar, Academic Search, and Health Research Premium Collection, among others.