Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Single-Session Interventions Reduce Procrastination among Students Compared to a Control Group: The CONCRAS Study.

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Daria Mousavi, Winfried Rief, Marcel Wilhelm
{"title":"Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy Single-Session Interventions Reduce Procrastination among Students Compared to a Control Group: The CONCRAS Study.","authors":"Daria Mousavi, Winfried Rief, Marcel Wilhelm","doi":"10.1159/pps/aemag001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Procrastination is highly prevalent among university students and associated with substantial impairments in well-being and functioning. This randomized controlled trial examined the efficacy of two single-session interventions (SSIs) - one based on cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and one on acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) - for reducing procrastination and tested the role of outcome expectations and experimentally induced expectation (in)congruence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 151 students with recurrent procrastination and a currently postponed task were randomly assigned to a CBT SSI, ACT SSI, or a no-intervention control group. Interventions (approximately 60 min) were delivered face-to-face and preceded by a videotaped ACT- or CBT-based treatment rationale to manipulate expectation congruence. Assessments took place at baseline, post-intervention, and 2-week follow-up. The primary outcome was state procrastination (APSI-d); secondary outcomes included APSI-d Anxiety and Doubt and Task Aversion, depressive symptoms (PHQ-9), psychological flexibility (CompACT-8), perceived improvement, and improvement expectations (G-EEE).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Linear mixed models showed a substantial time × condition interaction for state procrastination, with both SSIs yielding significantly greater reductions than the control group and no significant difference between CBT and ACT. Similar patterns emerged for task-related anxiety and doubt, depressive symptoms, psychological flexibility (small-to-moderate gains), and perceived improvement. Higher baseline improvement expectations were associated with greater improvement, whereas expectation congruence and experimentally induced expectation violation did not differentially affect expectations or outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings suggest that CBT- and ACT-based SSIs are effective, low-threshold options for reducing procrastination in students in the short term and highlight adherence and treatment expectations as important levers for optimizing brief interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20744,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/pps/aemag001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Procrastination is highly prevalent among university students and associated with substantial impairments in well-being and functioning. This randomized controlled trial examined the efficacy of two single-session interventions (SSIs) - one based on cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and one on acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) - for reducing procrastination and tested the role of outcome expectations and experimentally induced expectation (in)congruence.

Methods: A total of 151 students with recurrent procrastination and a currently postponed task were randomly assigned to a CBT SSI, ACT SSI, or a no-intervention control group. Interventions (approximately 60 min) were delivered face-to-face and preceded by a videotaped ACT- or CBT-based treatment rationale to manipulate expectation congruence. Assessments took place at baseline, post-intervention, and 2-week follow-up. The primary outcome was state procrastination (APSI-d); secondary outcomes included APSI-d Anxiety and Doubt and Task Aversion, depressive symptoms (PHQ-9), psychological flexibility (CompACT-8), perceived improvement, and improvement expectations (G-EEE).

Results: Linear mixed models showed a substantial time × condition interaction for state procrastination, with both SSIs yielding significantly greater reductions than the control group and no significant difference between CBT and ACT. Similar patterns emerged for task-related anxiety and doubt, depressive symptoms, psychological flexibility (small-to-moderate gains), and perceived improvement. Higher baseline improvement expectations were associated with greater improvement, whereas expectation congruence and experimentally induced expectation violation did not differentially affect expectations or outcomes.

Conclusion: Findings suggest that CBT- and ACT-based SSIs are effective, low-threshold options for reducing procrastination in students in the short term and highlight adherence and treatment expectations as important levers for optimizing brief interventions.

与对照组相比,ACT和CBT单次干预减少了学生的拖延症——CONCRAS研究。
拖延症在大学生中非常普遍,并与健康和功能的严重损害有关。本随机对照试验检验了两种单疗程干预(ssi)——一种基于认知行为疗法(CBT),另一种基于接受与承诺疗法(ACT)——在减少拖延症方面的效果,并测试了结果预期和实验诱导预期在一致性方面的作用。共有151名患有复发性拖延症和当前延迟任务的学生被随机分配到CBT-SSI组、ACT-SSI组或无干预对照组。干预(大约60分钟)是面对面的,在此之前有一段基于ACT或cbt的治疗基本原理的录像,以操纵期望一致性。评估在基线、干预后和2周随访时进行。主要结局为状态拖延(APSI-d);次要结局包括APSI-d焦虑、怀疑和任务厌恶、抑郁症状(PHQ-9)、心理灵活性(CompACT-8)、感知改善和改善期望(G-EEE)。线性混合模型显示了状态拖延的大量时间x条件相互作用,两种ssi的减少明显大于对照组,CBT和ACT之间无显著差异。类似的模式出现在与任务相关的焦虑和疑虑、抑郁症状、心理灵活性(小到中等的收益)和感知改善上。更高的基线改善期望与更大的改善有关,而期望一致性和实验诱导的期望违反对期望或结果没有差异影响。研究结果表明,基于CBT和act的ssi是短期内减少学生拖延症的有效、低阈值选择,并强调依从性和治疗期望是优化简短干预措施的重要杠杆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
29.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics is a reputable journal that has been published since 1953. Over the years, it has gained recognition for its independence, originality, and methodological rigor. The journal has been at the forefront of research in psychosomatic medicine, psychotherapy research, and psychopharmacology, and has contributed to the development of new lines of research in these areas. It is now ranked among the world's most cited journals in the field. As the official journal of the International College of Psychosomatic Medicine and the World Federation for Psychotherapy, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics serves as a platform for discussing current and controversial issues and showcasing innovations in assessment and treatment. It offers a unique forum for cutting-edge thinking at the intersection of medical and behavioral sciences, catering to both practicing clinicians and researchers. The journal is indexed in various databases and platforms such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Citation Index, Social Sciences Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded, BIOSIS Previews, Google Scholar, Academic Search, and Health Research Premium Collection, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书