Integrated Evidence Generation Planning: Why Medical Affairs is a Critical Partner.

IF 4.7 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Pharmaceutical Medicine Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-10 DOI:10.1007/s40290-026-00620-2
Ronaldo Fujii, Masoud Nouri, Mohammad Khan, Lucija Fleisinger, Jamie Pugh, Gary Male, Antonia Panayi
{"title":"Integrated Evidence Generation Planning: Why Medical Affairs is a Critical Partner.","authors":"Ronaldo Fujii, Masoud Nouri, Mohammad Khan, Lucija Fleisinger, Jamie Pugh, Gary Male, Antonia Panayi","doi":"10.1007/s40290-026-00620-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In an era of rapidly evolving healthcare systems and escalating demands for value demonstration, pharmaceutical companies face unprecedented pressure to generate robust, relevant evidence for a diverse array of stakeholders. Traditional, siloed approaches to evidence generation are no longer sufficient. The development and use of integrated evidence generation plans (IEGPs) have emerged as strategic imperatives-reshaping how organisations align scientific, regulatory and patient-centred objectives across the product life cycle. The IEGPs bring together evidence-generation activities across functions and geographies, to ensure that robust evidence is delivered throughout the product life cycle. In this article, we present IEGP development as a collaborative and strategic process, which enables pharmaceutical companies to demonstrate the holistic value of a new therapy to a broader range of healthcare decision makers. We argue that Medical Affairs professionals are well positioned to lead this initiative, given their in-depth understanding of the evidence generation needs and priorities of patients and healthcare professionals; however, a close and strategic partnership with other key functions, including Market Access and Clinical Development, regions and countries, is vital to the holistic understanding of all key evidence needs and to establish the strategic differentiation required to bring new medicines to patients. Our companion article in this edition of Pharmaceutical Medicine expands on the role of specific subfunctions of Medical Affairs in the development of an IEGP; it also considers how the impact of Medical Affairs' role can be measured. Please note that in both articles we prefer to use the term 'IEGP', but the reader may also see the similar term 'IEP' (Integrated Evidence Plan) used in the literature-these terms are used interchangeably in the field.</p>","PeriodicalId":19778,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceutical Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"351-356"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13545106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceutical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40290-026-00620-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In an era of rapidly evolving healthcare systems and escalating demands for value demonstration, pharmaceutical companies face unprecedented pressure to generate robust, relevant evidence for a diverse array of stakeholders. Traditional, siloed approaches to evidence generation are no longer sufficient. The development and use of integrated evidence generation plans (IEGPs) have emerged as strategic imperatives-reshaping how organisations align scientific, regulatory and patient-centred objectives across the product life cycle. The IEGPs bring together evidence-generation activities across functions and geographies, to ensure that robust evidence is delivered throughout the product life cycle. In this article, we present IEGP development as a collaborative and strategic process, which enables pharmaceutical companies to demonstrate the holistic value of a new therapy to a broader range of healthcare decision makers. We argue that Medical Affairs professionals are well positioned to lead this initiative, given their in-depth understanding of the evidence generation needs and priorities of patients and healthcare professionals; however, a close and strategic partnership with other key functions, including Market Access and Clinical Development, regions and countries, is vital to the holistic understanding of all key evidence needs and to establish the strategic differentiation required to bring new medicines to patients. Our companion article in this edition of Pharmaceutical Medicine expands on the role of specific subfunctions of Medical Affairs in the development of an IEGP; it also considers how the impact of Medical Affairs' role can be measured. Please note that in both articles we prefer to use the term 'IEGP', but the reader may also see the similar term 'IEP' (Integrated Evidence Plan) used in the literature-these terms are used interchangeably in the field.

综合证据生成计划:为什么医疗事务是一个关键的合作伙伴。
在医疗保健系统快速发展和价值论证需求不断升级的时代,制药公司面临着前所未有的压力,需要为各种利益相关者提供强有力的相关证据。传统的、孤立的证据生成方法已不再足够。综合证据生成计划(IEGPs)的开发和使用已经成为战略要务——重塑组织如何在整个产品生命周期中协调科学、监管和以患者为中心的目标。iieg汇集了跨职能和地域的证据生成活动,以确保在整个产品生命周期内提供有力的证据。在本文中,我们将IEGP开发作为一个协作和战略过程,它使制药公司能够向更广泛的医疗保健决策者展示新疗法的整体价值。我们认为,医疗事务专业人员有能力领导这一举措,因为他们对患者和医疗保健专业人员的证据生成需求和优先事项有深入的了解;然而,与其他关键职能部门(包括市场准入和临床开发)、区域和国家建立密切的战略伙伴关系,对于全面了解所有关键证据需求和建立将新药带给患者所需的战略差异化至关重要。我们在本期《药物医学》中的配套文章扩展了医疗事务在IEGP发展中的特定子功能的作用;它还考虑了如何衡量医务角色的影响。请注意,在这两篇文章中,我们更喜欢使用术语“IEP”,但读者也可能看到文献中使用的类似术语“IEP”(综合证据计划),这些术语在该领域可以互换使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmaceutical Medicine
Pharmaceutical Medicine PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Pharmaceutical Medicine is a specialist discipline concerned with medical aspects of the discovery, development, evaluation, registration, regulation, monitoring, marketing, distribution and pricing of medicines, drug-device and drug-diagnostic combinations. The Journal disseminates information to support the community of professionals working in these highly inter-related functions. Key areas include translational medicine, clinical trial design, pharmacovigilance, clinical toxicology, drug regulation, clinical pharmacology, biostatistics and pharmacoeconomics. The Journal includes:Overviews of contentious or emerging issues.Comprehensive narrative reviews that provide an authoritative source of information on topical issues.Systematic reviews that collate empirical evidence to answer a specific research question, using explicit, systematic methods as outlined by PRISMA statement.Original research articles reporting the results of well-designed studies with a strong link to wider areas of clinical research.Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Pharmaceutical Medicine may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts. Letters to the Editor are welcomed and will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书