[Reflections on surgical management strategies for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant immunotherapy].

Q3 Medicine
Yijie Xi, Yuxuan Li, Lifan Lin, Lu Chen, Xin Yuan, Liying Zhao, Hao Liu, Tian Lin, Mingli Zhao, Wu Zhong, Yanfeng Hu, Weihong Guo
{"title":"[Reflections on surgical management strategies for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant immunotherapy].","authors":"Yijie Xi, Yuxuan Li, Lifan Lin, Lu Chen, Xin Yuan, Liying Zhao, Hao Liu, Tian Lin, Mingli Zhao, Wu Zhong, Yanfeng Hu, Weihong Guo","doi":"10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2026.08.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neoadjuvant immunotherapy is reshaping the treatment landscape of locally advanced gastric cancer (GC). The central clinical challenge has expanded from whether immunotherapy can enhance treatment efficacy to accurate identification of patients who are most likely to benefit and optimization of the subsequent surgical intervention. Accumulating evidence indicates that perioperative immunotherapy-based regimens can improve pathological complete response (pCR) rates and event-free survival (EFS) of the patients, promoting a shift from conventional chemotherapy plus radical surgery toward biomarker-guided, integrated precision treatment. For therapeutic stratification, microsatellite instability (MSI) status, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, and refined human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) classification have emerged as key indicators for predicting treatment response and selecting eligible patients. Meanwhile, treatment response assessment has evolved beyond conventional radiological evaluation to a multimodal framework incorporating pathological assessment, liquid biopsy, endoscopy, functional imaging, and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted analysis, thereby providing more comprehensive support for individualized therapeutic decision-making. However, improved treatment efficacy has also raised new questions for surgical management. In particular, discordant responses between primary tumors and regional lymph nodes have challenged whether D2 radical gastrectomy planned according to pretreatment clinical staging remains the optimal surgical strategy. This review systematically summarizes the evolution of neoadjuvant treatment strategies for locally advanced GC, comprehensive response assessment, and redefinition of gastrectomy extent and lymphadenectomy strategy. Looking forward, with the clinical translation of emerging therapeutic targets such as Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) and fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2), together with the maturation of AI-driven multimodal assessment systems, GC surgery may move beyond traditional anatomical boundaries. This transition potentially enables \"maximally tolerated radical resection\" to \"function-preserving surgery guided by biological radicality\", ultimately providing truly individualized precision surgical treatment for patients with locally advanced GC.</p>","PeriodicalId":18962,"journal":{"name":"南方医科大学学报杂志","volume":"46 8","pages":"1981-1992"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13458701/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"南方医科大学学报杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2026.08.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy is reshaping the treatment landscape of locally advanced gastric cancer (GC). The central clinical challenge has expanded from whether immunotherapy can enhance treatment efficacy to accurate identification of patients who are most likely to benefit and optimization of the subsequent surgical intervention. Accumulating evidence indicates that perioperative immunotherapy-based regimens can improve pathological complete response (pCR) rates and event-free survival (EFS) of the patients, promoting a shift from conventional chemotherapy plus radical surgery toward biomarker-guided, integrated precision treatment. For therapeutic stratification, microsatellite instability (MSI) status, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, and refined human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) classification have emerged as key indicators for predicting treatment response and selecting eligible patients. Meanwhile, treatment response assessment has evolved beyond conventional radiological evaluation to a multimodal framework incorporating pathological assessment, liquid biopsy, endoscopy, functional imaging, and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted analysis, thereby providing more comprehensive support for individualized therapeutic decision-making. However, improved treatment efficacy has also raised new questions for surgical management. In particular, discordant responses between primary tumors and regional lymph nodes have challenged whether D2 radical gastrectomy planned according to pretreatment clinical staging remains the optimal surgical strategy. This review systematically summarizes the evolution of neoadjuvant treatment strategies for locally advanced GC, comprehensive response assessment, and redefinition of gastrectomy extent and lymphadenectomy strategy. Looking forward, with the clinical translation of emerging therapeutic targets such as Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) and fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 (FGFR2), together with the maturation of AI-driven multimodal assessment systems, GC surgery may move beyond traditional anatomical boundaries. This transition potentially enables "maximally tolerated radical resection" to "function-preserving surgery guided by biological radicality", ultimately providing truly individualized precision surgical treatment for patients with locally advanced GC.

局部进展期胃癌新辅助免疫治疗后手术处理策略的思考
新辅助免疫治疗正在重塑局部晚期胃癌(GC)的治疗前景。临床的核心挑战已经从免疫疗法是否能提高治疗效果扩展到准确识别最有可能受益的患者和优化后续手术干预。越来越多的证据表明,围手术期基于免疫治疗的方案可以提高患者的病理完全缓解率(pCR)和无事件生存期(EFS),促进从传统化疗加根治性手术向生物标志物引导的综合精准治疗的转变。对于治疗分层,微卫星不稳定性(MSI)状态、程序性死亡配体1 (PD-L1)表达和精确的人表皮生长因子受体2 (HER2)分类已成为预测治疗反应和选择合格患者的关键指标。同时,治疗反应评估已从传统的放射学评估发展到病理评估、液体活检、内窥镜检查、功能成像和人工智能辅助分析的多模式框架,从而为个性化治疗决策提供更全面的支持。然而,治疗效果的提高也为手术治疗提出了新的问题。特别是原发肿瘤和区域淋巴结之间的不一致反应,对根据预处理临床分期计划D2根治性胃切除术是否仍然是最佳手术策略提出了质疑。本文系统总结了局部晚期胃癌新辅助治疗策略的发展、综合疗效评估、胃切除术范围和淋巴结切除术策略的重新定义。展望未来,随着Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2)和成纤维细胞生长因子受体2 (FGFR2)等新兴治疗靶点的临床转化,以及人工智能驱动的多模式评估系统的成熟,GC手术可能会超越传统的解剖学界限。这种转变有可能使“最大耐受根治性切除”向“生物根治性指导下的功能保留手术”转变,最终为局部晚期胃癌患者提供真正个性化的精准手术治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
南方医科大学学报杂志
南方医科大学学报杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
208
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书