Expanding OTC medicine access in non-pharmacy settings for self-medication: a scoping review.

IF 2.6 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Pub Date : 2026-08-07 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1080/20523211.2026.2701915
Adin Hakim Kurniawan, Rani Sauriasari, Agusdini Banun Saptaningsih, Rudi Safarudin, Syed Azhar Syed Sulaiman, Atika Wahyu Puspitasari
{"title":"Expanding OTC medicine access in non-pharmacy settings for self-medication: a scoping review.","authors":"Adin Hakim Kurniawan, Rani Sauriasari, Agusdini Banun Saptaningsih, Rudi Safarudin, Syed Azhar Syed Sulaiman, Atika Wahyu Puspitasari","doi":"10.1080/20523211.2026.2701915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In recent years, OTC distribution has expanded into non-pharmacy retail settings, with 19 of 30 European countries permitting non-pharmacy OTC sales. This may increase accessibility and promote self-medication, but it also creates risks of misuse, overdose, and greater retail market concentration. Therefore, countries have adopted various regulatory mechanisms to balance accessibility with patient safety. This scoping review aimed to examine the global regulatory models governing OTC dispensing and distribution at non-pharmacy retail settings, with particular emphasis on regulatory mechanisms influencing availability and accessibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted following the PCC framework and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR and JBI guidance. Literature published between January 2015 and August 2025 was identified through PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and citation searching. Eligible studies were selected through systematic screening and synthesised using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 295 studies, followed by the removal of 15 duplicates. After screening 280 unique studies, 8 met the inclusion criteria. Data from empirical studies and regulatory documents were synthesised. Three major themes were identified; the first was regulation and supervision, including medication classification, dispensing, pack-size limits, age restrictions, and oversight mechanisms. The second was self-medication and consumer behaviour, showing convenience-driven purchasing and limited risk awareness. The third was deregulation and service system changes, indicating expanded access through supermarkets, convenience stores, and online platforms, alongside concerns about safety and shifting market dynamics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scoping review indicates that deregulation, particularly in regions with limited healthcare access, enhances availability of medications and facilitates self-medication. Risk-based governance relies on safety-based classification, which establishes dispensing restrictions and determines where and how products may be accessed. These safeguards are further supported by controls such as pack-size limitations, mandated personnel qualifications, regulatory oversight, and consumer education to promote safe usage.</p>","PeriodicalId":16740,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","volume":"19 1","pages":"2701915"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13455694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20523211.2026.2701915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In recent years, OTC distribution has expanded into non-pharmacy retail settings, with 19 of 30 European countries permitting non-pharmacy OTC sales. This may increase accessibility and promote self-medication, but it also creates risks of misuse, overdose, and greater retail market concentration. Therefore, countries have adopted various regulatory mechanisms to balance accessibility with patient safety. This scoping review aimed to examine the global regulatory models governing OTC dispensing and distribution at non-pharmacy retail settings, with particular emphasis on regulatory mechanisms influencing availability and accessibility.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the PCC framework and reported in accordance with PRISMA-ScR and JBI guidance. Literature published between January 2015 and August 2025 was identified through PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, ScienceDirect, and citation searching. Eligible studies were selected through systematic screening and synthesised using thematic analysis.

Results: The search identified 295 studies, followed by the removal of 15 duplicates. After screening 280 unique studies, 8 met the inclusion criteria. Data from empirical studies and regulatory documents were synthesised. Three major themes were identified; the first was regulation and supervision, including medication classification, dispensing, pack-size limits, age restrictions, and oversight mechanisms. The second was self-medication and consumer behaviour, showing convenience-driven purchasing and limited risk awareness. The third was deregulation and service system changes, indicating expanded access through supermarkets, convenience stores, and online platforms, alongside concerns about safety and shifting market dynamics.

Conclusion: This scoping review indicates that deregulation, particularly in regions with limited healthcare access, enhances availability of medications and facilitates self-medication. Risk-based governance relies on safety-based classification, which establishes dispensing restrictions and determines where and how products may be accessed. These safeguards are further supported by controls such as pack-size limitations, mandated personnel qualifications, regulatory oversight, and consumer education to promote safe usage.

扩大非药房环境中自我药疗的非处方药获取:范围审查。
近年来,OTC分销已扩展到非药房零售环境,30个欧洲国家中有19个允许非药房OTC销售。这可能会增加可获得性并促进自我用药,但也会产生滥用、过量和零售市场集中度更高的风险。因此,各国采取了各种监管机制来平衡可及性与患者安全。这一范围审查旨在审查非药房零售环境中管理非处方药配药和分销的全球监管模式,特别强调影响可得性和可及性的监管机制。方法:根据PCC框架进行范围审查,并根据PRISMA-ScR和JBI指南进行报告。2015年1月至2025年8月间发表的文献通过PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus、ScienceDirect和引文搜索进行鉴定。通过系统筛选选择符合条件的研究,并利用专题分析进行综合。结果:检索确定了295项研究,随后删除了15项重复。在筛选了280项独特的研究后,有8项符合纳入标准。从实证研究和规范性文件的数据进行了综合。确定了三个主要主题;首先是管理和监督,包括药物分类、配药、包装大小限制、年龄限制和监督机制。其次是自我药疗和消费者行为,显示出便利驱动的购买和有限的风险意识。第三是放松管制和服务体系的变化,表明通过超市、便利店和在线平台扩大准入,以及对安全和市场动态变化的担忧。结论:这一范围审查表明,放松管制,特别是在医疗保健有限的地区,提高了药物的可得性,并促进了自我药疗。基于风险的治理依赖于基于安全的分类,它建立了分配限制,并确定了可以访问产品的位置和方式。这些保障措施还得到了诸如包装尺寸限制、强制性人员资格、监管监督和消费者教育等控制措施的进一步支持,以促进安全使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice
Journal of Pharmaceutical Policy and Practice Health Professions-Pharmacy
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
81
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书