Zhengrong Zhang, Tong Su, Meng Hui Li, Yang Ge, Hang Gao, Yongfu Zhu, Hang Song, Guoqi Zhu
{"title":"Bidirectional Neurobiological Interactions Between Cancer and PTSD: Mechanisms and Emerging Therapeutic Implications.","authors":"Zhengrong Zhang, Tong Su, Meng Hui Li, Yang Ge, Hang Gao, Yongfu Zhu, Hang Song, Guoqi Zhu","doi":"10.2174/011570159X468954260722100955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This review aims to illustrate the bidirectional neurobiological mechanisms underlying cancer and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) comorbidity, highlight the active regulatory role of the nervous system, and propose targeted intervention strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This narrative review was conducted by searching PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science for all years up to 2025. The following search terms were combined: \"PTSD\" AND \"Tumor microenvironment\" OR \"Neural circuit\" AND \"cancer\". Of the 1182 articles initially identified, 115 were enrolled in integrative analysis after duplicate removal, initial title/abstract screening, and overall text eligibility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As a traumatic stressor, cancer induces PTSD via diagnostic distress, treatment-related brain structural alterations, fear circuit activation, and neuroinflammation. PTSD, in turn, increases the risk of neoplastic development by disrupting the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) axis, leading to hyperactivity of the Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) and restructuring immune functions to create a pro-tumor microenvironment. Moreover, cancer cells can actively hijack neuronal functions to promote malignant progression by forming neuron-tumor synapses, internalizing neuronal mitochondria, and integrating into neural networks. The mechanisms we mentioned in the article - such as tumor synapse formation and transfer of neuronal mitochondria - mainly come from preclinical studies and have not yet obtained direct clinical evidence in humans.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Mental illness and cancer have a wide positive bidirectional relationship, which poses a challenge to the traditional dichotomy between physical illness and psychological disorders. This highlights the need to integrate mind-body treatment in the practice of oncology and psychiatry.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The nervous system is an active regulator and not a passive responder in patients with comorbid cancer and PTSD. Disruption of this pathological cycle requires the development of specific interventions that target neural signaling, metabolic crosstalk, and neuroendocrine pathways.</p>","PeriodicalId":10905,"journal":{"name":"Current Neuropharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Neuropharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/011570159X468954260722100955","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: This review aims to illustrate the bidirectional neurobiological mechanisms underlying cancer and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) comorbidity, highlight the active regulatory role of the nervous system, and propose targeted intervention strategies.
Methods: This narrative review was conducted by searching PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science for all years up to 2025. The following search terms were combined: "PTSD" AND "Tumor microenvironment" OR "Neural circuit" AND "cancer". Of the 1182 articles initially identified, 115 were enrolled in integrative analysis after duplicate removal, initial title/abstract screening, and overall text eligibility.
Results: As a traumatic stressor, cancer induces PTSD via diagnostic distress, treatment-related brain structural alterations, fear circuit activation, and neuroinflammation. PTSD, in turn, increases the risk of neoplastic development by disrupting the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) axis, leading to hyperactivity of the Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) and restructuring immune functions to create a pro-tumor microenvironment. Moreover, cancer cells can actively hijack neuronal functions to promote malignant progression by forming neuron-tumor synapses, internalizing neuronal mitochondria, and integrating into neural networks. The mechanisms we mentioned in the article - such as tumor synapse formation and transfer of neuronal mitochondria - mainly come from preclinical studies and have not yet obtained direct clinical evidence in humans.
Discussion: Mental illness and cancer have a wide positive bidirectional relationship, which poses a challenge to the traditional dichotomy between physical illness and psychological disorders. This highlights the need to integrate mind-body treatment in the practice of oncology and psychiatry.
Conclusion: The nervous system is an active regulator and not a passive responder in patients with comorbid cancer and PTSD. Disruption of this pathological cycle requires the development of specific interventions that target neural signaling, metabolic crosstalk, and neuroendocrine pathways.
目的:本文旨在阐明癌症与创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)共病的双向神经生物学机制,强调神经系统的积极调控作用,并提出有针对性的干预策略。方法:本文通过检索PubMed、b谷歌Scholar和Web of Science截至2025年的所有年份进行叙述性综述。以下搜索词组合:“创伤后应激障碍”和“肿瘤微环境”或“神经回路”和“癌症”。在最初确定的1182篇文章中,115篇在重复删除、初始标题/摘要筛选和总体文本合格性后纳入综合分析。结果:作为创伤性应激源,癌症通过诊断痛苦、治疗相关的脑结构改变、恐惧回路激活和神经炎症诱发PTSD。创伤后应激障碍,反过来,通过破坏下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺(HPA)轴,导致交感神经系统(SNS)的过度活跃和重建免疫功能,创造一个促肿瘤的微环境,增加肿瘤发展的风险。此外,癌细胞可以通过形成神经元-肿瘤突触、内化神经元线粒体、整合神经网络等方式,主动劫持神经元功能,促进恶性进展。我们在文章中提到的机制,如肿瘤突触的形成和神经元线粒体的转移,主要来自临床前研究,尚未在人体中获得直接的临床证据。讨论:精神疾病与癌症之间存在着广泛的正向双向关系,这对传统的生理疾病与心理障碍的二分法提出了挑战。这凸显了在肿瘤学和精神病学实践中整合身心治疗的必要性。结论:神经系统是癌症合并PTSD患者的主动调节者,而非被动反应者。这种病理循环的破坏需要针对神经信号、代谢串扰和神经内分泌途径的特定干预措施的发展。
期刊介绍:
Current Neuropharmacology aims to provide current, comprehensive/mini reviews and guest edited issues of all areas of neuropharmacology and related matters of neuroscience. The reviews cover the fields of molecular, cellular, and systems/behavioural aspects of neuropharmacology and neuroscience.
The journal serves as a comprehensive, multidisciplinary expert forum for neuropharmacologists and neuroscientists.