Does pre-operative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predict patient-reported pain and functional outcomes at 12 months after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Thomas Keith, Chinmay Tijare, Balint Borbas, Agbolahan Sofela, Himanshu Sharma, Temidayo Osunronbi
{"title":"Does pre-operative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predict patient-reported pain and functional outcomes at 12 months after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?","authors":"Thomas Keith, Chinmay Tijare, Balint Borbas, Agbolahan Sofela, Himanshu Sharma, Temidayo Osunronbi","doi":"10.1080/02688697.2026.2714953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been found in various fields to be a predictor of post-operative pain and functional outcomes. To date no studies have looked at NLR in relation to patient outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The primary aim is to determine the relationship between pre-operative NLR, pain and functional outcomes at 12-months post elective ACDF.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This single-centre retrospective cohort study included 60 patients undergoing 1 or 2 level ACDF. Pre-operative NLR and demographic data were collected. Visual analogue scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain, and Neck Disability Index (NDI) were collected at baseline and 12 months postoperatively. Binary logistic regression was used to estimate the associations of demographic factors and NLR with improvement in VAS and NDI scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A unit increase in NLR was associated with a 56% decrease in the odds of improvement in neck pain (OR: 0.44; CI: 0.21-0.89, p = 0.02). NLR was not found to be a statistically significant predictor of improvement in VAS Arm or NDI. Higher baseline VAS arm and neck scores were associated with greater odds of improvement in pain postoperatively. Compared to patients with cervical disc herniation, those with cervical stenosis had a 72% decrease in the odds of substantial clinical benefit in NDI score (OR: 0.28 CI: 0.09-0.91, p = 0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elevated preoperative NLR was associated with lower odds of neck pain improvement after ACDF but did not predict disability or arm pain improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":9261,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2026.2714953","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been found in various fields to be a predictor of post-operative pain and functional outcomes. To date no studies have looked at NLR in relation to patient outcomes after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The primary aim is to determine the relationship between pre-operative NLR, pain and functional outcomes at 12-months post elective ACDF.

Materials and methods: This single-centre retrospective cohort study included 60 patients undergoing 1 or 2 level ACDF. Pre-operative NLR and demographic data were collected. Visual analogue scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain, and Neck Disability Index (NDI) were collected at baseline and 12 months postoperatively. Binary logistic regression was used to estimate the associations of demographic factors and NLR with improvement in VAS and NDI scores.

Results: A unit increase in NLR was associated with a 56% decrease in the odds of improvement in neck pain (OR: 0.44; CI: 0.21-0.89, p = 0.02). NLR was not found to be a statistically significant predictor of improvement in VAS Arm or NDI. Higher baseline VAS arm and neck scores were associated with greater odds of improvement in pain postoperatively. Compared to patients with cervical disc herniation, those with cervical stenosis had a 72% decrease in the odds of substantial clinical benefit in NDI score (OR: 0.28 CI: 0.09-0.91, p = 0.03).

Conclusion: Elevated preoperative NLR was associated with lower odds of neck pain improvement after ACDF but did not predict disability or arm pain improvement.

术前中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比值能否预测颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术后12个月患者报告的疼痛和功能结局?
前言:术前中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率(NLR)已在多个领域被发现是术后疼痛和功能预后的预测指标。到目前为止,还没有研究观察NLR与前路颈椎椎间盘切除术和融合(ACDF)后患者预后的关系。主要目的是确定选择性ACDF后12个月的术前NLR、疼痛和功能预后之间的关系。材料和方法:这项单中心回顾性队列研究包括60例接受1级或2级ACDF的患者。收集术前NLR和人口统计数据。在基线和术后12个月收集颈、臂疼痛的视觉模拟评分(VAS)和颈部残疾指数(NDI)。采用二元logistic回归估计人口统计学因素和NLR与VAS和NDI评分改善的关系。结果:NLR的单位增加与颈部疼痛改善的几率降低56%相关(OR: 0.44; CI: 0.21-0.89, p = 0.02)。未发现NLR是VAS组或NDI改善的统计学显著预测因子。较高的基线VAS手臂和颈部评分与术后疼痛改善的可能性较大相关。与颈椎间盘突出患者相比,颈狭窄患者在NDI评分中获得实质性临床获益的几率降低了72% (OR: 0.28 CI: 0.09-0.91, p = 0.03)。结论:术前NLR升高与ACDF后颈部疼痛改善的几率较低相关,但不能预测残疾或手臂疼痛改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Neurosurgery
British Journal of Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
139
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Neurosurgery is a leading international forum for debate in the field of neurosurgery, publishing original peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality, along with comment and correspondence on all topics of current interest to neurosurgeons worldwide. Coverage includes all aspects of case assessment and surgical practice, as well as wide-ranging research, with an emphasis on clinical rather than experimental material. Special emphasis is placed on postgraduate education with review articles on basic neurosciences and on the theory behind advances in techniques, investigation and clinical management. All papers are submitted to rigorous and independent peer-review, ensuring the journal’s wide citation and its appearance in the major abstracting and indexing services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书