Incidence, Management, and Clinical Outcomes of Cardiovascular Adverse Events in Patients Receiving ALK Inhibitors for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Single-Center Analysis.
{"title":"Incidence, Management, and Clinical Outcomes of Cardiovascular Adverse Events in Patients Receiving ALK Inhibitors for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Single-Center Analysis.","authors":"Xianglong Zhou, Chunli Song, Xinyuan Meng","doi":"10.1080/07357907.2026.2711635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cardiovascular adverse event (CVAE) profiles across ALK-TKI generations remain incompletely characterized in real-world practice. A retrospective study of 235 ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients receiving first-, second-, or third-generation ALK-TKIs assessed CVAE incidence, severity, timing, management, and impact on progression-free survival (PFS). Sixty patients (25.5%; 95% CI, 20.4-31.5) experienced 72 CVAEs. Bradycardia (12.8%) was most common. Overall CVAE incidence did not differ between first- (26.9%) and second-/third-generation (25.0%) agents. Hypertension was numerically more frequent with later-generation agents (9.5% vs. 1.5%; uncorrected P = 0.047), but this difference did not remain significant after correction for multiple comparisons and should be regarded as exploratory; in agent-level analysis hypertension was most frequent with lorlatinib (35.0%). Median time to onset was 44 days. Thromboembolic events were the most severe category (71.4% grade ≥3) with the lowest resolution rate (57.1%), whereas 87.5% of all CVAEs resolved or improved. CVAE occurrence was not significantly associated with PFS (time-dependent adjusted HR 1.05; 95% CI, 0.74-1.48), a finding robust across fully adjusted and switch-excluded sensitivity models. ALK-TKIs carry a meaningful CVAE burden with generation- and agent-specific profiles. Risk-adapted monitoring aligned with temporal and pharmacological characteristics may improve management without compromising oncologic outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9463,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07357907.2026.2711635","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cardiovascular adverse event (CVAE) profiles across ALK-TKI generations remain incompletely characterized in real-world practice. A retrospective study of 235 ALK-rearranged NSCLC patients receiving first-, second-, or third-generation ALK-TKIs assessed CVAE incidence, severity, timing, management, and impact on progression-free survival (PFS). Sixty patients (25.5%; 95% CI, 20.4-31.5) experienced 72 CVAEs. Bradycardia (12.8%) was most common. Overall CVAE incidence did not differ between first- (26.9%) and second-/third-generation (25.0%) agents. Hypertension was numerically more frequent with later-generation agents (9.5% vs. 1.5%; uncorrected P = 0.047), but this difference did not remain significant after correction for multiple comparisons and should be regarded as exploratory; in agent-level analysis hypertension was most frequent with lorlatinib (35.0%). Median time to onset was 44 days. Thromboembolic events were the most severe category (71.4% grade ≥3) with the lowest resolution rate (57.1%), whereas 87.5% of all CVAEs resolved or improved. CVAE occurrence was not significantly associated with PFS (time-dependent adjusted HR 1.05; 95% CI, 0.74-1.48), a finding robust across fully adjusted and switch-excluded sensitivity models. ALK-TKIs carry a meaningful CVAE burden with generation- and agent-specific profiles. Risk-adapted monitoring aligned with temporal and pharmacological characteristics may improve management without compromising oncologic outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Investigation is one of the most highly regarded and recognized journals in the field of basic and clinical oncology. It is designed to give physicians a comprehensive resource on the current state of progress in the cancer field as well as a broad background of reliable information necessary for effective decision making. In addition to presenting original papers of fundamental significance, it also publishes reviews, essays, specialized presentations of controversies, considerations of new technologies and their applications to specific laboratory problems, discussions of public issues, miniseries on major topics, new and experimental drugs and therapies, and an innovative letters to the editor section. One of the unique features of the journal is its departmentalized editorial sections reporting on more than 30 subject categories covering the broad spectrum of specialized areas that together comprise the field of oncology. Edited by leading physicians and research scientists, these sections make Cancer Investigation the prime resource for clinicians seeking to make sense of the sometimes-overwhelming amount of information available throughout the field. In addition to its peer-reviewed clinical research, the journal also features translational studies that bridge the gap between the laboratory and the clinic.