Impact of Postoperative Infectious Complications on Long-Term Survival After Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Study in the Minimally Invasive Era.

IF 3.2 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Takehito Yamamoto, Ryosuke Mizuno, Yoshiro Itatani, Tetsuya Shiota, Masahiro Yamada, Tadayoshi Yamaura, Mami Yoshitomi, Kazutaka Obama
{"title":"Impact of Postoperative Infectious Complications on Long-Term Survival After Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Study in the Minimally Invasive Era.","authors":"Takehito Yamamoto, Ryosuke Mizuno, Yoshiro Itatani, Tetsuya Shiota, Masahiro Yamada, Tadayoshi Yamaura, Mami Yoshitomi, Kazutaka Obama","doi":"10.1002/ags3.70261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Previous studies have reported that postoperative infectious complications (PICs) worsen long-term outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery; however, most were conducted before widespread adoption of minimally invasive surgery. We evaluated the association between PICs and long-term oncological outcomes after curative colorectal cancer resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, retrospective cohort study enrolled patients who underwent curative resection for colorectal adenocarcinoma between 2017 and 2021 at 19 hospitals in Japan. PICs were defined as Clavien-Dindo grade≥II infectious complications within 30 days after surgery. Multivariable Cox regression and propensity score matching (1:4) were used to evaluate associations with overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 5377 patients, 90.6% underwent laparoscopic or robot-assisted surgery, and PICs occurred in 500 (9.3%). In multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, PICs were independently associated with worse OS (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.01-1.72; <i>p</i> = 0.040) and RFS (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.04-1.54; <i>p</i> = 0.020). After propensity score matching (500 vs. 1931 patients), PICs remained significantly associated with poorer OS and RFS. Patients with PICs had a higher rate of distant recurrence (5-year rate, 19.1% vs. 15.2%; HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.02-1.72; <i>p</i> = 0.03), whereas locoregional recurrence did not differ significantly.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PICs are associated with impaired long-term survival after curative colorectal cancer surgery, even in the modern minimally invasive era. Preventing postoperative infections is important to improve perioperative recovery and long-term oncological outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":8030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13456115/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.70261","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Previous studies have reported that postoperative infectious complications (PICs) worsen long-term outcomes after colorectal cancer surgery; however, most were conducted before widespread adoption of minimally invasive surgery. We evaluated the association between PICs and long-term oncological outcomes after curative colorectal cancer resection.

Methods: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study enrolled patients who underwent curative resection for colorectal adenocarcinoma between 2017 and 2021 at 19 hospitals in Japan. PICs were defined as Clavien-Dindo grade≥II infectious complications within 30 days after surgery. Multivariable Cox regression and propensity score matching (1:4) were used to evaluate associations with overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS).

Results: Among 5377 patients, 90.6% underwent laparoscopic or robot-assisted surgery, and PICs occurred in 500 (9.3%). In multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, PICs were independently associated with worse OS (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.01-1.72; p = 0.040) and RFS (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.04-1.54; p = 0.020). After propensity score matching (500 vs. 1931 patients), PICs remained significantly associated with poorer OS and RFS. Patients with PICs had a higher rate of distant recurrence (5-year rate, 19.1% vs. 15.2%; HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.02-1.72; p = 0.03), whereas locoregional recurrence did not differ significantly.

Conclusion: PICs are associated with impaired long-term survival after curative colorectal cancer surgery, even in the modern minimally invasive era. Preventing postoperative infections is important to improve perioperative recovery and long-term oncological outcomes.

微创时代的多中心研究:术后感染并发症对结直肠癌根治性切除术后长期生存的影响
目的:先前的研究报道了术后感染并发症(PICs)恶化结直肠癌手术后的长期预后;然而,大多数是在广泛采用微创手术之前进行的。我们评估了PICs与结直肠癌治愈性切除术后长期肿瘤预后之间的关系。方法:这项多中心、回顾性队列研究纳入了2017年至2021年间在日本19家医院接受根治性结直肠癌切除术的患者。PICs定义为术后30天内Clavien-Dindo级≥II级感染性并发症。采用多变量Cox回归和倾向评分匹配(1:4)来评估与总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS)的关系。结果:5377例患者中,90.6%接受了腹腔镜或机器人辅助手术,500例(9.3%)发生PICs。在多变量Cox比例风险分析中,PICs与较差的OS (HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.01-1.72; p = 0.040)和RFS (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.04-1.54; p = 0.020)独立相关。在倾向评分匹配后(500对1931),PICs仍然与较差的OS和RFS显著相关。PICs患者远端复发率更高(5年复发率,19.1%对15.2%;HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.02-1.72; p = 0.03),而局部区域复发率无显著差异。结论:即使在现代微创时代,PICs也与结直肠癌手术后的长期生存受损有关。预防术后感染对于改善围手术期恢复和长期肿瘤预后非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
98
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书