Status Dystonicus: An Updated Review on Diagnosis, Pathophysiology, and Management.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-04 DOI:10.4103/aian.aian_1122_25
Vedang N Desai, Arunav Garg, Arnesh Bhattacharya, Mahak Golani, Debashish Chowdhury
{"title":"Status Dystonicus: An Updated Review on Diagnosis, Pathophysiology, and Management.","authors":"Vedang N Desai, Arunav Garg, Arnesh Bhattacharya, Mahak Golani, Debashish Chowdhury","doi":"10.4103/aian.aian_1122_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Status dystonicus (SD), also called dystonic storm or dystonic crisis historically, represents a rare and life-threatening exacerbation of dystonia characterized by continuous (tonic) or phasic rapidly recurring dystonic spasms. Common triggers include infections, abrupt changes in medication, and metabolic stress, among others, and necessitate early recognition with multidisciplinary management to prevent multisystemic failure or dysfunction. SD arises in patients with generalized dystonia, more commonly in those with secondary causes, and is associated with basal ganglia dysfunction and predominantly dopaminergic disturbances. The Dystonia Severity Action Plan is a widely accepted staging tool that requires bedside assessment and helps inform therapeutic decisions and intervention levels. Management principles center on identifying and removing triggers, optimizing sedation and airway management, and administering disease-specific therapies. The review aims to provide an overview of the clinical spectrum, the physiological basis, commonly described precipitating factors, and updated management strategies for SD, highlighting a practical approach to the early identification of the syndrome and the bundling of care. A narrative review of peer-reviewed literature from PubMed and Scopus databases was conducted, with emphasis on publications covering etiopathogenesis, risk factors, clinical grading systems, therapeutic options, and outcomes. Key consensus guidelines and case series were appraised. It is evident that early diagnosis and triage, with adequate management, are key to improving survival and neurological outcomes in SD. Adoption of standardized clinical pathways and multicenter data reports will help improve understanding of SD's natural history, clinical evaluation, and therapeutic efficacy across different etiologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8036,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology","volume":" ","pages":"501-509"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13544879/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aian.aian_1122_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Status dystonicus (SD), also called dystonic storm or dystonic crisis historically, represents a rare and life-threatening exacerbation of dystonia characterized by continuous (tonic) or phasic rapidly recurring dystonic spasms. Common triggers include infections, abrupt changes in medication, and metabolic stress, among others, and necessitate early recognition with multidisciplinary management to prevent multisystemic failure or dysfunction. SD arises in patients with generalized dystonia, more commonly in those with secondary causes, and is associated with basal ganglia dysfunction and predominantly dopaminergic disturbances. The Dystonia Severity Action Plan is a widely accepted staging tool that requires bedside assessment and helps inform therapeutic decisions and intervention levels. Management principles center on identifying and removing triggers, optimizing sedation and airway management, and administering disease-specific therapies. The review aims to provide an overview of the clinical spectrum, the physiological basis, commonly described precipitating factors, and updated management strategies for SD, highlighting a practical approach to the early identification of the syndrome and the bundling of care. A narrative review of peer-reviewed literature from PubMed and Scopus databases was conducted, with emphasis on publications covering etiopathogenesis, risk factors, clinical grading systems, therapeutic options, and outcomes. Key consensus guidelines and case series were appraised. It is evident that early diagnosis and triage, with adequate management, are key to improving survival and neurological outcomes in SD. Adoption of standardized clinical pathways and multicenter data reports will help improve understanding of SD's natural history, clinical evaluation, and therapeutic efficacy across different etiologies.

状态失调:诊断、病理生理学和治疗的最新综述。
摘要:肌张力状态障碍(SD),历史上也被称为肌张力障碍风暴或肌张力障碍危机,是一种罕见的、危及生命的肌张力障碍恶化,其特征是连续(强直性)或阶段性快速复发的肌张力障碍痉挛。常见的诱发因素包括感染、药物突变和代谢应激等,需要通过多学科管理进行早期识别,以防止多系统衰竭或功能障碍。SD见于全身性肌张力障碍患者,更常见于继发性病因患者,并与基底神经节功能障碍和主要的多巴胺能障碍有关。肌张力障碍严重程度行动计划是一种广泛接受的分期工具,需要床边评估,有助于告知治疗决策和干预水平。管理原则集中在识别和消除诱因,优化镇静和气道管理,以及实施疾病特异性治疗。本综述旨在概述SD的临床谱、生理基础、常见的诱发因素和最新的管理策略,强调早期识别该综合征和捆绑治疗的实用方法。对PubMed和Scopus数据库中同行评议的文献进行了叙叙性回顾,重点关注涵盖发病机制、风险因素、临床分级系统、治疗方案和结果的出版物。评估了关键共识指南和病例系列。很明显,早期诊断和分诊,适当的管理,是提高SD患者生存率和神经预后的关键。采用标准化的临床路径和多中心数据报告将有助于提高对SD的自然史、临床评估和不同病因的治疗效果的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology
Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology Nervous System Diseases-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
293
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal has a clinical foundation and has been utilized most by clinical neurologists for improving the practice of neurology. While the focus is on neurology in India, the journal publishes manuscripts of high value from all parts of the world. Journal publishes reviews of various types, original articles, short communications, interesting images and case reports. The journal respects the scientific submission of its authors and believes in following an expeditious double-blind peer review process and endeavors to complete the review process within scheduled time frame. A significant effort from the author and the journal perhaps enables to strike an equilibrium to meet the professional expectations of the peers in the world of scientific publication. AIAN believes in safeguarding the privacy rights of human subjects. In order to comply with it, the journal instructs all authors when uploading the manuscript to also add the ethical clearance (human/animals)/ informed consent of subject in the manuscript. This applies to the study/case report that involves animal/human subjects/human specimens e.g. extracted tooth part/soft tissue for biopsy/in vitro analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书