A novel closed book parenchyma sparing technique for giant pulmonary hydatid cysts.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Klein Dantis
{"title":"A novel closed book parenchyma sparing technique for giant pulmonary hydatid cysts.","authors":"Klein Dantis","doi":"10.1080/00015458.2026.2718207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Giant pulmonary hydatid cysts (GHCs), defined as cysts measuring ≥10 cm, pose significant surgical challenges owing to their large size and distortion of the native lung architecture, which often limits the effectiveness of conventional capitonnage. This study evaluates the feasibility and early clinical outcomes of a novel closed-book parenchyma-sparing technique designed to achieve complete residual cavity obliteration while preserving functional lung parenchyma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on 12 consecutive patients with GHCs who underwent surgery between September 2022 and August 2025. Diagnosis was confirmed by contrast-enhanced computed tomography. The closed-book technique involved controlled cyst evacuation, meticulous bronchial closure, and symmetrical bidirectional intracystic plication. Patients were followed for 15 months to assess postoperative complications, lung re-expansion, and recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean patient age was 33.4 years, with female predominance (75%). Cyst size ranged from 11 to 16 cm (mean 13.5 cm), most commonly involving the right lower lobe and left upper lobe. Four patients presented with ruptured cysts. The technique achieved complete lung re-expansion in all cases. No postoperative air leaks, empyema, atelectasis, surgical site infection, residual cavity, recurrence, or mortality were observed during the 15-month follow-up. One patient developed a transient pleural effusion that resolved spontaneously. The mean hospital stay was 12.9 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The closed-book parenchyma-sparing technique is a feasible and promising lung-preserving approach for GHCs. Larger prospective comparative studies are warranted to validate its safety, reproducibility, and long-term effectiveness.<b>Abbreviations</b>: CECT; contrast-enhanced computed tomography; GHCs: giant pulmonary hydatid cysts.</p>","PeriodicalId":6935,"journal":{"name":"Acta Chirurgica Belgica","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Chirurgica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2026.2718207","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Giant pulmonary hydatid cysts (GHCs), defined as cysts measuring ≥10 cm, pose significant surgical challenges owing to their large size and distortion of the native lung architecture, which often limits the effectiveness of conventional capitonnage. This study evaluates the feasibility and early clinical outcomes of a novel closed-book parenchyma-sparing technique designed to achieve complete residual cavity obliteration while preserving functional lung parenchyma.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 12 consecutive patients with GHCs who underwent surgery between September 2022 and August 2025. Diagnosis was confirmed by contrast-enhanced computed tomography. The closed-book technique involved controlled cyst evacuation, meticulous bronchial closure, and symmetrical bidirectional intracystic plication. Patients were followed for 15 months to assess postoperative complications, lung re-expansion, and recurrence.

Results: The mean patient age was 33.4 years, with female predominance (75%). Cyst size ranged from 11 to 16 cm (mean 13.5 cm), most commonly involving the right lower lobe and left upper lobe. Four patients presented with ruptured cysts. The technique achieved complete lung re-expansion in all cases. No postoperative air leaks, empyema, atelectasis, surgical site infection, residual cavity, recurrence, or mortality were observed during the 15-month follow-up. One patient developed a transient pleural effusion that resolved spontaneously. The mean hospital stay was 12.9 days.

Conclusion: The closed-book parenchyma-sparing technique is a feasible and promising lung-preserving approach for GHCs. Larger prospective comparative studies are warranted to validate its safety, reproducibility, and long-term effectiveness.Abbreviations: CECT; contrast-enhanced computed tomography; GHCs: giant pulmonary hydatid cysts.

一种治疗巨大肺包虫囊肿的新颖闭卷保留实质技术。
背景:巨大肺包虫囊肿(GHCs),定义为直径≥10cm的囊肿,由于其巨大的尺寸和固有肺结构的扭曲,通常限制了传统capitonge的有效性,给手术带来了重大挑战。本研究评估了一种新颖的闭卷保留肺实质技术的可行性和早期临床结果,该技术旨在在保留功能性肺实质的同时实现完全的残余腔闭塞。方法:对2022年9月至2025年8月期间连续12例接受手术治疗的GHCs患者进行回顾性分析。通过对比增强计算机断层扫描确诊。闭书技术包括有控制的囊肿排出、细致的支气管闭合和对称的双向囊内应用。随访15个月,评估术后并发症、肺再扩张和复发情况。结果:患者平均年龄33.4岁,女性居多(75%)。囊肿大小为11-16 cm(平均13.5 cm),最常累及右下肺叶和左上肺叶。4例患者表现为囊肿破裂。该技术在所有病例中实现了完全的肺再扩张。术后15个月随访,无漏气、脓胸、肺不张、手术部位感染、腔残留、复发、死亡。一名患者出现短暂性胸腔积液,并自行消退。平均住院时间为12.9天。结论:闭卷保留肺组织技术是一种可行的、有前景的肺保存方法。需要更大规模的前瞻性比较研究来验证其安全性、可重复性和长期有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Chirurgica Belgica
Acta Chirurgica Belgica 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Chirurgica Belgica (ACB) is the official journal of the Royal Belgian Society for Surgery (RBSS) and its affiliated societies. It publishes Editorials, Review papers, Original Research, and Technique related manuscripts in the broad field of Clinical Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书