Hiren Patel, Haren Pandya, Nimisha Desai, Nitu Shah, Mukarram Devla, K S Athira
{"title":"Comparison of Effectiveness of Pharmacological and Non-pharmacological Management of Temporomandibular Joint Pain - A Systematic Review.","authors":"Hiren Patel, Haren Pandya, Nimisha Desai, Nitu Shah, Mukarram Devla, K S Athira","doi":"10.4103/ams.ams_122_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are a heterogeneous group of conditions affecting the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and masticatory musculature, commonly presenting with pain and functional limitation. Although both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment modalities are widely used, their relative effectiveness remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To systematically compare the clinical effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions in the management of TMJ-related pain and dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA-2020 guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42025641487). Electronic searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were performed for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2014 and 2024. Adult patients diagnosed with TMDs were included. Primary outcomes were pain reduction and improvement in mandibular function. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB-2 tool.</p><p><strong>Study eligibility criteria: </strong>Eighteen RCTs comprising 871 participants were included. Pharmacological interventions (NSAIDs, corticosteroids, muscle relaxants, hyaluronic acid and platelet-based injectables) demonstrated effective short-term pain relief, with benefits often diminishing beyond 4-6 weeks.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Non-pharmacological interventions (physiotherapy, occlusal splints, exercise therapy, low-level laser therapy and behavioural therapy) showed more consistent and sustained improvements in pain, mandibular mobility, and patient-reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Study appraisal: </strong>Combined conservative approaches yielded superior and longer-lasting results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Non-pharmacological modalities appear to provide superior long-term outcomes in TMD management and should be considered first-line therapy. Pharmacological agents remain useful as adjuncts, particularly for acute symptom control.</p>","PeriodicalId":7972,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"16 1","pages":"79-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13456648/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ams.ams_122_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are a heterogeneous group of conditions affecting the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and masticatory musculature, commonly presenting with pain and functional limitation. Although both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment modalities are widely used, their relative effectiveness remains unclear.
Objectives: To systematically compare the clinical effectiveness of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions in the management of TMJ-related pain and dysfunction.
Data sources: This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA-2020 guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (CRD42025641487). Electronic searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Cochrane Library were performed for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2014 and 2024. Adult patients diagnosed with TMDs were included. Primary outcomes were pain reduction and improvement in mandibular function. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB-2 tool.
Study eligibility criteria: Eighteen RCTs comprising 871 participants were included. Pharmacological interventions (NSAIDs, corticosteroids, muscle relaxants, hyaluronic acid and platelet-based injectables) demonstrated effective short-term pain relief, with benefits often diminishing beyond 4-6 weeks.
Interventions: Non-pharmacological interventions (physiotherapy, occlusal splints, exercise therapy, low-level laser therapy and behavioural therapy) showed more consistent and sustained improvements in pain, mandibular mobility, and patient-reported outcomes.
Study appraisal: Combined conservative approaches yielded superior and longer-lasting results.
Conclusions: Non-pharmacological modalities appear to provide superior long-term outcomes in TMD management and should be considered first-line therapy. Pharmacological agents remain useful as adjuncts, particularly for acute symptom control.
背景:颞下颌关节疾病(TMDs)是一种影响颞下颌关节(TMJ)和咀嚼肌肉组织的异质性疾病,通常表现为疼痛和功能限制。虽然药物和非药物治疗方式被广泛使用,但其相对效果尚不清楚。目的:系统比较药物和非药物干预治疗颞下颌关节相关疼痛和功能障碍的临床效果。数据来源:本系统评价按照PRISMA-2020指南进行,并在PROSPERO注册(CRD42025641487)。电子检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane Library,检索2014年至2024年间发表的随机对照试验(rct)。被诊断为tmd的成年患者被纳入研究对象。主要结果是疼痛减轻和下颌功能改善。使用Cochrane rob2工具评估偏倚风险(RoB)。研究资格标准:纳入18项随机对照试验,共871名受试者。药物干预(非甾体抗炎药、皮质类固醇、肌肉松弛剂、透明质酸和基于血小板的注射剂)显示出有效的短期疼痛缓解,效果通常在4-6周后逐渐减弱。干预措施:非药物干预(物理治疗、咬合夹板、运动治疗、低水平激光治疗和行为治疗)在疼痛、下颌活动和患者报告的结果方面显示出更一致和持续的改善。研究评价:联合保守方法产生了更好和更持久的效果。结论:非药物治疗方式在TMD治疗中具有较好的长期疗效,应考虑一线治疗。药理学药物仍然是有用的辅助手段,特别是对急性症状控制。