Improving Digital Transformation Outcomes and Pace: The Role of the Board and C-Suite in Reducing Transformation Friction

IF 8.2 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Information Systems Journal Pub Date : 2026-08-11 Epub Date: 2026-01-30 DOI:10.1111/isj.70028
Natalie Smith, Andrew Burton-Jones
{"title":"Improving Digital Transformation Outcomes and Pace: The Role of the Board and C-Suite in Reducing Transformation Friction","authors":"Natalie Smith,&nbsp;Andrew Burton-Jones","doi":"10.1111/isj.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Most organisations are confronting a dilemma: the need to embark on digital transformation to be competitive and sustainable versus the inherently high costs and extremely high risks involved. Lack of executive support has long been identified as a leading cause of project failure, including digital transformation projects. What is not clear is what that support should entail. The prevailing practice—to strategise, delegate and monitor the transformation, but not get too involved—stems from a time when projects, organisations, and the context they operated in were less complex. Our research was motivated by the lack of guidance for Boards and C-suite despite the criticality of their role. We consulted over100 organisational leaders and followed an in-flight digital transformation, comparing transformations perceived to be successful with those that were not. We learnt that the governance and leadership traditions that serve stable organisations create blind spots to the forces at play when transforming. We term these forces <i>transformation friction</i> and identify a mindset shift and four practices the Board and C-suite can use to improve the pace and outcomes of digital transformation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"36 5","pages":"652-660"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.70028","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/isj.70028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most organisations are confronting a dilemma: the need to embark on digital transformation to be competitive and sustainable versus the inherently high costs and extremely high risks involved. Lack of executive support has long been identified as a leading cause of project failure, including digital transformation projects. What is not clear is what that support should entail. The prevailing practice—to strategise, delegate and monitor the transformation, but not get too involved—stems from a time when projects, organisations, and the context they operated in were less complex. Our research was motivated by the lack of guidance for Boards and C-suite despite the criticality of their role. We consulted over100 organisational leaders and followed an in-flight digital transformation, comparing transformations perceived to be successful with those that were not. We learnt that the governance and leadership traditions that serve stable organisations create blind spots to the forces at play when transforming. We term these forces transformation friction and identify a mindset shift and four practices the Board and C-suite can use to improve the pace and outcomes of digital transformation.

Abstract Image

改善数字化转型成果和步伐:董事会和高管在减少转型摩擦中的作用
大多数组织都面临着两难境地:需要进行数字化转型以保持竞争力和可持续性,而数字化转型本身就存在高成本和极高风险。长期以来,缺乏行政支持一直被认为是导致项目失败的主要原因,包括数字化转型项目。目前尚不清楚的是,这种支持应该包括哪些内容。流行的做法是制定战略、授权和监督转型,但不太参与其中,这源于一个项目、组织和它们所处的环境不那么复杂的时代。尽管董事会和高管层的角色至关重要,但缺乏对他们的指导,这促使我们进行了研究。我们咨询了100多家组织的领导者,并跟踪了一项正在进行的数字化转型,比较了那些被认为是成功的转型和那些不成功的转型。我们了解到,服务于稳定组织的治理和领导传统,在转型过程中对发挥作用的力量造成了盲点。我们将这些力量称为“转型摩擦”,并确定了一种思维转变,以及董事会和高管可以采用的四种做法,以提高数字化转型的速度和成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information Systems Journal
Information Systems Journal INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
7.80%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Information Systems Journal (ISJ) is an international journal promoting the study of, and interest in, information systems. Articles are welcome on research, practice, experience, current issues and debates. The ISJ encourages submissions that reflect the wide and interdisciplinary nature of the subject and articles that integrate technological disciplines with social, contextual and management issues, based on research using appropriate research methods.The ISJ has particularly built its reputation by publishing qualitative research and it continues to welcome such papers. Quantitative research papers are also welcome but they need to emphasise the context of the research and the theoretical and practical implications of their findings.The ISJ does not publish purely technical papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书