{"title":"Improving Digital Transformation Outcomes and Pace: The Role of the Board and C-Suite in Reducing Transformation Friction","authors":"Natalie Smith, Andrew Burton-Jones","doi":"10.1111/isj.70028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Most organisations are confronting a dilemma: the need to embark on digital transformation to be competitive and sustainable versus the inherently high costs and extremely high risks involved. Lack of executive support has long been identified as a leading cause of project failure, including digital transformation projects. What is not clear is what that support should entail. The prevailing practice—to strategise, delegate and monitor the transformation, but not get too involved—stems from a time when projects, organisations, and the context they operated in were less complex. Our research was motivated by the lack of guidance for Boards and C-suite despite the criticality of their role. We consulted over100 organisational leaders and followed an in-flight digital transformation, comparing transformations perceived to be successful with those that were not. We learnt that the governance and leadership traditions that serve stable organisations create blind spots to the forces at play when transforming. We term these forces <i>transformation friction</i> and identify a mindset shift and four practices the Board and C-suite can use to improve the pace and outcomes of digital transformation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"36 5","pages":"652-660"},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.70028","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/isj.70028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Most organisations are confronting a dilemma: the need to embark on digital transformation to be competitive and sustainable versus the inherently high costs and extremely high risks involved. Lack of executive support has long been identified as a leading cause of project failure, including digital transformation projects. What is not clear is what that support should entail. The prevailing practice—to strategise, delegate and monitor the transformation, but not get too involved—stems from a time when projects, organisations, and the context they operated in were less complex. Our research was motivated by the lack of guidance for Boards and C-suite despite the criticality of their role. We consulted over100 organisational leaders and followed an in-flight digital transformation, comparing transformations perceived to be successful with those that were not. We learnt that the governance and leadership traditions that serve stable organisations create blind spots to the forces at play when transforming. We term these forces transformation friction and identify a mindset shift and four practices the Board and C-suite can use to improve the pace and outcomes of digital transformation.
期刊介绍:
The Information Systems Journal (ISJ) is an international journal promoting the study of, and interest in, information systems. Articles are welcome on research, practice, experience, current issues and debates. The ISJ encourages submissions that reflect the wide and interdisciplinary nature of the subject and articles that integrate technological disciplines with social, contextual and management issues, based on research using appropriate research methods.The ISJ has particularly built its reputation by publishing qualitative research and it continues to welcome such papers. Quantitative research papers are also welcome but they need to emphasise the context of the research and the theoretical and practical implications of their findings.The ISJ does not publish purely technical papers.