Doxycycline versus azithromycin as combination therapy in the empirical treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in an intensive care unit - A retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Sin Man Lam, Hoi Ping Shum
{"title":"Doxycycline versus azithromycin as combination therapy in the empirical treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in an intensive care unit - A retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.","authors":"Sin Man Lam, Hoi Ping Shum","doi":"10.1016/j.jmii.2026.07.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Community-acquired pneumonia constitutes a significant burden to healthcare systems. While international guidelines recommend beta-lactam plus macrolide in treating severe community-acquired pneumonia, doxycycline instead of macrolide provides antimicrobial activity to macrolide-resistant organisms that are highly prevalent in East Asia and avoids its side effects. Yet, doxycycline's immunomodulatory effect is not as well studied. We investigated the comparative efficacy of doxycycline with azithromycin in the treatment of severe community-acquired pneumonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2023, consecutive adult patients with pneumonia or pulmonary sepsis requiring intensive care within 48 h of hospital admission, who received a beta-lactam in combination with either azithromycin or doxycycline were retrospectively reviewed. The two groups were matched by propensity scores and compared for all-cause mortality at day 30.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 670 patients were analysed. Streptococcus pneumoniae was the dominant bacteria identified in one fourth of all patients with a bacterial cause. 75% of those cultured were macrolide resistant. Mycoplasma pneumoniae was detected in 0.9% of all patients, while detection of Legionella pneumoniae was 2.8 times higher. Propensity score matching resulted in 250 pairs of patients with balanced covariates. Thirty-day mortality did not differ between groups (21.1% in beta-lactam/azithromycin vs 19.2% in beta-lactam/doxycycline, p = 0.649). A longer duration of azithromycin more than or equal to 3 days did not alter this outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Beta-lactam/azithromycin or beta-lactam/doxycycline are viable empirical treatments for severe community-acquired pneumonia despite local resistance patterns. Our result did not support a longer duration of azithromycin over doxycycline.</p>","PeriodicalId":56117,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmii.2026.07.012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Community-acquired pneumonia constitutes a significant burden to healthcare systems. While international guidelines recommend beta-lactam plus macrolide in treating severe community-acquired pneumonia, doxycycline instead of macrolide provides antimicrobial activity to macrolide-resistant organisms that are highly prevalent in East Asia and avoids its side effects. Yet, doxycycline's immunomodulatory effect is not as well studied. We investigated the comparative efficacy of doxycycline with azithromycin in the treatment of severe community-acquired pneumonia.

Methods: From 1 January 2014 to 31 December 2023, consecutive adult patients with pneumonia or pulmonary sepsis requiring intensive care within 48 h of hospital admission, who received a beta-lactam in combination with either azithromycin or doxycycline were retrospectively reviewed. The two groups were matched by propensity scores and compared for all-cause mortality at day 30.

Results: A total of 670 patients were analysed. Streptococcus pneumoniae was the dominant bacteria identified in one fourth of all patients with a bacterial cause. 75% of those cultured were macrolide resistant. Mycoplasma pneumoniae was detected in 0.9% of all patients, while detection of Legionella pneumoniae was 2.8 times higher. Propensity score matching resulted in 250 pairs of patients with balanced covariates. Thirty-day mortality did not differ between groups (21.1% in beta-lactam/azithromycin vs 19.2% in beta-lactam/doxycycline, p = 0.649). A longer duration of azithromycin more than or equal to 3 days did not alter this outcome.

Conclusions: Beta-lactam/azithromycin or beta-lactam/doxycycline are viable empirical treatments for severe community-acquired pneumonia despite local resistance patterns. Our result did not support a longer duration of azithromycin over doxycycline.

多西环素与阿奇霉素联合治疗重症监护病房社区获得性肺炎的实证研究——回顾性倾向评分匹配队列研究
社区获得性肺炎对卫生保健系统构成重大负担。虽然国际指南推荐β -内酰胺加大环内酯治疗严重社区获得性肺炎,但强力霉素代替大环内酯可为东亚地区高度流行的大环内酯耐药菌提供抗菌活性,并避免其副作用。然而,强力霉素的免疫调节作用尚未得到充分的研究。我们研究了强力霉素与阿奇霉素治疗重症社区获得性肺炎的比较疗效。方法:回顾性分析2014年1月1日至2023年12月31日住院48 h内需要重症监护的连续成人肺炎或肺脓毒症患者,这些患者接受β -内酰胺联合阿奇霉素或多西环素治疗。两组通过倾向评分进行匹配,并比较第30天的全因死亡率。结果:共分析670例患者。在四分之一的细菌性病因患者中,肺炎链球菌是主要细菌。75%的培养菌对大环内酯耐药。肺炎支原体检出率为0.9%,肺炎军团菌检出率为2.8倍。倾向评分匹配得到250对协变量平衡的患者。30天死亡率组间无差异(β -内酰胺/阿奇霉素组21.1% vs β -内酰胺/多西环素组19.2%,p = 0.649)。阿奇霉素持续时间超过或等于3天并不改变这一结果。结论:尽管存在局部耐药模式,但β -内酰胺/阿奇霉素或β -内酰胺/强力霉素是治疗严重社区获得性肺炎的可行经验疗法。我们的结果不支持阿奇霉素比强力霉素的持续时间更长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection
Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection IMMUNOLOGY-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
15.90
自引率
5.40%
发文量
159
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Microbiology Immunology and Infection is an open access journal, committed to disseminating information on the latest trends and advances in microbiology, immunology, infectious diseases and parasitology. Article types considered include perspectives, review articles, original articles, brief reports and correspondence. With the aim of promoting effective and accurate scientific information, an expert panel of referees constitutes the backbone of the peer-review process in evaluating the quality and content of manuscripts submitted for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书