[CHARACTERISTICS OF ASTHMA PATIENTS WITH A FORCED EXPIRATORY VOLUME IN ONE SECOND/FORCED VITAL CAPACITY OF LESS THAN 70% IN A BRONCHODILATOR INHALATION TEST].

Q4 Medicine
Shinobu Osanai, Yoshinori Minami, Takaaki Sasaki
{"title":"[CHARACTERISTICS OF ASTHMA PATIENTS WITH A FORCED EXPIRATORY VOLUME IN ONE SECOND/FORCED VITAL CAPACITY OF LESS THAN 70% IN A BRONCHODILATOR INHALATION TEST].","authors":"Shinobu Osanai, Yoshinori Minami, Takaaki Sasaki","doi":"10.15036/arerugi.75.297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The present study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and bronchodilator inhalation (BDI) responsiveness of asthma patients whose forced expiratory volume in one second to forced vital capacity ratio (FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC) remained below 70% after BDI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational study included 130 patients diagnosed with asthma by respiratory specialists who had undergone airway reversibility test, and whose diagnoses could be confirmed from medical records.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 130 patients, 91 showed a post-BDI FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC ≥70% (N group), while 39 showed a post-BDI FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC <70% (O group). Peripheral blood eosinophil counts were significantly higher in the O group, whereas no other background factors differed between the groups. Before BDI, the percentage predicted FEV<sub>1</sub> (%FEV<sub>1</sub>) and the percentage predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC) were significantly lower in the O group. After BDI, %FEV<sub>1</sub> remained lower in the O group, whereas %FVC did not differ significantly between the two groups. Both the absolute and relative increases in FEV<sub>1</sub> and FVC following BDI were greater in the O group. In the O group, the absolute increases in FEV<sub>1</sub> and FVC were comparable, whereas in the N group, the increase in FVC was smaller than that in FEV<sub>1</sub>. The proportion of patients meeting criteria for airway reversibility (≥10% improvement in either FEV<sub>1</sub> or FVC from predicted values) was significantly higher in the O group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Asthma patients with a post-BDI FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC <70% had more severe obstructive ventilatory impairment; however, their bronchodilator responsiveness was preserved, with a particularly marked improvement in FVC.</p>","PeriodicalId":35521,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Allergology","volume":"75 4","pages":"297-304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Allergology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15036/arerugi.75.297","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The present study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics and bronchodilator inhalation (BDI) responsiveness of asthma patients whose forced expiratory volume in one second to forced vital capacity ratio (FEV1/FVC) remained below 70% after BDI.

Methods: This retrospective observational study included 130 patients diagnosed with asthma by respiratory specialists who had undergone airway reversibility test, and whose diagnoses could be confirmed from medical records.

Results: Among the 130 patients, 91 showed a post-BDI FEV1/FVC ≥70% (N group), while 39 showed a post-BDI FEV1/FVC <70% (O group). Peripheral blood eosinophil counts were significantly higher in the O group, whereas no other background factors differed between the groups. Before BDI, the percentage predicted FEV1 (%FEV1) and the percentage predicted forced vital capacity (%FVC) were significantly lower in the O group. After BDI, %FEV1 remained lower in the O group, whereas %FVC did not differ significantly between the two groups. Both the absolute and relative increases in FEV1 and FVC following BDI were greater in the O group. In the O group, the absolute increases in FEV1 and FVC were comparable, whereas in the N group, the increase in FVC was smaller than that in FEV1. The proportion of patients meeting criteria for airway reversibility (≥10% improvement in either FEV1 or FVC from predicted values) was significantly higher in the O group.

Conclusion: Asthma patients with a post-BDI FEV1/FVC <70% had more severe obstructive ventilatory impairment; however, their bronchodilator responsiveness was preserved, with a particularly marked improvement in FVC.

[支气管扩张剂吸入试验中1秒用力呼气量/用力肺活量小于70%的哮喘患者的特征]。
背景:本研究旨在探讨支气管扩张剂吸入(BDI)后1秒用力呼气量与用力肺活量比(FEV1/FVC)低于70%的哮喘患者的临床特征和支气管扩张剂吸入(BDI)反应性。方法:本回顾性观察研究纳入了130例经呼吸专科医生诊断为哮喘且经气道可逆性试验证实的患者,这些患者的诊断可从病历中得到证实。结果:130例患者中,91例患者bdi后FEV1/FVC≥70% (N组),39例患者bdi后FEV1/FVC 1 (%FEV1)和预测用力肺活量百分比(%FVC)明显低于O组。BDI后,0组FEV1 %仍较低,而两组间FVC %无显著差异。BDI后FEV1和FVC的绝对和相对增加在O组更大。在O组中,FEV1和FVC的绝对增加具有可比性,而在N组中,FVC的增加小于FEV1。O组符合气道可逆性标准(FEV1或FVC较预测值改善≥10%)的患者比例显著高于对照组。结论:bdi后哮喘患者FEV1/FVC
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Japanese Journal of Allergology
Japanese Journal of Allergology Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
期刊介绍: The Japanese Society of Allergology is made up of medical researchers and clinical physicians who share an involvement in the study of allergies and clinical immunology. Clinical subspecialties include such allergies and immune-response disorders as bronchial asthma, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, collagen disease, allergic rhinitis, pollenosis, hives, atopic dermatitis, and immunodeficiency. However, there are many patients afflicted by other allergies as well. The Society considers all such patients and disorders within its purview.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书