Usefulness of custom-made orthoses with 3D scanning and printing for the conservative treatment of rhizarthrosis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Iñigo Cearra Guezuraga, Miguel de la Iglesia García, Borja Cuevas Martínez, Borja Herrero de la Parte, Inigo Gorostiza
{"title":"Usefulness of custom-made orthoses with 3D scanning and printing for the conservative treatment of rhizarthrosis.","authors":"Iñigo Cearra Guezuraga, Miguel de la Iglesia García, Borja Cuevas Martínez, Borja Herrero de la Parte, Inigo Gorostiza","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis (rhizarthrosis) is often managed with orthopedic orthoses that are prefabricated in various sizes and may be manipulated to be adapted to the patient's anatomy. Advances in three-dimensional scanning and printing now allow fabrication of anatomically matched custom-made orthoses.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a 3D-printed orthosis compared with custom-fitted orthoses in the conservative treatment of rhizarthrosis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Feasibility randomized controlled study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-nine patients (42 hands) without prior treatment were randomized into 2 groups: custom-fitted orthoses (n = 21 hands) and 3D-printed orthoses (n = 21 hands). Data on sociodemographic characteristics, pain (measured by visual analog scale), grip and pinch strength (using a dynamometer), and functional outcomes (DASH score) were collected at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months. Treatment adherence and patient satisfaction were also evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pain levels decreased in both groups, with a more pronounced improvement in the 3D-printed group at 1 month (between-group difference -1.14, 95% CI -2.25 to -0.33, p < 0.05). Patients using 3D-printed orthoses also reported higher satisfaction (45.0 ± 6.97 vs 35.5 ± 9.36, p < 0.001). Both groups showed improvements in DASH scores, with greater gains in the 3D-printed group. Treatment adherence also tended to be higher in the 3D-printed group. No significant differences were observed in grip or pinch strength.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>3D-printed orthoses are an effective and promising option for conservative management of rhizarthrosis, with potential benefits in pain relief, patient satisfaction, and adherence compared with conventional custom-fitted orthoses.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000577","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Trapeziometacarpal osteoarthritis (rhizarthrosis) is often managed with orthopedic orthoses that are prefabricated in various sizes and may be manipulated to be adapted to the patient's anatomy. Advances in three-dimensional scanning and printing now allow fabrication of anatomically matched custom-made orthoses.

Objectives: To assess the feasibility and effectiveness of a 3D-printed orthosis compared with custom-fitted orthoses in the conservative treatment of rhizarthrosis.

Study design: Feasibility randomized controlled study.

Methods: Thirty-nine patients (42 hands) without prior treatment were randomized into 2 groups: custom-fitted orthoses (n = 21 hands) and 3D-printed orthoses (n = 21 hands). Data on sociodemographic characteristics, pain (measured by visual analog scale), grip and pinch strength (using a dynamometer), and functional outcomes (DASH score) were collected at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months. Treatment adherence and patient satisfaction were also evaluated.

Results: Pain levels decreased in both groups, with a more pronounced improvement in the 3D-printed group at 1 month (between-group difference -1.14, 95% CI -2.25 to -0.33, p < 0.05). Patients using 3D-printed orthoses also reported higher satisfaction (45.0 ± 6.97 vs 35.5 ± 9.36, p < 0.001). Both groups showed improvements in DASH scores, with greater gains in the 3D-printed group. Treatment adherence also tended to be higher in the 3D-printed group. No significant differences were observed in grip or pinch strength.

Conclusions: 3D-printed orthoses are an effective and promising option for conservative management of rhizarthrosis, with potential benefits in pain relief, patient satisfaction, and adherence compared with conventional custom-fitted orthoses.

3D扫描打印定制矫形器在根瘤病保守治疗中的应用。
背景:斜骨腕骨关节炎(根状关节病)通常使用各种尺寸的预制矫形器进行治疗,并可根据患者的解剖结构进行调整。三维扫描和打印技术的进步现在允许制造与解剖学匹配的定制矫形器。目的:比较3d打印矫形器与定制矫形器在根茎病保守治疗中的可行性和有效性。研究设计:可行性随机对照研究。方法:将未经治疗的39例(42只手)患者随机分为定制矫形器组(n = 21只手)和3d打印矫形器组(n = 21只手)。在基线、1个月和3个月收集社会人口学特征、疼痛(通过视觉模拟量表测量)、握力和捏力(使用测力计)和功能结果(DASH评分)的数据。治疗依从性和患者满意度也进行了评估。结果:两组疼痛水平均有所下降,3d打印组在1个月时的改善更为明显(组间差异为-1.14,95% CI为-2.25 ~ -0.33,p < 0.05)。使用3d打印矫形器的患者满意度也更高(45.0±6.97 vs 35.5±9.36,p < 0.001)。两组的DASH得分都有所提高,3d打印组的得分更高。3d打印组的治疗依从性也更高。在握力或捏力方面没有观察到显著差异。结论:与传统定制矫形器相比,3d打印矫形器在缓解疼痛、患者满意度和依从性方面具有潜在的优势,是一种有效且有希望的保守治疗根瘤病的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书