Determinants of Interest-Holder Perspectives Toward Post-Mortem Tissue Donation in Oncology: A Systematic Review.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Kaatje Goossens, Anaïs Anthierens, Caro Monteny, Catherine Dilewyns, Christine Desmedt, Hans Wildiers, Pascal Borry
{"title":"Determinants of Interest-Holder Perspectives Toward Post-Mortem Tissue Donation in Oncology: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Kaatje Goossens, Anaïs Anthierens, Caro Monteny, Catherine Dilewyns, Christine Desmedt, Hans Wildiers, Pascal Borry","doi":"10.1002/pon.70571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Post-mortem tissue donation (PTD) is increasingly recognised as an important resource for advancing cancer research. Developing effective recruitment strategies for PTD programs requires a thorough understanding of interest-holder perspectives, which remain insufficiently explored. This systematic review examined factors influencing patients' willingness to participate in PTD, next-of-kin's willingness to support their relative's participation, and healthcare professionals willingness to recruit for PTD programs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted on 19 February 2026 to identify original research studies exploring self-reported factors influencing perspectives toward PTD. Study selection, data extraction, and quality appraisal were performed independently by four reviewers. Identified factors were synthesised and categorised into five domains: ethical/existential, emotional, practical, socio-demographic/socio-economic, and disease-related.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies were included from 11,986 records screened. Overall, attitudes toward PTD were generally favourable across interest-holders. Ethical, existential and emotional considerations, particularly altruism, reciprocity and the perceived impact on the patient-clinician relationship were associated with willingness to participate in, (support) consent to, or recruit for PTD. Reported barriers were predominantly practical, including logistical challenges, concerns regarding funeral arrangements, and limited knowledge of PTD procedures. Healthcare professionals additionally identified discomfort with end-of-life discussions and uncertainty about PTD processes as barriers to recruitment. Socio-demographic, socio-economic, and disease-related factors were reported inconsistently, with no clear pattern of association.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interest-holder attitudes toward PTD are primarily shaped by ethical, emotional, and practical considerations. The consistency of findings across interest-holder groups and cancer types supports the development of patient-centred communication strategies to facilitate the implementation of PTD programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":20779,"journal":{"name":"Psycho‐Oncology","volume":"35 8","pages":"e70571"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13453286/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psycho‐Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.70571","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Post-mortem tissue donation (PTD) is increasingly recognised as an important resource for advancing cancer research. Developing effective recruitment strategies for PTD programs requires a thorough understanding of interest-holder perspectives, which remain insufficiently explored. This systematic review examined factors influencing patients' willingness to participate in PTD, next-of-kin's willingness to support their relative's participation, and healthcare professionals willingness to recruit for PTD programs.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted on 19 February 2026 to identify original research studies exploring self-reported factors influencing perspectives toward PTD. Study selection, data extraction, and quality appraisal were performed independently by four reviewers. Identified factors were synthesised and categorised into five domains: ethical/existential, emotional, practical, socio-demographic/socio-economic, and disease-related.

Results: Fourteen studies were included from 11,986 records screened. Overall, attitudes toward PTD were generally favourable across interest-holders. Ethical, existential and emotional considerations, particularly altruism, reciprocity and the perceived impact on the patient-clinician relationship were associated with willingness to participate in, (support) consent to, or recruit for PTD. Reported barriers were predominantly practical, including logistical challenges, concerns regarding funeral arrangements, and limited knowledge of PTD procedures. Healthcare professionals additionally identified discomfort with end-of-life discussions and uncertainty about PTD processes as barriers to recruitment. Socio-demographic, socio-economic, and disease-related factors were reported inconsistently, with no clear pattern of association.

Conclusions: Interest-holder attitudes toward PTD are primarily shaped by ethical, emotional, and practical considerations. The consistency of findings across interest-holder groups and cancer types supports the development of patient-centred communication strategies to facilitate the implementation of PTD programs.

肿瘤组织捐献中利益持有者观点的决定因素:系统综述。
目的:死后组织捐赠(PTD)越来越被认为是推进癌症研究的重要资源。为PTD项目制定有效的招聘策略需要对利益相关者的观点有透彻的了解,这方面的探索还不够充分。本系统综述考察了影响患者参与PTD意愿的因素、亲属支持其亲属参与的意愿以及医疗保健专业人员招募PTD项目的意愿。方法:于2026年2月19日进行了系统的文献检索,以确定探索自我报告的影响PTD观点的因素的原始研究。研究选择、数据提取和质量评价由四位评论者独立完成。已确定的因素被综合并分为五个领域:伦理/存在、情感、实际、社会人口/社会经济和疾病相关。结果:从筛选的11,986份记录中纳入了14项研究。总体而言,所有利益相关者对PTD的态度普遍有利。伦理、存在和情感方面的考虑,特别是利他主义、互惠主义和对医患关系的感知影响与参与、(支持)同意或招募PTD的意愿有关。报告的障碍主要是实际的,包括后勤方面的挑战、对葬礼安排的担忧以及对PTD程序的有限了解。医疗保健专业人员还认为,临终讨论带来的不适和PTD过程的不确定性是招聘的障碍。社会人口、社会经济和疾病相关因素的报告不一致,没有明确的关联模式。结论:利益持有者对PTD的态度主要是由伦理、情感和实际考虑因素决定的。利益相关者群体和癌症类型之间研究结果的一致性支持以患者为中心的沟通策略的发展,以促进PTD项目的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psycho‐Oncology
Psycho‐Oncology 医学-心理学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Psycho-Oncology is concerned with the psychological, social, behavioral, and ethical aspects of cancer. This subspeciality addresses the two major psychological dimensions of cancer: the psychological responses of patients to cancer at all stages of the disease, and that of their families and caretakers; and the psychological, behavioral and social factors that may influence the disease process. Psycho-oncology is an area of multi-disciplinary interest and has boundaries with the major specialities in oncology: the clinical disciplines (surgery, medicine, pediatrics, radiotherapy), epidemiology, immunology, endocrinology, biology, pathology, bioethics, palliative care, rehabilitation medicine, clinical trials research and decision making, as well as psychiatry and psychology. This international journal is published twelve times a year and will consider contributions to research of clinical and theoretical interest. Topics covered are wide-ranging and relate to the psychosocial aspects of cancer and AIDS-related tumors, including: epidemiology, quality of life, palliative and supportive care, psychiatry, psychology, sociology, social work, nursing and educational issues. Special reviews are offered from time to time. There is a section reviewing recently published books. A society news section is available for the dissemination of information relating to meetings, conferences and other society-related topics. Summary proceedings of important national and international symposia falling within the aims of the journal are presented.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书