Inter-device Agreement of Device-Designated Chord Mu and Chord Alpha Measurements in Patients Undergoing Preoperative Cataract Evaluation.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Karanpreet S Multani, Anushka Raj, Liam D Redden, Jascha Wendelstein, Osamah Mian, Achim Langenbucher, Kamran M Riaz
{"title":"Inter-device Agreement of Device-Designated Chord Mu and Chord Alpha Measurements in Patients Undergoing Preoperative Cataract Evaluation.","authors":"Karanpreet S Multani, Anushka Raj, Liam D Redden, Jascha Wendelstein, Osamah Mian, Achim Langenbucher, Kamran M Riaz","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20260622-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate inter-device agreement of device-designated chord mu and chord alpha measurements, defined as device-designated linear displacements between the Purkinje reflex and the pupil center (chord mu) or limbal center (chord alpha), by four common devices: IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG), Lenstar 900 (Haag-Streit), iTrace (Tracey Technologies), and Pentacam (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients undergoing preoperative cataract evaluation at a tertiary academic center. Eyes with measurements from all four devices between 2020 and 2023 were included. Exclusion criteria included prior ocular trauma, surgery, or pathology affecting imaging. Chord mu and alpha were analyzed using bivariate methods, including centroid direction and inter-device comparisons. Biometry and corneal curvature were also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 110 eyes from 77 patients (mean age: 63 ± 11 years) were included. Across devices, mean chord mu values were approximately 0.35 ± 0.20 mm and mean chord alpha values were approximately 0.45 ± 0.23 mm, with substantial variability in both magnitude and orientation. Most pairwise inter-device comparisons demonstrated statistically significant differences for both chord mu and chord alpha. The IOLMaster 700 consistently demonstrated temporal centroid displacement and the widest directional dispersion, whereas other devices showed predominantly nasal centroid orientation. Left and right eyes demonstrated similar patterns but were analyzed separately.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinically relevant inter-device differences in magnitude and orientation of chord mu and chord alpha were observed, with systematic centroid shifts and directional dispersion. These device-specific offsets indicate that such measurements are not interchangeable across platforms and should be interpreted in the context of the measuring device when applied to surgical planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"42 8","pages":"e787-e796"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20260622-01","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate inter-device agreement of device-designated chord mu and chord alpha measurements, defined as device-designated linear displacements between the Purkinje reflex and the pupil center (chord mu) or limbal center (chord alpha), by four common devices: IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG), Lenstar 900 (Haag-Streit), iTrace (Tracey Technologies), and Pentacam (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH).

Methods: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients undergoing preoperative cataract evaluation at a tertiary academic center. Eyes with measurements from all four devices between 2020 and 2023 were included. Exclusion criteria included prior ocular trauma, surgery, or pathology affecting imaging. Chord mu and alpha were analyzed using bivariate methods, including centroid direction and inter-device comparisons. Biometry and corneal curvature were also analyzed.

Results: A total of 110 eyes from 77 patients (mean age: 63 ± 11 years) were included. Across devices, mean chord mu values were approximately 0.35 ± 0.20 mm and mean chord alpha values were approximately 0.45 ± 0.23 mm, with substantial variability in both magnitude and orientation. Most pairwise inter-device comparisons demonstrated statistically significant differences for both chord mu and chord alpha. The IOLMaster 700 consistently demonstrated temporal centroid displacement and the widest directional dispersion, whereas other devices showed predominantly nasal centroid orientation. Left and right eyes demonstrated similar patterns but were analyzed separately.

Conclusions: Clinically relevant inter-device differences in magnitude and orientation of chord mu and chord alpha were observed, with systematic centroid shifts and directional dispersion. These device-specific offsets indicate that such measurements are not interchangeable across platforms and should be interpreted in the context of the measuring device when applied to surgical planning.

术前白内障评估中器械指定弦Mu和弦Alpha测量的设备间一致性。
目的:通过四种常见设备:IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG)、Lenstar 900 (Haag-Streit)、iTrace (Tracey Technologies)和Pentacam (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH),评估设备指定弦mu和弦alpha测量的设备间一致性,定义为浦肯脑反射与瞳孔中心(弦mu)或边缘中心(弦alpha)之间的设备指定线性位移。方法:对在某三级学术中心接受术前白内障评估的患者进行回顾性横断面研究。在2020年至2023年期间,所有四种设备都测量了眼睛。排除标准包括既往眼外伤、手术或影响影像学的病理。Chord mu和alpha采用双变量方法进行分析,包括质心方向和设备间比较。生物测量和角膜曲率也进行了分析。结果:共纳入77例患者110只眼,平均年龄63±11岁。在所有设备中,平均弦mu值约为0.35±0.20 mm,平均弦alpha值约为0.45±0.23 mm,在大小和方向上都有很大的变化。大多数两两设备间比较显示,弦mu和弦alpha的差异具有统计学意义。IOLMaster 700始终表现出颞形质心位移和最宽的定向弥散,而其他设备主要表现为鼻形质心定向。左眼和右眼表现出相似的模式,但分开分析。结论:观察到与临床相关的mu弦和alpha弦的大小和方向的装置间差异,有系统的质心移位和方向性弥散。这些特定于器械的偏移量表明,这些测量值在不同的平台上是不可互换的,当应用于手术计划时,应该在测量装置的背景下进行解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书