Oral Riboflavin for Sunlight-Induced Corneal Cross-linking: Efficacy Assessment in a Rabbit Model In Vivo Using Extensometry and OCT Elastography.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Emilio A Torres-Netto, M Enes Aydemir, Nan-Ji Lu, Sabine Kling, Nikki Hafezi, Mark Hillen, Michalina L Depczynska, Farhad Hafezi
{"title":"Oral Riboflavin for Sunlight-Induced Corneal Cross-linking: Efficacy Assessment in a Rabbit Model In Vivo Using Extensometry and OCT Elastography.","authors":"Emilio A Torres-Netto, M Enes Aydemir, Nan-Ji Lu, Sabine Kling, Nikki Hafezi, Mark Hillen, Michalina L Depczynska, Farhad Hafezi","doi":"10.3928/1081597X-20260622-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate whether a non-invasive approach to treat keratoconus with corneal cross-linking (CXL) using oral riboflavin and natural sunlight could represent a cost-effective alternative.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a prospective, controlled study, 16 male New Zealand White rabbits (32 eyes) underwent a two-step protocol. Step 1 quantified stromal riboflavin in 4 rabbits (8 eyes) after 14 days of oral riboflavin (6 mg/kg/day). Step 2 randomized the remaining 12 rabbits (24 eyes) 1:1 to oral riboflavin plus natural sunlight or sunlight alone. After a 2,700 klux·h cumulative sunlight dose, corneal biomechanics were assessed by optical coherence tomography elastography and uniaxial stress-strain extensometry.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean stromal riboflavin concentration after oral administration was 0.000081% ± 0.000011%. Stress-strain testing showed no significant differences in stress at 0.1 strain (152 ± 11.5 kPa in controls vs 146 ± 7.0 kPa in treated eyes; <i>P</i> = .57) or mean elastic modulus between 0.1 and 0.2 strain (4.1 vs 4.0 MPa; <i>P</i> = .870). OCT elastography demonstrated significantly higher posterior corneal strain in treated eyes (0.551‰ vs 0.398‰; <i>P</i> = .039), consistent with reduced apparent stiffness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oral riboflavin combined with ambient sunlight did not induce corneal stiffening under the tested conditions. Stromal riboflavin levels were nearly 500-fold lower than those achieved with standard CXL, indicating the tested approach is unlikely to serve as an effective standalone cross-linking strategy. The observed posterior corneal stiffness reduction may reflect ultraviolet-A-induced stromal degradation or subthreshold photochemical effects rather than true cross-linking.</p>","PeriodicalId":16951,"journal":{"name":"Journal of refractive surgery","volume":"42 8","pages":"e797-e803"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of refractive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20260622-02","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate whether a non-invasive approach to treat keratoconus with corneal cross-linking (CXL) using oral riboflavin and natural sunlight could represent a cost-effective alternative.

Methods: In a prospective, controlled study, 16 male New Zealand White rabbits (32 eyes) underwent a two-step protocol. Step 1 quantified stromal riboflavin in 4 rabbits (8 eyes) after 14 days of oral riboflavin (6 mg/kg/day). Step 2 randomized the remaining 12 rabbits (24 eyes) 1:1 to oral riboflavin plus natural sunlight or sunlight alone. After a 2,700 klux·h cumulative sunlight dose, corneal biomechanics were assessed by optical coherence tomography elastography and uniaxial stress-strain extensometry.

Results: The mean stromal riboflavin concentration after oral administration was 0.000081% ± 0.000011%. Stress-strain testing showed no significant differences in stress at 0.1 strain (152 ± 11.5 kPa in controls vs 146 ± 7.0 kPa in treated eyes; P = .57) or mean elastic modulus between 0.1 and 0.2 strain (4.1 vs 4.0 MPa; P = .870). OCT elastography demonstrated significantly higher posterior corneal strain in treated eyes (0.551‰ vs 0.398‰; P = .039), consistent with reduced apparent stiffness.

Conclusions: Oral riboflavin combined with ambient sunlight did not induce corneal stiffening under the tested conditions. Stromal riboflavin levels were nearly 500-fold lower than those achieved with standard CXL, indicating the tested approach is unlikely to serve as an effective standalone cross-linking strategy. The observed posterior corneal stiffness reduction may reflect ultraviolet-A-induced stromal degradation or subthreshold photochemical effects rather than true cross-linking.

口服核黄素用于日光诱导角膜交联:用伸展术和OCT弹性成像评估兔体内模型的疗效。
目的:评估使用口服核黄素和自然阳光进行角膜交联(CXL)治疗圆锥角膜的非侵入性方法是否具有成本效益。方法:在一项前瞻性对照研究中,16只雄性新西兰白兔(32只眼睛)接受了两步方案。步骤1在口服核黄素(6 mg/kg/天)14天后,定量测定4只兔(8只眼)的间质核黄素。第二步,将剩余的12只兔子(24只眼)按1:1随机分为核黄素加自然光照或单独光照两组。累计照射2,700 klux·h后,通过光学相干断层成像弹性成像和单轴应力-应变拉伸测量评估角膜生物力学。结果:口服后平均间质核黄素浓度为0.000081%±0.000011%。应力应变测试显示,0.1应变下的应力(对照组152±11.5 kPa vs治疗组146±7.0 kPa, P = 0.57)或0.1和0.2应变下的平均弹性模量(4.1 vs 4.0 MPa, P = 0.870)无显著差异。OCT弹性成像显示,治疗后角膜应变明显升高(0.551‰vs 0.398‰;P = 0.039),与视僵硬度降低一致。结论:在实验条件下,口服核黄素联合环境光照不会引起角膜硬化。基质核黄素水平比标准CXL低近500倍,表明所测试的方法不太可能作为有效的单独交联策略。观察到的后角膜硬度降低可能反映了紫外线a诱导的基质降解或阈下光化学效应,而不是真正的交联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Refractive Surgery, the official journal of the International Society of Refractive Surgery, a partner of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, has been a monthly peer-reviewed forum for original research, review, and evaluation of refractive and lens-based surgical procedures for more than 30 years. Practical, clinically valuable articles provide readers with the most up-to-date information regarding advances in the field of refractive surgery. Begin to explore the Journal and all of its great benefits such as: • Columns including “Translational Science,” “Surgical Techniques,” and “Biomechanics” • Supplemental videos and materials available for many articles • Access to current articles, as well as several years of archived content • Articles posted online just 2 months after acceptance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书