Safety and Efficacy of Colchicine for the Treatment of Pericarditis in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Khaznah Saad A Alshammari, Sasha Pierre-Paul, Liriany Pimentel, Brittany Weber, Leo Buckley
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Colchicine for the Treatment of Pericarditis in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease.","authors":"Khaznah Saad A Alshammari, Sasha Pierre-Paul, Liriany Pimentel, Brittany Weber, Leo Buckley","doi":"10.1097/FJC.0000000000001866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This retrospective multicenter cohort study compared the safety and efficacy of low- versus high-dose colchicine in adult patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) treated for pericarditis between August 2015 and August 2024. CKD was identified using ICD codes and confirmed by an age- and sex-adjusted estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Patients with recurrent pericarditis or prior colchicine use before admission were excluded. Patients were categorized as receiving high-dose (≥0.6 mg/day) or low-dose (<0.6 mg/day) colchicine. The primary outcomes were colchicine-related adverse effects and a composite of dose reduction or discontinuation. Secondary outcomes included symptom improvement within 72 hours, recurrent pericarditis, and pericardial tamponade within 12 months. A total of 93 patients were included (53 high-dose and 40 low-dose). Idiopathic pericarditis was the most common etiology in both groups. End-stage kidney disease (57.5% vs. 15%) and dialysis (52.5% vs. 13%) were more common in the low-dose group. High-dose colchicine was associated with more gastrointestinal adverse events (39.6% vs. 12.5%, p=0.004), a higher rate of the composite outcome of dose reduction or discontinuation (41.5% vs. 20%, p=0.043), and more frequent dose reduction alone (30.2% vs. 7.5%, p=0.009), while discontinuation rates were similar. Symptom relief, recurrent pericarditis, and pericardial tamponade were comparable between groups. Initial colchicine doses of less than 0.6 mg daily were associated with improved tolerability in patients with CKD and pericarditis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FJC.0000000000001866","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This retrospective multicenter cohort study compared the safety and efficacy of low- versus high-dose colchicine in adult patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) treated for pericarditis between August 2015 and August 2024. CKD was identified using ICD codes and confirmed by an age- and sex-adjusted estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Patients with recurrent pericarditis or prior colchicine use before admission were excluded. Patients were categorized as receiving high-dose (≥0.6 mg/day) or low-dose (<0.6 mg/day) colchicine. The primary outcomes were colchicine-related adverse effects and a composite of dose reduction or discontinuation. Secondary outcomes included symptom improvement within 72 hours, recurrent pericarditis, and pericardial tamponade within 12 months. A total of 93 patients were included (53 high-dose and 40 low-dose). Idiopathic pericarditis was the most common etiology in both groups. End-stage kidney disease (57.5% vs. 15%) and dialysis (52.5% vs. 13%) were more common in the low-dose group. High-dose colchicine was associated with more gastrointestinal adverse events (39.6% vs. 12.5%, p=0.004), a higher rate of the composite outcome of dose reduction or discontinuation (41.5% vs. 20%, p=0.043), and more frequent dose reduction alone (30.2% vs. 7.5%, p=0.009), while discontinuation rates were similar. Symptom relief, recurrent pericarditis, and pericardial tamponade were comparable between groups. Initial colchicine doses of less than 0.6 mg daily were associated with improved tolerability in patients with CKD and pericarditis.

秋水仙碱治疗慢性肾病心包炎的安全性和有效性。
这项回顾性多中心队列研究比较了2015年8月至2024年8月期间,秋水仙碱低剂量与高剂量在慢性肾脏病(CKD)心包炎治疗的成年患者中的安全性和有效性。使用ICD代码识别CKD,并通过年龄和性别调整的估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)来确认。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
367
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology is a peer reviewed, multidisciplinary journal that publishes original articles and pertinent review articles on basic and clinical aspects of cardiovascular pharmacology. The Journal encourages submission in all aspects of cardiovascular pharmacology/medicine including, but not limited to: stroke, kidney disease, lipid disorders, diabetes, systemic and pulmonary hypertension, cancer angiogenesis, neural and hormonal control of the circulation, sepsis, neurodegenerative diseases with a vascular component, cardiac and vascular remodeling, heart failure, angina, anticoagulants/antiplatelet agents, drugs/agents that affect vascular smooth muscle, and arrhythmias. Appropriate subjects include new drug development and evaluation, physiological and pharmacological bases of drug action, metabolism, drug interactions and side effects, application of drugs to gain novel insights into physiology or pathological conditions, clinical results with new and established agents, and novel methods. The focus is on pharmacology in its broadest applications, incorporating not only traditional approaches, but new approaches to the development of pharmacological agents and the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. Please note that JCVP does not publish work based on biological extracts of mixed and uncertain chemical composition or unknown concentration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书