Cuspal Deflection and Marginal Adaptation in Premolars Restored with Low-Shrinkage Resin Composites.

IF 2.2 Q1 Dentistry
Seda Gömleksiz
{"title":"Cuspal Deflection and Marginal Adaptation in Premolars Restored with Low-Shrinkage Resin Composites.","authors":"Seda Gömleksiz","doi":"10.1055/s-0046-1825875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate cuspal deflection and marginal adaptation in premolars restored with conventional and low-shrinkage resin composites (RCs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty-six maxillary first premolars with standardized MOD cavities were randomly assigned to four groups (<i>n</i> = 14): Clearfil Majesty Posterior (CMP), Charisma Diamond (CHD), Beautifil II LS (BL), and Filtek Z550 (FZ). Cuspal deflection was measured using a digital micrometer as the linear distance between two reference points at baseline, 5 minutes, and 24 hours after restoration. Deflection values were calculated relative to the baseline. Three samples per group were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy to assess marginal adaptation.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics V23.0. Data distribution was evaluated using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Kruskal-Wallis and one-way ANOVA tests were used according to data distribution, followed by appropriate post hoc tests. The significance level was set at <i>p</i> < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The amount of cuspal deflection at 5 minutes was greater than that observed at 24 hours in all groups. CMP, CHD, and BL showed lower cuspal deflection compared with FZ at all time intervals (<i>p</i> < 0.001). CMP exhibited the lowest cuspal deflection values, although no significant differences were found among the low-shrinkage RCs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Modifications in the organic matrix or material formulation of the RCs can contribute positively to the control of cuspal deflection and support improved marginal adaptation. The reduced cuspal movement produced by low-shrinkage RCs may increase the likelihood of clinical success by helping preserve restoration integrity.</p>","PeriodicalId":12028,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0046-1825875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate cuspal deflection and marginal adaptation in premolars restored with conventional and low-shrinkage resin composites (RCs).

Materials and methods: Fifty-six maxillary first premolars with standardized MOD cavities were randomly assigned to four groups (n = 14): Clearfil Majesty Posterior (CMP), Charisma Diamond (CHD), Beautifil II LS (BL), and Filtek Z550 (FZ). Cuspal deflection was measured using a digital micrometer as the linear distance between two reference points at baseline, 5 minutes, and 24 hours after restoration. Deflection values were calculated relative to the baseline. Three samples per group were evaluated using scanning electron microscopy to assess marginal adaptation.

Statistical analysis: Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics V23.0. Data distribution was evaluated using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Kruskal-Wallis and one-way ANOVA tests were used according to data distribution, followed by appropriate post hoc tests. The significance level was set at p < 0.05.

Results: The amount of cuspal deflection at 5 minutes was greater than that observed at 24 hours in all groups. CMP, CHD, and BL showed lower cuspal deflection compared with FZ at all time intervals (p < 0.001). CMP exhibited the lowest cuspal deflection values, although no significant differences were found among the low-shrinkage RCs.

Conclusion: Modifications in the organic matrix or material formulation of the RCs can contribute positively to the control of cuspal deflection and support improved marginal adaptation. The reduced cuspal movement produced by low-shrinkage RCs may increase the likelihood of clinical success by helping preserve restoration integrity.

低收缩树脂复合材料修复前磨牙牙尖偏转与边缘自适应。
目的:本体外研究的目的是评估传统和低收缩树脂复合材料(RCs)修复前磨牙的尖偏转和边缘适应。材料与方法:将56颗具有标准MOD牙槽的上颌第一前磨牙随机分为4组(n = 14): Clearfil Majesty Posterior (CMP)、Charisma Diamond (CHD)、Beautifil II LS (BL)和Filtek Z550 (FZ)。使用数字千分尺作为基线、5分钟和24小时后两个参考点之间的线性距离来测量尖挠度。相对于基线计算挠度值。使用扫描电子显微镜对每组三个样本进行评估,以评估边际适应性。统计分析:使用IBM SPSS Statistics V23.0对数据进行分析。使用Shapiro-Wilk检验评估数据分布。根据数据分布情况采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和单因素方差分析,随后进行适当的事后检验。结果:各组患者5分钟尖偏转量均大于24小时尖偏转量。与FZ相比,CMP、CHD和BL在所有时间间隔内均表现出较低的尖挠度(p)。结论:改变RCs的有机基质或材料配方对控制尖挠度和支持改善边缘适应有积极作用。低收缩RCs产生的尖部运动减少有助于保持修复体的完整性,从而增加临床成功的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Dentistry
European Journal of Dentistry Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
161
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Dentistry is the official journal of the Dental Investigations Society, based in Turkey. It is a double-blinded peer-reviewed, Open Access, multi-disciplinary international journal addressing various aspects of dentistry. The journal''s board consists of eminent investigators in dentistry from across the globe and presents an ideal international composition. The journal encourages its authors to submit original investigations, reviews, and reports addressing various divisions of dentistry including oral pathology, prosthodontics, endodontics, orthodontics etc. It is available both online and in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书