Mario Troisi, Salvatore Troisi, Luisa Costa, Piero Ruscitti, Francesco Maione, Ciro Costagliola, Roberto Giacomelli, Luca Cantarini, Claudia Fabiani, Francesco Caso
{"title":"IL-17 at the eye-joint interface in psoriatic disease: mechanisms, clinical correlates, and therapeutic implications.","authors":"Mario Troisi, Salvatore Troisi, Luisa Costa, Piero Ruscitti, Francesco Maione, Ciro Costagliola, Roberto Giacomelli, Luca Cantarini, Claudia Fabiani, Francesco Caso","doi":"10.1080/1744666X.2026.2712644","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an immune-mediated inflammatory disease in which the IL-23/Th17/IL-17 axis contributes to musculoskeletal and extra-musculoskeletal inflammation. Ocular manifestations, particularly dry eye disease (DED), uveitis, and less frequently episcleritis and scleritis, are increasingly recognized across psoriatic disease, although their pathobiology and relationship to systemic inflammatory pathways remain incompletely defined.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This narrative review examines evidence linking IL-17 to ocular disease in psoriatic disease, with emphasis on ocular surface inflammation. We summarize ocular involvement in PsA, review mechanistic and translational data across skin, enthesis, synovium, and the lacrimal-ocular surface unit, and appraise clinical data on IL-17-pathway inhibitors, including their established musculoskeletal and cutaneous efficacy and less consistent ocular effects.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>IL-17 may contribute to ocular surface inflammation in PsA, but this remains largely inferential because direct PsA-specific ocular data are scarce. IL-17A inhibitors are effective in musculoskeletal and cutaneous disease, yet ocular benefit cannot be assumed from systemic efficacy. Current evidence suggests limited impact on established DED and less consistent uveitis protection than monoclonal TNF inhibition. Prospective studies with adjudicated ocular endpoints and tear/conjunctival profiling are needed to define whether IL-17-responsive ocular phenotypes exist in PsA.</p>","PeriodicalId":12175,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","volume":" ","pages":"883-899"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1744666X.2026.2712644","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an immune-mediated inflammatory disease in which the IL-23/Th17/IL-17 axis contributes to musculoskeletal and extra-musculoskeletal inflammation. Ocular manifestations, particularly dry eye disease (DED), uveitis, and less frequently episcleritis and scleritis, are increasingly recognized across psoriatic disease, although their pathobiology and relationship to systemic inflammatory pathways remain incompletely defined.
Areas covered: This narrative review examines evidence linking IL-17 to ocular disease in psoriatic disease, with emphasis on ocular surface inflammation. We summarize ocular involvement in PsA, review mechanistic and translational data across skin, enthesis, synovium, and the lacrimal-ocular surface unit, and appraise clinical data on IL-17-pathway inhibitors, including their established musculoskeletal and cutaneous efficacy and less consistent ocular effects.
Expert opinion: IL-17 may contribute to ocular surface inflammation in PsA, but this remains largely inferential because direct PsA-specific ocular data are scarce. IL-17A inhibitors are effective in musculoskeletal and cutaneous disease, yet ocular benefit cannot be assumed from systemic efficacy. Current evidence suggests limited impact on established DED and less consistent uveitis protection than monoclonal TNF inhibition. Prospective studies with adjudicated ocular endpoints and tear/conjunctival profiling are needed to define whether IL-17-responsive ocular phenotypes exist in PsA.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Clinical Immunology (ISSN 1744-666X) provides expert analysis and commentary regarding the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic modalities in clinical immunology. Members of the International Editorial Advisory Panel of Expert Review of Clinical Immunology are the forefront of their area of expertise. This panel works with our dedicated editorial team to identify the most important and topical review themes and the corresponding expert(s) most appropriate to provide commentary and analysis. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the finished reviews provide an essential contribution to decision-making in clinical immunology.
Articles focus on the following key areas:
• Therapeutic overviews of specific immunologic disorders highlighting optimal therapy and prospects for new medicines
• Performance and benefits of newly approved therapeutic agents
• New diagnostic approaches
• Screening and patient stratification
• Pharmacoeconomic studies
• New therapeutic indications for existing therapies
• Adverse effects, occurrence and reduction
• Prospects for medicines in late-stage trials approaching regulatory approval
• Novel treatment strategies
• Epidemiological studies
• Commentary and comparison of treatment guidelines
Topics include infection and immunity, inflammation, host defense mechanisms, congenital and acquired immunodeficiencies, anaphylaxis and allergy, systemic immune diseases, organ-specific inflammatory diseases, transplantation immunology, endocrinology and diabetes, cancer immunology, neuroimmunology and hematological diseases.