Superior Cardiorenal Protection With Tirzepatide Over Dulaglutide in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Large-Scale Propensity Score–Matched Real-World Analysis

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Ibrahim Khalil, Md. Imran Hossain, Mst. Mahmuda Akter, Ferdous Wahid, Aizaz Anwar Khalid, Sunjida Amin Promi, Md. Abu Sayed, Mohd Turzo Rahman, Pallab Sarker
{"title":"Superior Cardiorenal Protection With Tirzepatide Over Dulaglutide in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Large-Scale Propensity Score–Matched Real-World Analysis","authors":"Ibrahim Khalil,&nbsp;Md. Imran Hossain,&nbsp;Mst. Mahmuda Akter,&nbsp;Ferdous Wahid,&nbsp;Aizaz Anwar Khalid,&nbsp;Sunjida Amin Promi,&nbsp;Md. Abu Sayed,&nbsp;Mohd Turzo Rahman,&nbsp;Pallab Sarker","doi":"10.1002/clc.70441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>No direct head-to-head trials compare tirzepatide and dulaglutide in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), though tirzepatide shows superior weight loss and potential cardiovascular benefits in recent trials like SURPASS-CVOT.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study used de-identified electronic health records from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network (as of December 2025). Adults ≥ 18 years with HFpEF (ICD-10: I50.3) initiating tirzepatide (<i>n</i> = 35 174) or dulaglutide (<i>n</i> = 52 999), without prior exposure to the comparator, were identified. One-to-one greedy nearest-neighbor matching (caliper 0.1) on demographics, comorbidities, medications, and laboratory/echocardiographic data produced balanced cohorts of 24 305 patients each. Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated 1-year and 3-year risks of all-cause mortality, acute heart failure events, all-cause hospitalization, myocardial infarction, stroke, atrial fibrillation, MACE, MAKE, acute pancreatitis, and hypoglycemia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Post-matching, cohorts were well-balanced. Tirzepatide linked to lower 1-year risks of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: [0.59–0.74]), all-cause hospitalization (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: [0.82–0.88]), stroke (HR: 0.92, 95% CI: [0.87–0.97]), MACE (HR: 0.89, 95% [CI: 0.84–0.93]), MAKE (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: [0.79–0.91]), and acute pancreatitis (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: [0.63–0.96]). Benefits amplified at 3 years, especially mortality (HR: 0.60, [0.55–0.65]). Tirzepatide showed slightly higher 1-year atrial fibrillation risk (HR: 1.04, [1.00–1.07]). No differences in myocardial infarction or hypoglycemia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In this large real-world propensity-matched analysis, tirzepatide demonstrated superior reductions in mortality, hospitalizations, and cardiorenal outcomes versus dulaglutide in HFpEF patients, with a favorable safety profile.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"49 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13455117/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.70441","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

No direct head-to-head trials compare tirzepatide and dulaglutide in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), though tirzepatide shows superior weight loss and potential cardiovascular benefits in recent trials like SURPASS-CVOT.

Methods

This retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study used de-identified electronic health records from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network (as of December 2025). Adults ≥ 18 years with HFpEF (ICD-10: I50.3) initiating tirzepatide (n = 35 174) or dulaglutide (n = 52 999), without prior exposure to the comparator, were identified. One-to-one greedy nearest-neighbor matching (caliper 0.1) on demographics, comorbidities, medications, and laboratory/echocardiographic data produced balanced cohorts of 24 305 patients each. Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated 1-year and 3-year risks of all-cause mortality, acute heart failure events, all-cause hospitalization, myocardial infarction, stroke, atrial fibrillation, MACE, MAKE, acute pancreatitis, and hypoglycemia.

Results

Post-matching, cohorts were well-balanced. Tirzepatide linked to lower 1-year risks of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: [0.59–0.74]), all-cause hospitalization (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: [0.82–0.88]), stroke (HR: 0.92, 95% CI: [0.87–0.97]), MACE (HR: 0.89, 95% [CI: 0.84–0.93]), MAKE (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: [0.79–0.91]), and acute pancreatitis (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: [0.63–0.96]). Benefits amplified at 3 years, especially mortality (HR: 0.60, [0.55–0.65]). Tirzepatide showed slightly higher 1-year atrial fibrillation risk (HR: 1.04, [1.00–1.07]). No differences in myocardial infarction or hypoglycemia.

Conclusions

In this large real-world propensity-matched analysis, tirzepatide demonstrated superior reductions in mortality, hospitalizations, and cardiorenal outcomes versus dulaglutide in HFpEF patients, with a favorable safety profile.

替西帕肽优于杜拉鲁肽对保留射血分数的心力衰竭的心脏肾脏保护作用:一项大规模倾向评分匹配的现实世界分析。
背景:虽然在最近的surpasscvot等试验中,替西帕肽显示出更好的减肥效果和潜在的心血管益处,但没有直接的头对头试验比较替西帕肽和杜拉鲁肽在保留射血分数(HFpEF)的心力衰竭中的疗效。方法:这项回顾性、倾向评分匹配的队列研究使用了来自TriNetX美国协作网络(截至2025年12月)的去识别电子健康记录。研究发现,18岁以上成人HFpEF (ICD-10: I50.3)患者在未接触比较药物的情况下,开始使用替西帕肽(n = 35 174)或杜拉鲁肽(n = 52 999)。对人口统计学、合并症、药物治疗和实验室/超声心动图数据进行一对一贪婪最近邻匹配(卡尺0.1),产生了每组24305例患者的平衡队列。Kaplan-Meier和Cox比例风险模型评估了1年和3年全因死亡率、急性心力衰竭事件、全因住院、心肌梗死、卒中、心房颤动、MACE、MAKE、急性胰腺炎和低血糖的风险。结果:配对后,队列平衡良好。替西帕肽与1年全因死亡率(HR: 0.66, 95% CI:[0.59-0.74])、全因住院(HR: 0.85, 95% CI:[0.82-0.88])、中风(HR: 0.92, 95% CI:[0.87-0.97])、MACE (HR: 0.89, 95% [CI: 0.84-0.93])、MAKE (HR: 0.85, 95% CI:[0.79-0.91])和急性胰腺炎(HR: 0.78, 95% CI:[0.63-0.96])相关。获益在3年后扩大,尤其是死亡率(HR: 0.60,[0.55-0.65])。替西帕肽1年房颤风险略高(HR: 1.04,[1.00-1.07])。心肌梗死和低血糖无差异。结论:在这项大型的现实世界倾向匹配分析中,替西帕肽在HFpEF患者的死亡率、住院率和心肾预后方面优于dulaglutide,并具有良好的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Cardiology
Clinical Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
189
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Cardiology provides a fully Gold Open Access forum for the publication of original clinical research, as well as brief reviews of diagnostic and therapeutic issues in cardiovascular medicine and cardiovascular surgery. The journal includes Clinical Investigations, Reviews, free standing editorials and commentaries, and bonus online-only content. The journal also publishes supplements, Expert Panel Discussions, sponsored clinical Reviews, Trial Designs, and Quality and Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书