Superior Cardiorenal Protection With Tirzepatide Over Dulaglutide in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Large-Scale Propensity Score–Matched Real-World Analysis
Ibrahim Khalil, Md. Imran Hossain, Mst. Mahmuda Akter, Ferdous Wahid, Aizaz Anwar Khalid, Sunjida Amin Promi, Md. Abu Sayed, Mohd Turzo Rahman, Pallab Sarker
{"title":"Superior Cardiorenal Protection With Tirzepatide Over Dulaglutide in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Large-Scale Propensity Score–Matched Real-World Analysis","authors":"Ibrahim Khalil, Md. Imran Hossain, Mst. Mahmuda Akter, Ferdous Wahid, Aizaz Anwar Khalid, Sunjida Amin Promi, Md. Abu Sayed, Mohd Turzo Rahman, Pallab Sarker","doi":"10.1002/clc.70441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>No direct head-to-head trials compare tirzepatide and dulaglutide in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), though tirzepatide shows superior weight loss and potential cardiovascular benefits in recent trials like SURPASS-CVOT.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study used de-identified electronic health records from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network (as of December 2025). Adults ≥ 18 years with HFpEF (ICD-10: I50.3) initiating tirzepatide (<i>n</i> = 35 174) or dulaglutide (<i>n</i> = 52 999), without prior exposure to the comparator, were identified. One-to-one greedy nearest-neighbor matching (caliper 0.1) on demographics, comorbidities, medications, and laboratory/echocardiographic data produced balanced cohorts of 24 305 patients each. Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated 1-year and 3-year risks of all-cause mortality, acute heart failure events, all-cause hospitalization, myocardial infarction, stroke, atrial fibrillation, MACE, MAKE, acute pancreatitis, and hypoglycemia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Post-matching, cohorts were well-balanced. Tirzepatide linked to lower 1-year risks of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: [0.59–0.74]), all-cause hospitalization (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: [0.82–0.88]), stroke (HR: 0.92, 95% CI: [0.87–0.97]), MACE (HR: 0.89, 95% [CI: 0.84–0.93]), MAKE (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: [0.79–0.91]), and acute pancreatitis (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: [0.63–0.96]). Benefits amplified at 3 years, especially mortality (HR: 0.60, [0.55–0.65]). Tirzepatide showed slightly higher 1-year atrial fibrillation risk (HR: 1.04, [1.00–1.07]). No differences in myocardial infarction or hypoglycemia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In this large real-world propensity-matched analysis, tirzepatide demonstrated superior reductions in mortality, hospitalizations, and cardiorenal outcomes versus dulaglutide in HFpEF patients, with a favorable safety profile.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"49 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13455117/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.70441","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
No direct head-to-head trials compare tirzepatide and dulaglutide in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), though tirzepatide shows superior weight loss and potential cardiovascular benefits in recent trials like SURPASS-CVOT.
Methods
This retrospective, propensity score-matched cohort study used de-identified electronic health records from the TriNetX US Collaborative Network (as of December 2025). Adults ≥ 18 years with HFpEF (ICD-10: I50.3) initiating tirzepatide (n = 35 174) or dulaglutide (n = 52 999), without prior exposure to the comparator, were identified. One-to-one greedy nearest-neighbor matching (caliper 0.1) on demographics, comorbidities, medications, and laboratory/echocardiographic data produced balanced cohorts of 24 305 patients each. Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated 1-year and 3-year risks of all-cause mortality, acute heart failure events, all-cause hospitalization, myocardial infarction, stroke, atrial fibrillation, MACE, MAKE, acute pancreatitis, and hypoglycemia.
Results
Post-matching, cohorts were well-balanced. Tirzepatide linked to lower 1-year risks of all-cause mortality (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: [0.59–0.74]), all-cause hospitalization (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: [0.82–0.88]), stroke (HR: 0.92, 95% CI: [0.87–0.97]), MACE (HR: 0.89, 95% [CI: 0.84–0.93]), MAKE (HR: 0.85, 95% CI: [0.79–0.91]), and acute pancreatitis (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: [0.63–0.96]). Benefits amplified at 3 years, especially mortality (HR: 0.60, [0.55–0.65]). Tirzepatide showed slightly higher 1-year atrial fibrillation risk (HR: 1.04, [1.00–1.07]). No differences in myocardial infarction or hypoglycemia.
Conclusions
In this large real-world propensity-matched analysis, tirzepatide demonstrated superior reductions in mortality, hospitalizations, and cardiorenal outcomes versus dulaglutide in HFpEF patients, with a favorable safety profile.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Cardiology provides a fully Gold Open Access forum for the publication of original clinical research, as well as brief reviews of diagnostic and therapeutic issues in cardiovascular medicine and cardiovascular surgery.
The journal includes Clinical Investigations, Reviews, free standing editorials and commentaries, and bonus online-only content.
The journal also publishes supplements, Expert Panel Discussions, sponsored clinical Reviews, Trial Designs, and Quality and Outcomes.