Optimal timing of post-therapeutic [131I]NaI whole-body scintigraphy in predominantly low- and intermediate-risk differentiated thyroid cancer: a secondary analysis of prospectively acquired data and a structured literature review.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Andreas Pfestroff, Hannah Wolfram, Kathrin Pfestroff, Wadim Bowl, Ali Ebrahimifard, Shamim Bagheri, Pietro di Fazio, Behrooz H Yousefi, Elisabeth Maurer, Katharina Holzer, Glenn Flux, Jan Taprogge, Markus Luster, Friederike Eilsberger
{"title":"Optimal timing of post-therapeutic [<sup>131</sup>I]NaI whole-body scintigraphy in predominantly low- and intermediate-risk differentiated thyroid cancer: a secondary analysis of prospectively acquired data and a structured literature review.","authors":"Andreas Pfestroff, Hannah Wolfram, Kathrin Pfestroff, Wadim Bowl, Ali Ebrahimifard, Shamim Bagheri, Pietro di Fazio, Behrooz H Yousefi, Elisabeth Maurer, Katharina Holzer, Glenn Flux, Jan Taprogge, Markus Luster, Friederike Eilsberger","doi":"10.1186/s12880-026-02647-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-therapeutic [<sup>131</sup>I]NaI whole-body scintigraphy (ptWBS) is mandatory after radioiodine therapy (RAIT), but the most suitable acquisition time remains uncertain. We compared image interpretability at early and delayed time points in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective secondary analysis included prospectively acquired ptWBS data from 35 patients. Scans obtained at 6, 24, 48, 72, and 168 h after RAIT were independently ranked by three nuclear medicine physicians and evaluated with a 10-item criteria-based image-quality score. Rankings were analyzed using a Plackett-Luce model, and criteria-based scores were analyzed using generalized estimating equations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis comprised 167 scans, 501 criteria-based ratings, and 500 intuitive rank observations. The 24-h acquisition had the highest estimated preference, followed by 48, 6, 72, and 168 h. After Holm adjustment, 24 h was favored over 6, 72, and 168 h, whereas the difference between 24 and 48 h was not significant (P = 0.091). The criteria-based score was highest at 24 h (39.52; 95% CI, 38.62-40.43) and next-highest at 48 h (34.79); all pairwise differences in scores were significant. Each 5-point increase in the criteria-based score was associated with higher odds of a more favorable intuitive ranking (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.70-2.38).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PtWBS acquired at 24 h provided the best overall interpretability of the images. A 48 h scan may be considered when practical or radiation-protection considerations favor later imaging, but equivalence to 24 h has not been established. Additional delayed imaging may still be useful when distant metastatic disease is suspected.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13455259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02647-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Post-therapeutic [131I]NaI whole-body scintigraphy (ptWBS) is mandatory after radioiodine therapy (RAIT), but the most suitable acquisition time remains uncertain. We compared image interpretability at early and delayed time points in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC).

Methods: This retrospective secondary analysis included prospectively acquired ptWBS data from 35 patients. Scans obtained at 6, 24, 48, 72, and 168 h after RAIT were independently ranked by three nuclear medicine physicians and evaluated with a 10-item criteria-based image-quality score. Rankings were analyzed using a Plackett-Luce model, and criteria-based scores were analyzed using generalized estimating equations.

Results: The analysis comprised 167 scans, 501 criteria-based ratings, and 500 intuitive rank observations. The 24-h acquisition had the highest estimated preference, followed by 48, 6, 72, and 168 h. After Holm adjustment, 24 h was favored over 6, 72, and 168 h, whereas the difference between 24 and 48 h was not significant (P = 0.091). The criteria-based score was highest at 24 h (39.52; 95% CI, 38.62-40.43) and next-highest at 48 h (34.79); all pairwise differences in scores were significant. Each 5-point increase in the criteria-based score was associated with higher odds of a more favorable intuitive ranking (OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.70-2.38).

Conclusions: PtWBS acquired at 24 h provided the best overall interpretability of the images. A 48 h scan may be considered when practical or radiation-protection considerations favor later imaging, but equivalence to 24 h has not been established. Additional delayed imaging may still be useful when distant metastatic disease is suspected.

治疗后[131I]NaI全身显像的最佳时机用于主要低风险和中风险分化型甲状腺癌:前瞻性数据的二次分析和结构化文献综述。
背景:放射性碘治疗(RAIT)后必须进行治疗后[131I]NaI全身显像(ptWBS),但最合适的采集时间仍不确定。我们比较分化型甲状腺癌(DTC)患者早期和延迟时间点的图像可解释性。方法:回顾性二次分析包括前瞻性获得的35例患者的ptWBS数据。在RAIT后6、24、48、72和168小时获得的扫描图像由三位核医学医生独立排序,并以基于10项标准的图像质量评分进行评估。使用Plackett-Luce模型分析排名,使用广义估计方程分析基于标准的分数。结果:分析包括167个扫描,501个基于标准的评级和500个直观的排名观察。24小时的习得偏好最高,其次是48、6、72和168小时。经Holm调整后,24小时的习得偏好高于6、72和168小时,而24小时和48小时的习得偏好差异不显著(P = 0.091)。24 h评分最高(39.52;95% CI, 38.62 ~ 40.43), 48 h评分次之(34.79);得分的两两差异均显著。基于标准的评分每增加5分,更有利的直觉排名的几率就会增加(OR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.70-2.38)。结论:24 h获得的PtWBS提供了最佳的图像整体可解释性。如果出于实际或辐射防护考虑,可以考虑进行48小时的扫描,但并没有确定24小时的等效时间。当怀疑远处转移性疾病时,额外的延迟成像可能仍然有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书