[Can you] Tell me? Children's and adults' responses to open-ended prompts beginning with ‘Can you’

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Legal and Criminological Psychology Pub Date : 2026-08-10 Epub Date: 2025-12-04 DOI:10.1111/lcrp.70017
Sarah L. Deck, Hamida Zekiroski, Sonja P. Brubacher, Martine B. Powell
{"title":"[Can you] Tell me? Children's and adults' responses to open-ended prompts beginning with ‘Can you’","authors":"Sarah L. Deck,&nbsp;Hamida Zekiroski,&nbsp;Sonja P. Brubacher,&nbsp;Martine B. Powell","doi":"10.1111/lcrp.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Interviewers sometimes preface information requests with the stem ‘Can you’; for instance, ‘[Can you] tell me everything that happened?’ Questions like these often function as indirect speech acts—explicitly asking if the respondent knows the answer, while implicitly requesting that information. Although interviewers have been advised against using such phrasings with children, little research has systematically examined how children respond when these questions are used to request information. Across two studies, we explored how children and adults respond to open-ended questions starting with ‘Can you’ compared to directly phrased alternatives.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In Study 1, 39 children aged 6–12 years were interviewed about experienced events using open-ended questions that were either prefaced with ‘Can you’ or directly phrased. Study 2 extended this investigation by examining 54 adults who were interviewed about an online interactive experience as a comparison.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We explored participants' response patterns across the two open-ended question constructions, including how frequently participants responded with a simple yes/no response or provided elaboration. Children and adults responded similarly to indirect and direct open-ended question phrasings, frequently providing elaboration. There was only one case in each age group where a simple yes/no response was provided.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>While we recommend that interviewers continue to minimize use of ‘Can you’ stems on open-ended prompts, our findings show that children (aged 6 years and older) and adults predominantly do recognize the implicit request. Further research is needed to describe response patterns when questions query sensitive topics with reluctant interviewees.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18022,"journal":{"name":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","volume":"31 2","pages":"348-359"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal and Criminological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lcrp.70017","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/12/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Interviewers sometimes preface information requests with the stem ‘Can you’; for instance, ‘[Can you] tell me everything that happened?’ Questions like these often function as indirect speech acts—explicitly asking if the respondent knows the answer, while implicitly requesting that information. Although interviewers have been advised against using such phrasings with children, little research has systematically examined how children respond when these questions are used to request information. Across two studies, we explored how children and adults respond to open-ended questions starting with ‘Can you’ compared to directly phrased alternatives.

Methods

In Study 1, 39 children aged 6–12 years were interviewed about experienced events using open-ended questions that were either prefaced with ‘Can you’ or directly phrased. Study 2 extended this investigation by examining 54 adults who were interviewed about an online interactive experience as a comparison.

Results

We explored participants' response patterns across the two open-ended question constructions, including how frequently participants responded with a simple yes/no response or provided elaboration. Children and adults responded similarly to indirect and direct open-ended question phrasings, frequently providing elaboration. There was only one case in each age group where a simple yes/no response was provided.

Conclusions

While we recommend that interviewers continue to minimize use of ‘Can you’ stems on open-ended prompts, our findings show that children (aged 6 years and older) and adults predominantly do recognize the implicit request. Further research is needed to describe response patterns when questions query sensitive topics with reluctant interviewees.

你能告诉我吗?儿童和成人对以“你可以吗”开头的开放式提示的反应
面试官有时会用“Can you”作为信息询问的开头;例如,“你能告诉我发生的一切吗?”像这样的问题通常起到间接言语行为的作用——明确地询问被调查者是否知道答案,同时隐含地要求提供这些信息。尽管面试官被建议不要对孩子使用这样的措辞,但很少有研究系统地调查孩子们在用这些问题询问信息时的反应。在两项研究中,我们探讨了儿童和成人如何回应以“你能”开头的开放式问题,而不是直接措辞的替代问题。在研究1中,39名6-12岁的儿童接受了关于经历事件的访谈,使用开放式问题,这些问题要么以“你能”开头,要么直接措辞。研究2扩展了这项调查,对54名成年人进行了在线互动体验的采访,作为比较。我们探索了参与者在两个开放式问题结构中的反应模式,包括参与者用简单的是/否回答或提供详细说明的频率。儿童和成人对间接和直接的开放式问题短语的反应相似,经常提供详细说明。每个年龄组中只有一个案例给出了简单的是/否回答。虽然我们建议面试官继续尽量减少在开放式提示中使用“Can you”,但我们的研究结果表明,儿童(6岁及以上)和成年人主要能识别出隐性请求。需要进一步的研究来描述当问题涉及敏感话题时不情愿的受访者的反应模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Legal and Criminological Psychology publishes original papers in all areas of psychology and law: - victimology - policing and crime detection - crime prevention - management of offenders - mental health and the law - public attitudes to law - role of the expert witness - impact of law on behaviour - interviewing and eyewitness testimony - jury decision making - deception The journal publishes papers which advance professional and scientific knowledge defined broadly as the application of psychology to law and interdisciplinary enquiry in legal and psychological fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书