Impact of an integrated Anatomy-Transfusion Medicine program on knowledge acquisition among first-year MBBS students and Laboratory technicians: A quasi-experimental pre-post educational intervention study.

Juilee Shalik Charmode, Manish Raturi, Kirubhanand Chandrasekaran, Parag Prabhakar Fulzele, Aaditya M Tarnekar, Neema Vijay, Soumya Das, Rounak Dubey
{"title":"Impact of an integrated Anatomy-Transfusion Medicine program on knowledge acquisition among first-year MBBS students and Laboratory technicians: A quasi-experimental pre-post educational intervention study.","authors":"Juilee Shalik Charmode, Manish Raturi, Kirubhanand Chandrasekaran, Parag Prabhakar Fulzele, Aaditya M Tarnekar, Neema Vijay, Soumya Das, Rounak Dubey","doi":"10.1016/j.tracli.2026.08.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Competency-based medical education emphasizes early clinical exposure and integration of basic and clinical sciences. We evaluated the effectiveness of an integrated anatomy and transfusion medicine workshop in improving knowledge among first-year MBBS students and laboratory technicians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental pre-post educational intervention study was conducted among first-year MBBS students and laboratory technicians attending a workshop on cubital fossa anatomy, venipuncture, bone marrow anatomy and related transfusion medicine procedures. Knowledge was assessed using an identical 11-item multiple-choice questionnaire administered immediately before and after the workshop. The primary analysis included MBBS students. Laboratory technicians attending the same workshop were analyzed separately as a descriptive subgroup. Paired t-test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, 95% confidence intervals and Cohen's d<sub>z</sub> were used for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three first-year MBBS students were included in the primary analysis. Mean pre-workshop score increased from 8.09 ± 1.40 to 10.06 ± 1.09 after the workshop, with a mean paired improvement of 1.97 marks (95% CI: 1.50 to 2.44; paired t-test P<0.001; Wilcoxon P<0.001). The effect size was large (Cohen's d<sub>z</sub>=1.48). Thirty students (90.9%) improved and three (9.1%) remained unchanged; no student showed a decline. The proportion scoring at least 70% increased from 60.6% to 97.0%. Among six technicians, mean score improved from 5.17 ± 1.17 to 8.50 ± 0.84.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An integrated Anatomy-Transfusion Medicine workshop produced significant significantly improved students' immediate knowledge. Such multidisciplinary, clinically focused teaching sessions can effectively supplement routine anatomy education in competency-based medical curricula.</p>","PeriodicalId":94255,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion clinique et biologique : journal de la Societe francaise de transfusion sanguine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion clinique et biologique : journal de la Societe francaise de transfusion sanguine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tracli.2026.08.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Competency-based medical education emphasizes early clinical exposure and integration of basic and clinical sciences. We evaluated the effectiveness of an integrated anatomy and transfusion medicine workshop in improving knowledge among first-year MBBS students and laboratory technicians.

Methods: A quasi-experimental pre-post educational intervention study was conducted among first-year MBBS students and laboratory technicians attending a workshop on cubital fossa anatomy, venipuncture, bone marrow anatomy and related transfusion medicine procedures. Knowledge was assessed using an identical 11-item multiple-choice questionnaire administered immediately before and after the workshop. The primary analysis included MBBS students. Laboratory technicians attending the same workshop were analyzed separately as a descriptive subgroup. Paired t-test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, 95% confidence intervals and Cohen's dz were used for analysis.

Results: Thirty-three first-year MBBS students were included in the primary analysis. Mean pre-workshop score increased from 8.09 ± 1.40 to 10.06 ± 1.09 after the workshop, with a mean paired improvement of 1.97 marks (95% CI: 1.50 to 2.44; paired t-test P<0.001; Wilcoxon P<0.001). The effect size was large (Cohen's dz=1.48). Thirty students (90.9%) improved and three (9.1%) remained unchanged; no student showed a decline. The proportion scoring at least 70% increased from 60.6% to 97.0%. Among six technicians, mean score improved from 5.17 ± 1.17 to 8.50 ± 0.84.

Conclusion: An integrated Anatomy-Transfusion Medicine workshop produced significant significantly improved students' immediate knowledge. Such multidisciplinary, clinically focused teaching sessions can effectively supplement routine anatomy education in competency-based medical curricula.

解剖学-输血医学综合课程对一年级MBBS学生和技术人员知识获取的影响:一项准实验前-后教育干预研究。
背景:以能力为基础的医学教育强调早期临床接触和基础科学与临床科学的结合。我们评估了综合解剖学和输血医学研讨会在提高MBBS一年级学生知识方面的有效性。方法:对参加肘窝解剖、静脉穿刺、骨髓解剖及相关输血医学程序研讨会的一年级MBBS学生进行准实验教育前后干预研究。知识评估使用相同的11项多项选择问卷在研讨会之前和之后立即执行。主要分析对象包括MBBS学生。参加同一车间的实验室技术人员作为描述性亚组分别进行分析。采用配对t检验、Wilcoxon sign -rank检验、95%置信区间和Cohen’s dz进行分析。结果:33名MBBS一年级学生被纳入初步分析。工作坊前平均得分由8.09 +/- 1.40提高至10.06 +/- 1.09,工作坊后平均配对提高1.97分(95% CI: 1.50 ~ 2.44);配对t检验结论:解剖-输血医学一体化工作坊对学生的即时知识有显著提高。这种多学科的、以临床为重点的教学课程可以有效地补充常规的以能力为基础的医学课程中的解剖学教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书