Methodological determinants and prevalence of elevated intracranial pressure in isolated single-suture craniosynostosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.2
Beste Gülsuna, Parth Patel, Abdurrahman F Kharbat, Sixia Chen, Michael Machiorlatti, Andrew Jea, Nicholas Sader
{"title":"Methodological determinants and prevalence of elevated intracranial pressure in isolated single-suture craniosynostosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Beste Gülsuna, Parth Patel, Abdurrahman F Kharbat, Sixia Chen, Michael Machiorlatti, Andrew Jea, Nicholas Sader","doi":"10.1007/s00381-026-07418-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) in isolated single-suture craniosynostosis (SSC) may contribute to neurodevelopmental impairment, yet reported prevalence varies widely. This systematic review and meta-analysis estimate the pooled prevalence of elevated ICP in isolated SSC and evaluate potential modifiers including suture subtype, measurement timing, and assessment modality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched (inception to February 2026). Eligible studies reported ICP outcomes in children with isolated SSC using invasive monitoring or optical coherence tomography (OCT). Pooled prevalence was estimated using random-effects meta-analysis with Freeman-Tukey transformation, stratified by measurement modality (invasive vs. OCT). Subgroup analyses evaluated suture type and measurement timing. Heterogeneity was explored through meta-regression and sensitivity analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen studies (720 patients; 1982-2025) met inclusion criteria. All invasive studies applied a uniform ≥ 15 mmHg threshold; OCT studies used four distinct retinal nerve fiber layer algorithms approximating this threshold. Pooled prevalence was 38% (95% CI, 26-51%; I<sup>2</sup> = 77.0%) by invasive monitoring (13 studies; n = 448) and 43% (95% CI, 28-61%; I<sup>2</sup> = 83.8%) by OCT (4 studies; n = 272). The combined estimate was 39% (95% CI, 30-50%). By suture type, prevalence ranged from 33% (metopic) to 43% (sagittal) without significant differences (p = 0.89). Intraoperative studies yielded higher prevalence than preoperative (52% vs. 34%; p = 0.13). Meta-regression explained only 11.7% of between-study variance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Elevated ICP is reported in a substantial proportion of children with isolated SSC, although prevalence estimates vary considerably based on diagnostic methodology and timing of assessment. Across included studies, pooled estimates ranged between 30-50%. Noninvasive screening, such as OCT, may aid adequate detection in at-risk patients. Standardized ICP thresholds and longitudinal neurocognitive studies are needed to guide management and optimize outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":520587,"journal":{"name":"Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-026-07418-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) in isolated single-suture craniosynostosis (SSC) may contribute to neurodevelopmental impairment, yet reported prevalence varies widely. This systematic review and meta-analysis estimate the pooled prevalence of elevated ICP in isolated SSC and evaluate potential modifiers including suture subtype, measurement timing, and assessment modality.

Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched (inception to February 2026). Eligible studies reported ICP outcomes in children with isolated SSC using invasive monitoring or optical coherence tomography (OCT). Pooled prevalence was estimated using random-effects meta-analysis with Freeman-Tukey transformation, stratified by measurement modality (invasive vs. OCT). Subgroup analyses evaluated suture type and measurement timing. Heterogeneity was explored through meta-regression and sensitivity analyses.

Results: Seventeen studies (720 patients; 1982-2025) met inclusion criteria. All invasive studies applied a uniform ≥ 15 mmHg threshold; OCT studies used four distinct retinal nerve fiber layer algorithms approximating this threshold. Pooled prevalence was 38% (95% CI, 26-51%; I2 = 77.0%) by invasive monitoring (13 studies; n = 448) and 43% (95% CI, 28-61%; I2 = 83.8%) by OCT (4 studies; n = 272). The combined estimate was 39% (95% CI, 30-50%). By suture type, prevalence ranged from 33% (metopic) to 43% (sagittal) without significant differences (p = 0.89). Intraoperative studies yielded higher prevalence than preoperative (52% vs. 34%; p = 0.13). Meta-regression explained only 11.7% of between-study variance.

Conclusions: Elevated ICP is reported in a substantial proportion of children with isolated SSC, although prevalence estimates vary considerably based on diagnostic methodology and timing of assessment. Across included studies, pooled estimates ranged between 30-50%. Noninvasive screening, such as OCT, may aid adequate detection in at-risk patients. Standardized ICP thresholds and longitudinal neurocognitive studies are needed to guide management and optimize outcomes.

孤立单缝线颅缝闭合症中颅内压升高的方法学决定因素和患病率:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:孤立性单缝合线颅缝闭闭(SSC)患者颅内压升高可能导致神经发育障碍,但报道的患病率差异很大。本系统综述和荟萃分析估计了孤立SSC中ICP升高的总体发生率,并评估了包括缝合亚型、测量时间和评估方式在内的潜在调整因素。方法:检索PubMed、MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science、Scopus(建站至2026年2月)。有资格的研究报告了使用侵入性监测或光学相干断层扫描(OCT)治疗孤立性SSC儿童的ICP结果。使用随机效应荟萃分析和Freeman-Tukey转换来估计合并患病率,并按测量方式(侵入性与OCT)分层。亚组分析评估缝合方式和测量时间。通过meta回归和敏感性分析探讨异质性。结果:17项研究(720例患者;1982-2025)符合纳入标准。所有侵入性研究均采用统一的≥15 mmHg阈值;OCT研究使用了四种不同的视网膜神经纤维层算法来接近这个阈值。有创监测(13项研究,n = 448)的总患病率为38% (95% CI, 26-51%; I2 = 77.0%), OCT(4项研究,n = 272)的总患病率为43% (95% CI, 28-61%; I2 = 83.8%)。合并估计为39% (95% CI, 30-50%)。不同缝合方式的发生率从33%(异位)到43%(矢状)不等,差异无统计学意义(p = 0.89)。术中患病率高于术前(52% vs. 34%; p = 0.13)。元回归只能解释11.7%的研究间方差。结论:孤立性SSC患儿中有相当大比例的ICP升高,尽管根据诊断方法和评估时间的不同,患病率估计差异很大。在纳入的研究中,汇总估计范围在30-50%之间。无创筛查,如OCT,可能有助于对高危患者进行充分的检测。需要标准化的ICP阈值和纵向神经认知研究来指导管理和优化结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书