Surface roughness of contemporary resin composites after exposure to energy drinks.

Biomaterial investigations in dentistry Pub Date : 2026-08-04 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.2340/biid.v13.46583
Jhonatan Vilca-Mayta, José Giancarlo Tozo-Burgos, Marco Sánchez-Tito
{"title":"Surface roughness of contemporary resin composites after exposure to energy drinks.","authors":"Jhonatan Vilca-Mayta, José Giancarlo Tozo-Burgos, Marco Sánchez-Tito","doi":"10.2340/biid.v13.46583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effect of three energy drinks (Red Bull<sup>®</sup>, Volt<sup>®</sup>, and 360 Energy Drink<sup>®</sup>) on the surface roughness of three contemporary resin composites: Filtek Z350 XT, PALFIQUE LX5, and Vittra APS.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>An <i>in vitro</i> experimental design was conducted with 108 resin specimens (<i>n</i> = 12 per group). After polishing, baseline roughness (Ra, µm) was measured using a profilometer. Specimens were immersed in one of the three beverages for 1 and 7 days, with daily renewal. Roughness was recorded at T₀, T₁, and T₂. Data were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model with Sidak-adjusted post hoc comparisons (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All resins composites exhibited a progressive increase in Ra from T₀ to T₂. Filtek Z350 XT showed the greatest resistance to surface degradation, while PALFIQUE LX5 and Vittra APS were more susceptible. Red Bull<sup>®</sup> and 360 Energy Drink<sup>®</sup> induced greater roughness increases than Volt<sup>®</sup> (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Although most roughness values remained at or near the clinically accepted threshold of Ra ≤ 0.2 µm, a slight increase above this threshold was observed for PALFIQUE LX5 exposed to 360 Energy Drink<sup>®</sup> at T₂. A significant resin × time interaction (<i>p</i> = 0.034) indicated that degradation patterns depended on composite type.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Energy drinks promoted measurable increases in the surface roughness of all evaluated resin composites. Filtek Z350 XT showed greater resistance to roughness changes, whereas PALFIQUE LX5 and Vittra APS demonstrated higher susceptibility to acidic degradation.</p>","PeriodicalId":72378,"journal":{"name":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","volume":"13 ","pages":"46583"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13451951/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomaterial investigations in dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/biid.v13.46583","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of three energy drinks (Red Bull®, Volt®, and 360 Energy Drink®) on the surface roughness of three contemporary resin composites: Filtek Z350 XT, PALFIQUE LX5, and Vittra APS.

Materials and methods: An in vitro experimental design was conducted with 108 resin specimens (n = 12 per group). After polishing, baseline roughness (Ra, µm) was measured using a profilometer. Specimens were immersed in one of the three beverages for 1 and 7 days, with daily renewal. Roughness was recorded at T₀, T₁, and T₂. Data were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model with Sidak-adjusted post hoc comparisons (α = 0.05).

Results: All resins composites exhibited a progressive increase in Ra from T₀ to T₂. Filtek Z350 XT showed the greatest resistance to surface degradation, while PALFIQUE LX5 and Vittra APS were more susceptible. Red Bull® and 360 Energy Drink® induced greater roughness increases than Volt® (p < 0.05). Although most roughness values remained at or near the clinically accepted threshold of Ra ≤ 0.2 µm, a slight increase above this threshold was observed for PALFIQUE LX5 exposed to 360 Energy Drink® at T₂. A significant resin × time interaction (p = 0.034) indicated that degradation patterns depended on composite type.

Conclusion: Energy drinks promoted measurable increases in the surface roughness of all evaluated resin composites. Filtek Z350 XT showed greater resistance to roughness changes, whereas PALFIQUE LX5 and Vittra APS demonstrated higher susceptibility to acidic degradation.

当代树脂复合材料暴露于能量饮料后的表面粗糙度。
目的:本研究旨在评估三种能量饮料(红牛®、伏特®和360能量饮料®)对三种当代树脂复合材料(Filtek Z350 XT、PALFIQUE LX5和Vittra APS)表面粗糙度的影响。材料与方法:采用体外实验设计,树脂标本108个,每组12个。抛光后,使用轮廓仪测量基线粗糙度(Ra,µm)。在三种饮料中的一种中浸泡1天和7天,每天更新。粗糙度记录在T 0、T₁和T₂。采用线性混合效应模型和经sidak校正的事后比较(α = 0.05)对数据进行分析。结果:从T 0到T 2,所有树脂复合材料的Ra都呈递增趋势。Filtek Z350 XT对表面降解的抵抗力最强,而PALFIQUE LX5和Vittra APS对表面降解的抵抗力更强。红牛®和360能量饮料®比Volt®诱导的粗糙度增加更大(p < 0.05)。虽然大多数粗糙度值保持在或接近临床接受的Ra≤0.2µm的阈值,但在T 2时暴露于360能量饮料®的PALFIQUE LX5的粗糙度值略高于该阈值。显著的树脂与时间交互作用(p = 0.034)表明降解模式取决于复合材料类型。结论:能量饮料促进了所有评估树脂复合材料表面粗糙度的可测量的增加。Filtek Z350 XT对粗糙度变化的抵抗力更强,而PALFIQUE LX5和Vittra APS对酸性降解的敏感性更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书