A simple quality-of-care intervention targeting nurses for improving care of older patients in the emergency department: a Western European multicenter study.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Christophe de Terwangne, Andreas M Fischer, Anna Björg Jónsdóttir, Bastian Mizera, Michael Gagesch, Clemence Cuvelier, Adam L Gordon, Katrin Singler, Astrid D H Brys
{"title":"A simple quality-of-care intervention targeting nurses for improving care of older patients in the emergency department: a Western European multicenter study.","authors":"Christophe de Terwangne, Andreas M Fischer, Anna Björg Jónsdóttir, Bastian Mizera, Michael Gagesch, Clemence Cuvelier, Adam L Gordon, Katrin Singler, Astrid D H Brys","doi":"10.1007/s41999-026-01543-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Emergency departments (EDs) face significant challenges in delivering high-quality care for older patients. Identifying barriers and developing stakeholder-informed interventions are essential to improve ED care. This study aimed to identify nurses' perceived barriers to caring for older ED patients and to develop and evaluate a targeted intervention to improve care quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter quality improvement project (QIP) was conducted across EDs in four western European countries (2024-2025) using three iterative Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. Cycle 1 involved a needs assessment among nurses to identify barriers. Cycle 2 focused on developing and evaluating the perceived helpfulness and feasibility of three proposed interventions. Cycle 3 implemented and evaluated the selected intervention. Nurses provided feedback throughout all PDSA cycles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In Cycle 1, 82 nurses from eight EDs in Belgium (n = 22), Germany (n = 20), Switzerland (n = 30), and Iceland (n = 10) identified time constraints (n = 92; 39%), behavioral disorders (n = 30; 13%), and communication difficulties (n = 25; 11%) as key barriers. In Cycle 2, three interventions were proposed: (1) a QR-code leaflet to facilitate geriatric anamnesis through relatives, (2) educational sessions for nurses, and (3) an informative poster promoting family involvement. The QR-code and poster were evaluated as most helpful and feasible. In Cycle 3, a combined poster-QR-code intervention was developed and implemented across all sites and was well received, though with no measurable effect at this stage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Iterative PDSA cycles provided a structured framework to identify barriers, co-develop, and refine a context-specific intervention for geriatric ED care. The absence of an immediate effect underscores that continuous iteration and stakeholder engagement are essential to further enhance geriatric care within the complex ED setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":49287,"journal":{"name":"European Geriatric Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Geriatric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41999-026-01543-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Emergency departments (EDs) face significant challenges in delivering high-quality care for older patients. Identifying barriers and developing stakeholder-informed interventions are essential to improve ED care. This study aimed to identify nurses' perceived barriers to caring for older ED patients and to develop and evaluate a targeted intervention to improve care quality.

Methods: This multicenter quality improvement project (QIP) was conducted across EDs in four western European countries (2024-2025) using three iterative Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles. Cycle 1 involved a needs assessment among nurses to identify barriers. Cycle 2 focused on developing and evaluating the perceived helpfulness and feasibility of three proposed interventions. Cycle 3 implemented and evaluated the selected intervention. Nurses provided feedback throughout all PDSA cycles.

Results: In Cycle 1, 82 nurses from eight EDs in Belgium (n = 22), Germany (n = 20), Switzerland (n = 30), and Iceland (n = 10) identified time constraints (n = 92; 39%), behavioral disorders (n = 30; 13%), and communication difficulties (n = 25; 11%) as key barriers. In Cycle 2, three interventions were proposed: (1) a QR-code leaflet to facilitate geriatric anamnesis through relatives, (2) educational sessions for nurses, and (3) an informative poster promoting family involvement. The QR-code and poster were evaluated as most helpful and feasible. In Cycle 3, a combined poster-QR-code intervention was developed and implemented across all sites and was well received, though with no measurable effect at this stage.

Conclusion: Iterative PDSA cycles provided a structured framework to identify barriers, co-develop, and refine a context-specific intervention for geriatric ED care. The absence of an immediate effect underscores that continuous iteration and stakeholder engagement are essential to further enhance geriatric care within the complex ED setting.

一个简单的护理质量干预针对护士提高护理老年患者在急诊科:西欧多中心研究。
目的:急诊科(EDs)在为老年患者提供高质量护理方面面临重大挑战。识别障碍和制定利益相关者知情的干预措施对于改善急诊科护理至关重要。本研究旨在确定护士在护理老年急诊科患者时的感知障碍,并制定和评估有针对性的干预措施以提高护理质量。方法:本多中心质量改进项目(QIP)在四个西欧国家的EDs中进行(2024-2025),采用三个迭代的计划-做-研究-行动(PDSA)循环。周期1涉及护士需求评估,以确定障碍。周期2侧重于开发和评估三种拟议干预措施的感知帮助性和可行性。周期3实施和评估选定的干预措施。护士在所有PDSA周期中提供反馈。结果:在第1周期,来自比利时(n = 22)、德国(n = 20)、瑞士(n = 30)和冰岛(n = 10) 8个急诊科的82名护士认为时间限制(n = 92; 39%)、行为障碍(n = 30; 13%)和沟通困难(n = 25; 11%)是主要障碍。在周期2中,提出了三个干预措施:(1)qr码传单,以方便通过亲属进行老年记忆;(2)护士教育课程;(3)宣传海报,促进家庭参与。qr码和海报被评价为最有帮助和可行的。在周期3中,在所有站点开发并实施了联合海报qr码干预,并获得了良好的反响,尽管在此阶段没有可测量的效果。结论:迭代PDSA循环提供了一个结构化的框架来识别障碍,共同开发和完善针对老年ED护理的具体情况干预措施。没有立竿见影的效果强调了持续的迭代和利益相关者的参与对于进一步加强复杂的急诊科环境中的老年护理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Geriatric Medicine
European Geriatric Medicine GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Geriatric Medicine is the official journal of the European Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS). Launched in 2010, this journal aims to publish the highest quality material, both scientific and clinical, on all aspects of Geriatric Medicine. The EUGMS is interested in the promotion of Geriatric Medicine in any setting (acute or subacute care, rehabilitation, nursing homes, primary care, fall clinics, ambulatory assessment, dementia clinics..), and also in functionality in old age, comprehensive geriatric assessment, geriatric syndromes, geriatric education, old age psychiatry, models of geriatric care in health services, and quality assurance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书