Sociodemographic bias in LLMs' clinical decision-making for dizziness.

IF 1.2 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Idit Tessler, Mahmud Omar, Amit Wolfovitz, Yoav Gimmon, Sholem Hack, Noa Rozendorn, Nir Livneh, Eyal Klang
{"title":"Sociodemographic bias in LLMs' clinical decision-making for dizziness.","authors":"Idit Tessler, Mahmud Omar, Amit Wolfovitz, Yoav Gimmon, Sholem Hack, Noa Rozendorn, Nir Livneh, Eyal Klang","doi":"10.1177/09574271261474218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveAs large language models (LLMs) enter clinical decision support, concerns persist about sociodemographic bias. We assessed whether LLM recommendations for dizziness vary by patient descriptors and clinical detail.MethodsWe conducted a cross-randomized in-silico vignette study. One hundred synthetic emergency department dizziness cases were created using established diagnostic frameworks including the TiTrATE paradigm, SAEM GRACE-3 guidelines, and Bárány Society diagnostic criteria. Each vignette was tested in a neutral form and with 33 sociodemographic descriptor variants (34 total). Twelve instruction-tuned LLMs from multiple model families were evaluated. Models answered five binary clinical decision questions addressing etiology classification, triage disposition, neuroimaging, bedside vestibular examination, and mental health referral. Each model-vignette-descriptor combination was repeated 10 times, yielding 2,040,000 responses. Sociodemographic bias was quantified as descriptor-specific percentage-point deviations from neutral control recommendations with 95% confidence intervals.ResultsSociodemographic descriptors influenced LLM recommendations, with the largest differences observed for mental health referral decisions in diagnostically ambiguous cases. Referral likelihood was lower for Black transgender women (-12.2 pp; 95% CI -14.0 to -10.3), Black patients experiencing homelessness (-9.1 pp; -11.0 to -7.3), and patients experiencing homelessness (-7.7 pp; -9.5 to -5.9). Differences were attenuated when vignettes contained clearer diagnostic information. Other effects were smaller, including increased neuroimaging recommendations for low-income descriptors (+4.0 pp; 95% CI 2.1-5.8).ConclusionLLM clinical recommendations varied by sociodemographic descriptors, particularly under diagnostic uncertainty. More detailed clinical information reduced these disparities, suggesting structured inputs may mitigate bias in clinical AI systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":49960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation","volume":" ","pages":"9574271261474218"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09574271261474218","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveAs large language models (LLMs) enter clinical decision support, concerns persist about sociodemographic bias. We assessed whether LLM recommendations for dizziness vary by patient descriptors and clinical detail.MethodsWe conducted a cross-randomized in-silico vignette study. One hundred synthetic emergency department dizziness cases were created using established diagnostic frameworks including the TiTrATE paradigm, SAEM GRACE-3 guidelines, and Bárány Society diagnostic criteria. Each vignette was tested in a neutral form and with 33 sociodemographic descriptor variants (34 total). Twelve instruction-tuned LLMs from multiple model families were evaluated. Models answered five binary clinical decision questions addressing etiology classification, triage disposition, neuroimaging, bedside vestibular examination, and mental health referral. Each model-vignette-descriptor combination was repeated 10 times, yielding 2,040,000 responses. Sociodemographic bias was quantified as descriptor-specific percentage-point deviations from neutral control recommendations with 95% confidence intervals.ResultsSociodemographic descriptors influenced LLM recommendations, with the largest differences observed for mental health referral decisions in diagnostically ambiguous cases. Referral likelihood was lower for Black transgender women (-12.2 pp; 95% CI -14.0 to -10.3), Black patients experiencing homelessness (-9.1 pp; -11.0 to -7.3), and patients experiencing homelessness (-7.7 pp; -9.5 to -5.9). Differences were attenuated when vignettes contained clearer diagnostic information. Other effects were smaller, including increased neuroimaging recommendations for low-income descriptors (+4.0 pp; 95% CI 2.1-5.8).ConclusionLLM clinical recommendations varied by sociodemographic descriptors, particularly under diagnostic uncertainty. More detailed clinical information reduced these disparities, suggesting structured inputs may mitigate bias in clinical AI systems.

法学硕士晕眩临床决策中的社会人口学偏差。
目的:随着大型语言模型(LLMs)进入临床决策支持,对社会人口统计学偏差的担忧持续存在。我们评估了LLM对头晕的建议是否因患者描述和临床细节而异。方法采用交叉随机计算机小样本研究。使用已建立的诊断框架,包括TiTrATE范式、SAEM GRACE-3指南和Bárány学会诊断标准,创建了100例急诊头晕综合病例。每个小插图以中性形式和33个社会人口学描述符变体(总共34个)进行测试。评估了来自多个模型家庭的12个指令调整llm。模型回答了五个二元临床决策问题,包括病因分类、分诊处置、神经影像学、床边前庭检查和心理健康转诊。每个模型-图像-描述符组合重复10次,产生2,040,000个响应。社会人口统计学偏差被量化为与中性对照建议有95%置信区间的描述符特定的百分点偏差。结果社会人口学描述词影响法学硕士的建议,在诊断不明确的情况下,观察到的心理健康转诊决定差异最大。黑人变性妇女(-12.2 pp; 95% CI -14.0至-10.3)、无家可归的黑人患者(-9.1 pp; -11.0至-7.3)和无家可归的患者(-7.7 pp; -9.5至-5.9)的转诊可能性较低。当小插图包含更清晰的诊断信息时,差异减弱。其他影响较小,包括增加对低收入描述者的神经影像学推荐(+4.0 pp; 95% CI 2.1-5.8)。结论llm临床建议因社会人口学描述而异,特别是在诊断不确定的情况下。更详细的临床信息减少了这些差异,表明结构化输入可能会减轻临床人工智能系统中的偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Vestibular Research is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes experimental and observational studies, review papers, and theoretical papers based on current knowledge of the vestibular system. Subjects of the studies can include experimental animals, normal humans, and humans with vestibular or other related disorders. Study topics can include the following: Anatomy of the vestibular system, including vestibulo-ocular, vestibulo-spinal, and vestibulo-autonomic pathways Balance disorders Neurochemistry and neuropharmacology of balance, both at the systems and single neuron level Neurophysiology of balance, including the vestibular, ocular motor, autonomic, and postural control systems Psychophysics of spatial orientation Space and motion sickness Vestibular rehabilitation Vestibular-related human performance in various environments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书