Improving diagnostic clarity in fibro-osseous lesions using modified Gallego's, alizarin red, and von kossa stains: A pilot comparative study.

Q3 Medicine
Sharon Sam, Vijaya Nirmala Subramani, Anand Ramanathan, Thamizhchelvan Harikrishnan
{"title":"Improving diagnostic clarity in fibro-osseous lesions using modified Gallego's, alizarin red, and von kossa stains: A pilot comparative study.","authors":"Sharon Sam, Vijaya Nirmala Subramani, Anand Ramanathan, Thamizhchelvan Harikrishnan","doi":"10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_11_26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distinguishing bone, cementum, and immature osteoid in maxillofacial fibro-osseous lesions (FOLs) can be challenging using routine haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining alone.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantitatively evaluate the comparative diagnostic utility of H&E, Alizarin Red, Von Kossa, and Modified Gallego's stains (MGS) in identifying mineralized components across FOL subtypes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this pilot study, archival specimens of fibrous dysplasia (<i>n</i> = 2), cemento-osseous dysplasia (<i>n</i> = 2), cemento-ossifying fibroma (<i>n</i> = 2), and juvenile ossifying fibromas (<i>n</i> = 2) were stained. Independent pathologists scored structural feature visibility utilizing a semi-quantitative 0-3 scale. Visibility scores, inter-observer, and intra-observer reliability were analysed using Friedman, Wilcoxon signed-rank, and Gwet's AC1 tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Qualitatively, MGS provided consistent bone (green) versus cementum (red) differentiation, Alizarin Red isolated immature osteoid, and Von Kossa mapped mature, phosphate-rich calcifications. Quantitatively, inter-observer reliability demonstrated strong to perfect consensus, while intra-observer stability was moderate-to-perfect for MGS, slight-to-substantial for Alizarin Red, and poor-to-moderate for Von Kossa. Descriptively, MGS achieved the highest mean clarity score (2.93 ± 0.25), followed closely by Alizarin Red (2.80 ± 0.40) and Von Kossa (1.80 ± 1.17). Global Friedman and post-hoc pairwise comparisons confirmed that these differences were statistically significant (<i>P</i> = 0.0003), with both MGS (<i>P</i> = 0.0069) and Alizarin Red (<i>P</i> = 0.0057) yielding significantly superior diagnostic clarity over Von Kossa (<i>P</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Integrating a targeted special stain selection protocol significantly overcomes the descriptive limitations of routine H&E, reducing diagnostic ambiguity in maxillofacial FOL configurations.</p>","PeriodicalId":38846,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology","volume":"30 2","pages":"303-311"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13450932/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_11_26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Distinguishing bone, cementum, and immature osteoid in maxillofacial fibro-osseous lesions (FOLs) can be challenging using routine haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining alone.

Objective: To quantitatively evaluate the comparative diagnostic utility of H&E, Alizarin Red, Von Kossa, and Modified Gallego's stains (MGS) in identifying mineralized components across FOL subtypes.

Materials and methods: In this pilot study, archival specimens of fibrous dysplasia (n = 2), cemento-osseous dysplasia (n = 2), cemento-ossifying fibroma (n = 2), and juvenile ossifying fibromas (n = 2) were stained. Independent pathologists scored structural feature visibility utilizing a semi-quantitative 0-3 scale. Visibility scores, inter-observer, and intra-observer reliability were analysed using Friedman, Wilcoxon signed-rank, and Gwet's AC1 tests.

Results: Qualitatively, MGS provided consistent bone (green) versus cementum (red) differentiation, Alizarin Red isolated immature osteoid, and Von Kossa mapped mature, phosphate-rich calcifications. Quantitatively, inter-observer reliability demonstrated strong to perfect consensus, while intra-observer stability was moderate-to-perfect for MGS, slight-to-substantial for Alizarin Red, and poor-to-moderate for Von Kossa. Descriptively, MGS achieved the highest mean clarity score (2.93 ± 0.25), followed closely by Alizarin Red (2.80 ± 0.40) and Von Kossa (1.80 ± 1.17). Global Friedman and post-hoc pairwise comparisons confirmed that these differences were statistically significant (P = 0.0003), with both MGS (P = 0.0069) and Alizarin Red (P = 0.0057) yielding significantly superior diagnostic clarity over Von Kossa (P < 0.01).

Conclusion: Integrating a targeted special stain selection protocol significantly overcomes the descriptive limitations of routine H&E, reducing diagnostic ambiguity in maxillofacial FOL configurations.

改良Gallego,茜素红和von kossa染色提高纤维骨病变的诊断清晰度:一项试点比较研究。
背景:单独使用常规的血红素和伊红(H&E)染色在颌面部纤维-骨性病变(FOLs)中区分骨、骨质和未成熟的类骨是具有挑战性的。目的:定量评价H&E、茜素红、Von Kossa和改良Gallego染色(MGS)在鉴别FOL亚型中矿化成分的比较诊断价值。材料和方法:在本初步研究中,对纤维性发育不良(n = 2)、骨质-骨性发育不良(n = 2)、骨质-骨化纤维瘤(n = 2)和幼年骨化纤维瘤(n = 2)的档案标本进行染色。独立病理学家使用半定量0-3量表对结构特征可见性进行评分。使用Friedman、Wilcoxon符号秩和Gwet的AC1检验分析可见性评分、观察者间和观察者内的信度。结果:定性地,MGS提供了一致的骨(绿色)和骨质(红色)分化,Alizarin red分离了未成熟的类骨,Von Kossa绘制了成熟的,富含磷酸盐的钙化。在数量上,观察者之间的可靠性表现出强烈到完美的一致性,而观察者内部的稳定性对于MGS来说是中等到完美的,对于茜素红来说是轻微到可观的,对于冯·科萨来说是差到中等的。描述性地,MGS的平均清晰度评分最高(2.93±0.25),其次是茜素红(2.80±0.40)和Von Kossa(1.80±1.17)。Global Friedman和事后两两比较证实了这些差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.0003), MGS (P = 0.0069)和Alizarin Red (P = 0.0057)的诊断清晰性明显优于Von Kossa (P < 0.01)。结论:整合有针对性的特殊染色选择方案显著克服了常规H&E的描述性局限性,减少了颌面部FOL配置的诊断歧义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology
Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
115
期刊介绍: The journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology [ISSN:print-(0973-029X, online-1998-393X)] is a tri-annual journal published on behalf of “The Indian Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathologists” (IAOMP). The publication of JOMFP was started in the year 1993. The journal publishes papers on a wide spectrum of topics associated with the scope of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, also, ensuring scientific merit and quality. It is a comprehensive reading material for the professionals who want to upgrade their diagnostic skills in Oral Diseases; allows exposure to newer topics and methods of research in the Oral-facial Tissues and Pathology. New features allow an open minded thinking and approach to various pathologies. It also encourages authors to showcase quality work done by them and to compile relevant cases which are diagnostically challenging. The Journal takes pride in maintaining the quality of articles and photomicrographs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书