Taylor Jamali, Kailie McGee, Taylor Daniels, Melanie Lagomichos
{"title":"Successful cesarean section utilizing a right paramedian incision in a woman who had a mitrofanoff procedure: A case report.","authors":"Taylor Jamali, Kailie McGee, Taylor Daniels, Melanie Lagomichos","doi":"10.1177/2050313X251390618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cesarean section (CS) is among the most common surgical operations worldwide. While transverse Pfannenstiel incisions are now considered standard of care, vertical incisions-including midline and paramedian-were historically more common. In certain patients, anatomical variations or prior surgical procedures can render Pfannenstiel incisions unsafe. Paramedian incisions, though less frequently used in obstetrics, may offer advantages such as improved lateral exposure, reduced adhesion risks, and decreased risk of future herniation. We describe the delivery of a patient with a history of a Mitrofanoff procedure, in whom dense adhesions and anatomical alterations posed challenges to standard CS approaches. A paramedian incision was selected due to its ability to provide safer exposure while avoiding the region of prior reconstructive surgery. This approach minimized the risk of inadvertent injury, optimized visualization, and facilitated successful delivery. This case highlights that adhesions and anatomical modifications from prior procedures can complicate routine obstetric surgical planning. In such patients, a paramedian incision may be superior to the Pfannenstiel approach by enhancing surgical exposure and reducing the likelihood of complications. A multidisciplinary team and adaptable delivery plan are critical to achieving favorable maternal and neonatal outcomes in complex surgical scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":21418,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Medical Case Reports","volume":"14 ","pages":"2050313X251390618"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13451735/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Medical Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2050313X251390618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cesarean section (CS) is among the most common surgical operations worldwide. While transverse Pfannenstiel incisions are now considered standard of care, vertical incisions-including midline and paramedian-were historically more common. In certain patients, anatomical variations or prior surgical procedures can render Pfannenstiel incisions unsafe. Paramedian incisions, though less frequently used in obstetrics, may offer advantages such as improved lateral exposure, reduced adhesion risks, and decreased risk of future herniation. We describe the delivery of a patient with a history of a Mitrofanoff procedure, in whom dense adhesions and anatomical alterations posed challenges to standard CS approaches. A paramedian incision was selected due to its ability to provide safer exposure while avoiding the region of prior reconstructive surgery. This approach minimized the risk of inadvertent injury, optimized visualization, and facilitated successful delivery. This case highlights that adhesions and anatomical modifications from prior procedures can complicate routine obstetric surgical planning. In such patients, a paramedian incision may be superior to the Pfannenstiel approach by enhancing surgical exposure and reducing the likelihood of complications. A multidisciplinary team and adaptable delivery plan are critical to achieving favorable maternal and neonatal outcomes in complex surgical scenarios.
期刊介绍:
SAGE Open Medical Case Reports (indexed in PubMed Central) is a peer reviewed, open access journal. It aims to provide a publication home for short case reports and case series, which often do not find a place in traditional primary research journals, but provide key insights into real medical cases that are essential for physicians, and may ultimately help to improve patient outcomes. SAGE Open Medical Case Reports does not limit content due to page budgets or thematic significance. Papers are subject to rigorous peer review and are selected on the basis of whether the research is sound and deserves publication. By virtue of not restricting papers to a narrow discipline, SAGE Open Medical Case Reports facilitates the discovery of the connections between papers, whether within or between disciplines. Case reports can span the full spectrum of medicine across the health sciences in the broadest sense, including: Allergy/Immunology Anaesthesia/Pain Cardiovascular Critical Care/ Emergency Medicine Dentistry Dermatology Diabetes/Endocrinology Epidemiology/Public Health Gastroenterology/Hepatology Geriatrics/Gerontology Haematology Infectious Diseases Mental Health/Psychiatry Nephrology Neurology Nursing Obstetrics/Gynaecology Oncology Ophthalmology Orthopaedics/Rehabilitation/Occupational Therapy Otolaryngology Palliative Medicine Pathology Pharmacoeconomics/health economics Pharmacoepidemiology/Drug safety Psychopharmacology Radiology Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology/ Clinical Immunology Sports Medicine Surgery Toxicology Urology Women''s Health.