Successful cesarean section utilizing a right paramedian incision in a woman who had a mitrofanoff procedure: A case report.

IF 0.6 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
SAGE Open Medical Case Reports Pub Date : 2026-08-07 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1177/2050313X251390618
Taylor Jamali, Kailie McGee, Taylor Daniels, Melanie Lagomichos
{"title":"Successful cesarean section utilizing a right paramedian incision in a woman who had a mitrofanoff procedure: A case report.","authors":"Taylor Jamali, Kailie McGee, Taylor Daniels, Melanie Lagomichos","doi":"10.1177/2050313X251390618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cesarean section (CS) is among the most common surgical operations worldwide. While transverse Pfannenstiel incisions are now considered standard of care, vertical incisions-including midline and paramedian-were historically more common. In certain patients, anatomical variations or prior surgical procedures can render Pfannenstiel incisions unsafe. Paramedian incisions, though less frequently used in obstetrics, may offer advantages such as improved lateral exposure, reduced adhesion risks, and decreased risk of future herniation. We describe the delivery of a patient with a history of a Mitrofanoff procedure, in whom dense adhesions and anatomical alterations posed challenges to standard CS approaches. A paramedian incision was selected due to its ability to provide safer exposure while avoiding the region of prior reconstructive surgery. This approach minimized the risk of inadvertent injury, optimized visualization, and facilitated successful delivery. This case highlights that adhesions and anatomical modifications from prior procedures can complicate routine obstetric surgical planning. In such patients, a paramedian incision may be superior to the Pfannenstiel approach by enhancing surgical exposure and reducing the likelihood of complications. A multidisciplinary team and adaptable delivery plan are critical to achieving favorable maternal and neonatal outcomes in complex surgical scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":21418,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Medical Case Reports","volume":"14 ","pages":"2050313X251390618"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13451735/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Medical Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2050313X251390618","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cesarean section (CS) is among the most common surgical operations worldwide. While transverse Pfannenstiel incisions are now considered standard of care, vertical incisions-including midline and paramedian-were historically more common. In certain patients, anatomical variations or prior surgical procedures can render Pfannenstiel incisions unsafe. Paramedian incisions, though less frequently used in obstetrics, may offer advantages such as improved lateral exposure, reduced adhesion risks, and decreased risk of future herniation. We describe the delivery of a patient with a history of a Mitrofanoff procedure, in whom dense adhesions and anatomical alterations posed challenges to standard CS approaches. A paramedian incision was selected due to its ability to provide safer exposure while avoiding the region of prior reconstructive surgery. This approach minimized the risk of inadvertent injury, optimized visualization, and facilitated successful delivery. This case highlights that adhesions and anatomical modifications from prior procedures can complicate routine obstetric surgical planning. In such patients, a paramedian incision may be superior to the Pfannenstiel approach by enhancing surgical exposure and reducing the likelihood of complications. A multidisciplinary team and adaptable delivery plan are critical to achieving favorable maternal and neonatal outcomes in complex surgical scenarios.

成功剖宫产利用右辅助切口的妇女谁有米特凡诺夫程序:一个病例报告。
剖宫产是世界上最常见的外科手术之一。虽然横向Pfannenstiel切口现在被认为是标准的护理,但垂直切口(包括中线和辅助切口)在历史上更为常见。在某些患者中,解剖变异或先前的外科手术可使Pfannenstiel切口不安全。辅助切口,虽然不常用于产科,但可以提供诸如改善外侧暴露,减少粘连风险和降低未来疝的风险等优点。我们描述了一位有米特罗法诺夫手术史的患者,其中密集粘连和解剖改变对标准CS入路构成了挑战。选择辅助切口是因为它能够提供更安全的暴露,同时避免先前重建手术的区域。这种方法最大限度地降低了意外伤害的风险,优化了可视化效果,并促进了顺利分娩。本病例强调先前手术的粘连和解剖改变会使常规产科手术计划复杂化。在这类患者中,通过增加手术暴露和减少并发症的可能性,旁位切口可能优于Pfannenstiel入路。一个多学科的团队和适应性强的分娩计划是在复杂的手术方案中实现良好的孕产妇和新生儿结局的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SAGE Open Medical Case Reports
SAGE Open Medical Case Reports MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
320
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: SAGE Open Medical Case Reports (indexed in PubMed Central) is a peer reviewed, open access journal. It aims to provide a publication home for short case reports and case series, which often do not find a place in traditional primary research journals, but provide key insights into real medical cases that are essential for physicians, and may ultimately help to improve patient outcomes. SAGE Open Medical Case Reports does not limit content due to page budgets or thematic significance. Papers are subject to rigorous peer review and are selected on the basis of whether the research is sound and deserves publication. By virtue of not restricting papers to a narrow discipline, SAGE Open Medical Case Reports facilitates the discovery of the connections between papers, whether within or between disciplines. Case reports can span the full spectrum of medicine across the health sciences in the broadest sense, including: Allergy/Immunology Anaesthesia/Pain Cardiovascular Critical Care/ Emergency Medicine Dentistry Dermatology Diabetes/Endocrinology Epidemiology/Public Health Gastroenterology/Hepatology Geriatrics/Gerontology Haematology Infectious Diseases Mental Health/Psychiatry Nephrology Neurology Nursing Obstetrics/Gynaecology Oncology Ophthalmology Orthopaedics/Rehabilitation/Occupational Therapy Otolaryngology Palliative Medicine Pathology Pharmacoeconomics/health economics Pharmacoepidemiology/Drug safety Psychopharmacology Radiology Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology/ Clinical Immunology Sports Medicine Surgery Toxicology Urology Women''s Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书