Shashank Chapala, Ramya Munnur, Jonathan Gibson, Karthikeyan P Iyengar, Jwalant Mehta, Rajesh Botchu
{"title":"From mechanization to cognitive autonomy: the journey of healthcare evolution from Industry 1.0 to 6.0.","authors":"Shashank Chapala, Ramya Munnur, Jonathan Gibson, Karthikeyan P Iyengar, Jwalant Mehta, Rajesh Botchu","doi":"10.1093/postmj/qgag108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The symbiotic relationship between industrial advancement and healthcare delivery has fundamentally shaped modern medicine. This comprehensive review article explores the historical and technological trajectory from the First Industrial Revolution (Industry 1.0) to the rapidly emerging Sixth Industrial Revolution (Industry 6.0), meticulously mapping distinct industrial milestones to their concurrent evolutions in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An exhaustive electronic search was conducted across multiple premier academic and clinical databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library using specific technological enablers, clinical application domains and reported barriers to implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While Industry 1.0 through 3.0 focused on mechanization, mass production, and rudimentary automation, resulting in the institutionalization and digitization of medicine, the advent of Industry 4.0 introduced cyber-physical systems and the Medical Internet of Things/Internet of Medical Things. Subsequently, Industry 5.0 emerged to address the depersonalization of hyper-automation by reintegrating human-centricity, ethical governance, and mass personalization.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This review posits that the global ecosystem is now transitioning into Industry 6.0, an era characterized by antifragile manufacturing, quantum computing, deep digital twins, and autonomous cognitive systems. By examining specific applications across diagnosis, treatment, screening, monitoring, prevention, and rehabilitation--with a particular focus on hightechnology fields such as orthopaedics--this paper illustrates a paradigm shift from reactive, standardized interventions to proactive, hyper-personalized, and autonomous healthcare delivery models.</p>","PeriodicalId":20374,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/postmj/qgag108","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The symbiotic relationship between industrial advancement and healthcare delivery has fundamentally shaped modern medicine. This comprehensive review article explores the historical and technological trajectory from the First Industrial Revolution (Industry 1.0) to the rapidly emerging Sixth Industrial Revolution (Industry 6.0), meticulously mapping distinct industrial milestones to their concurrent evolutions in clinical practice.
Methods: An exhaustive electronic search was conducted across multiple premier academic and clinical databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library using specific technological enablers, clinical application domains and reported barriers to implementation.
Results: While Industry 1.0 through 3.0 focused on mechanization, mass production, and rudimentary automation, resulting in the institutionalization and digitization of medicine, the advent of Industry 4.0 introduced cyber-physical systems and the Medical Internet of Things/Internet of Medical Things. Subsequently, Industry 5.0 emerged to address the depersonalization of hyper-automation by reintegrating human-centricity, ethical governance, and mass personalization.
Conclusion: This review posits that the global ecosystem is now transitioning into Industry 6.0, an era characterized by antifragile manufacturing, quantum computing, deep digital twins, and autonomous cognitive systems. By examining specific applications across diagnosis, treatment, screening, monitoring, prevention, and rehabilitation--with a particular focus on hightechnology fields such as orthopaedics--this paper illustrates a paradigm shift from reactive, standardized interventions to proactive, hyper-personalized, and autonomous healthcare delivery models.
背景:工业进步和医疗服务之间的共生关系从根本上塑造了现代医学。这篇全面的综述文章探讨了从第一次工业革命(工业1.0)到迅速兴起的第六次工业革命(工业6.0)的历史和技术轨迹,精心绘制了不同的工业里程碑及其在临床实践中的同步演变。方法:对多个主要的学术和临床数据库进行详尽的电子搜索,包括PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane图书馆,使用特定的技术使能器、临床应用领域和报告的实施障碍。结果:工业1.0到3.0侧重于机械化、批量生产和初步自动化,导致医疗制度化和数字化,工业4.0的出现引入了网络物理系统和医疗物联网。随后,工业5.0的出现,通过重新整合以人为中心、道德治理和大规模个性化,解决了超自动化的去个性化问题。结论:本文认为全球生态系统正在向工业6.0过渡,这是一个以反脆弱制造、量子计算、深度数字孪生和自主认知系统为特征的时代。通过研究诊断、治疗、筛查、监测、预防和康复等领域的具体应用(特别关注矫形外科等高科技领域),本文阐述了从被动、标准化干预到主动、超个性化和自主医疗保健交付模式的范式转变。
期刊介绍:
Postgraduate Medical Journal is a peer reviewed journal published on behalf of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. The journal aims to support junior doctors and their teachers and contribute to the continuing professional development of all doctors by publishing papers on a wide range of topics relevant to the practicing clinician and teacher. Papers published in PMJ include those that focus on core competencies; that describe current practice and new developments in all branches of medicine; that describe relevance and impact of translational research on clinical practice; that provide background relevant to examinations; and papers on medical education and medical education research. PMJ supports CPD by providing the opportunity for doctors to publish many types of articles including original clinical research; reviews; quality improvement reports; editorials, and correspondence on clinical matters.